Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/22/2025 7:53:06 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe
In a scathing rebuke, U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, a Trump appointee, issued a blistering court order chastising the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for attempting to engage in an ex parte communication — a serious breach of judicial ethics — in a high-profile case involving illegal aliens detained at the Bluebonnet Detention Center.
Ex parte communications are interactions where one party or their representative communicates directly with a judge or decision-maker about a pending case without notifying the other parties.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Ohhh, a scathing rebuke?! That will teach them.
ever member of the aclu has boasberg on speed dial.
Wow! There is a judge in this country who supports the American people and their Constitution.
a serious breach of judicial ethics?
What is that?
Never heard of it before.
Must be a right-wing myth or conspiracy theory or sumtin.........
How about a bar complaint and maybe even disbarment. Nah I guess not. What was I thinking?
BTTT
This type of communication is generally prohibited in legal proceedings to ensure fairness and that all parties have the same information as the judge deciding the case.
Exceptions are made for administrative purposes, such as scheduling or emergencies, provided no party gains an advantage.
If an ex parte communication occurs, the judge must disclose it to all parties and give them an opportunity to respond.
Examples of prohibited ex parte communications include:
A party sending a letter directly to the judge without providing a copy to the other parties.
A judge receiving a communication that discusses the merits of a case from a party or their representative without notifying the other parties.
Exceptions to the prohibition on ex parte communications include:
Written advice from a disinterested expert on the law, provided the judge gives advance notice to the parties. Communications expressly authorized by law, such as those related to traffic citations.
If a judge receives an unauthorized ex parte communication, they must promptly notify all parties of its substance and allow them to respond.
once upon a time, wasnt that illegal?
Sorry, the source for Post #9 is from AI.
🤣👍
I’d bet on Jimmy BiasedJerk doing this kind of thing all the time.
Or even some sanctions.
Wake me when the Judge orders “ Bailiff, Whack His PeePee!”……
Big Bambu to you too.
Boasberg and traitor Roberts likely have an open back channel to plot stratergy.
The word you are looking for is "malinformation". Malinformation is like misinformation, except unlike misinformation, malinformation is true but bad for the revolution.
The EU is going to criminalize malinformation this very year.
A judge named Jimmy Hendrix?
Far left ACLU. Now there is a redundancy for you
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.