You can bet there is a lot of this going on with certain judges...
To: Tench_Coxe
Ohhh, a scathing rebuke?! That will teach them.
2 posted on
04/22/2025 7:56:02 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
To: nobody in particular
ever member of the aclu has boasberg on speed dial.
3 posted on
04/22/2025 7:56:41 AM PDT by
SGCOS
(If COVID doesn't kill you, the vaccines will. )
To: Tench_Coxe
Wow! There is a judge in this country who supports the American people and their Constitution.
4 posted on
04/22/2025 7:58:01 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(It's time to deport the Supreme Court under the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.)
To: Tench_Coxe
a serious breach of judicial ethics?
What is that?
Never heard of it before.
Must be a right-wing myth or conspiracy theory or sumtin.........
5 posted on
04/22/2025 8:00:10 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Tench_Coxe
U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Texas
To: Tench_Coxe
8 posted on
04/22/2025 8:03:52 AM PDT by
nopardons
To: Tench_Coxe
An ex parte communication is a written or oral communication that involves only one side of a pending or imminent case without giving reasonable prior notice to all parties involved.
This type of communication is generally prohibited in legal proceedings to ensure fairness and that all parties have the same information as the judge deciding the case.
Exceptions are made for administrative purposes, such as scheduling or emergencies, provided no party gains an advantage.
If an ex parte communication occurs, the judge must disclose it to all parties and give them an opportunity to respond.
Examples of prohibited ex parte communications include:
A party sending a letter directly to the judge without providing a copy to the other parties.
A judge receiving a communication that discusses the merits of a case from a party or their representative without notifying the other parties.
Exceptions to the prohibition on ex parte communications include:
Written advice from a disinterested expert on the law, provided the judge gives advance notice to the parties. Communications expressly authorized by law, such as those related to traffic citations.
If a judge receives an unauthorized ex parte communication, they must promptly notify all parties of its substance and allow them to respond.
To: Tench_Coxe
once upon a time, wasnt that illegal?
10 posted on
04/22/2025 8:06:44 AM PDT by
sit-rep
(START DEMANDING INDICTMENTS NOW!!!!!)
To: Tench_Coxe
I’d bet on Jimmy BiasedJerk doing this kind of thing all the time.
13 posted on
04/22/2025 8:12:53 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: Tench_Coxe
Wake me when the Judge orders “ Bailiff, Whack His PeePee!”……
15 posted on
04/22/2025 8:25:07 AM PDT by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
To: Tench_Coxe
A judge named Jimmy Hendrix?
To: Tench_Coxe
Far left ACLU. Now there is a redundancy for you
20 posted on
04/22/2025 8:50:47 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there)
To: Tench_Coxe
No penalty means lets do it again.
26 posted on
04/22/2025 9:55:10 AM PDT by
Revel
To: Tench_Coxe
ACLU does something that sounds unethical? Not good. But isn’t this sort of like complaining that skunks smell bad?
28 posted on
04/22/2025 10:33:10 AM PDT by
Cincinnatus.45-70
(What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
To: Tench_Coxe
You can bet there is a lot of this going on with certain judges... Like Boasberg at 1:00am on a Saturday?
-PJ
29 posted on
04/22/2025 10:40:57 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson