This is what happens when they close the insane asylums.
This is the uprising, David.
Nah, we need to stop the rat party once and for all.
Brooks is worthless and weak. Once Trump defunds PBS he will disappear.
Brooks wants to make sure on the Satanic, DemonRATS have all the power.
Dear Dave,
Trump is just using his Constitutional Powers.
Much like your best bud BrOncO.
BTTT
“Acquisition of Power” ——> “Our Democracy.”
Two nutjobs.
They need to give it a rest.
This ‘GOP’ bunch is kept in line because they need an income stream and the DNC-controlled media sets the rules. That why people like Brooks are the ONLY Republicans given any airtime.
This is so unlike them. They’ve never been interested in power before.
Gutfeld and Co. had a great take on David Brooks last week. A lovely time was had by all.
We can’t successfully impeach judges, but a Republican Congress and President can removal their tools of obstruction.
Perhaps:
Federal judges shall not make law, but merely help litigants get the benefit of the text and intended meaning of the provisions of the Constitution when placed into it, statutory law and the remnants of common law.
No ruling or decision by a federal judge on a case against a goverment, a governmental agency or governmental person shall be valid beyond the litigants personally named within without being ratified by a law passed by Congress.
No foreign-born federal judge shall work on an immigration, asylum or removal case.
No district court federal judge shall work on a case who has a parent, aunt, uncle, sibling, child, grandchild or known partner of such close relative or a personal partner with a case related interest.
The following district and appellate court judges are hereby by federal statute barred from hearing cases where the federal government or a historically/currently federally funded person or entity is a party:
....
If judges don’t what to be shaking their fists instead of gavels, they need to behave and know their place.
If judges don’t want to have to wear fools’ caps as Congress may require, they need to behave and know their place.
We can’t successfully impeach judges, but a Republican Congress and President can removal their tools of obstruction.
Perhaps:
Federal judges shall not make law, but merely help litigants get the benefit of the text and intended meaning of the provisions of the Constitution when placed into it, statutory law and the remnants of common law.
No ruling or decision by a federal judge on a case against a goverment, a governmental agency or governmental person shall be valid beyond the litigants personally named within without being ratified by a law passed by Congress.
No foreign-born federal judge shall work on an immigration, asylum or removal case.
No district court federal judge shall work on a case who has a parent, aunt, uncle, sibling, child, grandchild or known partner of such close relative or a personal partner with a case related interest.
The following district and appellate court judges are hereby by federal statute barred from hearing cases where the federal government or a historically/currently federally funded person or entity is a party:
....
If judges don’t what to be shaking their fists instead of gavels, they need to behave and know their place.
If judges don’t want to have to wear fools’ caps as Congress may require, they need to behave and know their place.
Anything that “Livens humanity”. Is that what you call it?
I don’t think that Brooks suffers from TDS the way Jennifer Rubin does. I think he is a craven cynical RINO to the core elitist type, who will give up everything important to get a little that is unimportant, and is VERY comfortable in his position, and wants to maintain it.
But my point is, this is all one thing. And if institutions and even sectors try to respond to this individually, they’re doomed.
managing for what you don’t want never takes you anywhere. It is a French revolution, there is always another thing you don’t want.
Trump is an american revolution for clear objectives. MAGA
Brooks (and his employer, and the CIA by inference) are calling for a Color Revolution.
Amassing power by slashing the size and power of government....
Dumbarse.
So a columnist can encourage an uprising against an administration and not be held accountable by the editor. Gotcha!!
David Brooks, New York Times: “What’s Happening Is Not Normal. America Needs an Uprising That Is Not Normal.”
That’s how you get real tyrants.
It’s like the danger of abusing antibiotics. Some powerful antibiotics are very dangerous to use, not because they effectively kill bacteria but because they promote the rapid evolution of much more potent, deadly strains. But in this case, they are choosing potent antibiotics to target healthy gut bacteria.
If the left, and quisling “conservatives” like Brooks, achieve their aim, they will leave a vacuum that can only be filled by a true tyrant. They attack President Trump, who is, ironically, the one protecting most of them from total destruction.
Look what leftism did to Venezuela. It reduced the population to abject poverty so they had to wait in line for hours to get basic staples. Zoo animals were killed for food. That’s where these folks’ “Uprising” will get them. Or, more likely, just dead.