Posted on 03/22/2025 8:23:53 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
In the last two months, Li has been all over the internet. An interview with Patrick Bet-David netted 2.5 million. As Bet-David noted, “A lot of people want to know, is she straight up, is she real?”
Now, here’s what troubles me. In her interviews, Li freely shares the story of her political evolution
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
“She is like a fair weather friend. Not trusted.”
I don’t know much about her, but what I have read sure screams “Be careful — she’s a raw, money-grubbing opportunist.”
In fundraising, she’s not just collecting checks; she’s in the room where the big Republican talks happen, hearing the unfiltered plans, the off-the-record gripes, the whole playbook. Pocketing that intel and selling it back to Democratic contacts would be child’s play.
Republicans letting her close could be handing her a goldmine to sell out later. Her track record backs it up—she’s already jumped ship once. Republicans would be fools to think she wouldn’t play both sides if the price was right.
I just don't trust that kind of conversion.
Bottom line, she’s Chinese, a massive progressive, and we don’t need her at all. There’s no need to trust her anyway.
It doesn't really mater if we do or don't. She is an independent fund razor. If she can bring in the cash is the only question.
Remember the folks at Fox described her as a ‘fund raiser’? That could only mean she’s off the hook on the political end-it’s not her ‘department’. It also suggests these people are only guilty of being successful in business meaning no core values.
Think: Dick Morris was a ‘republican’ who got Clinton reelected. He then went at it with Hillary. After that came the toe-sucking-sold more books.
Tulsi?
She should NEVER be allowed to be around ANY of our donors!!! She jumped WAY TOO QUICKLY!!!!
Shawn Ryan is swamp, and most of his guests are too. Lot of gaslighting in that show.
She’s about as conservative as RFK’s veep running mate.
I’m with you. At first, it seemed great - a former top DNC official spilling the beans, but over the weeks I started asking questions like:
1) Why didn’t she resign before the election if it was so bad?
2) Does she really think that the Republican base would ever trust her, given her past?
3) What would she have done if Harris won?
4) Look at her age - how did she climb so quickly to the #2 position in the Democrats? She had to have ‘sponsors’.
5) Why does she appear to be the only person from that org red-pilled?
The idea of Double-Agent is intriguing and could easily explain it if you think of the situation of the VERY SMART people* at the top of the DNC who know that ‘woke’ is killing them, but speaking out against ‘woke’ would split the party down the middle and leave a HUGE HOLE that the Republicans would gladly fill.
To put it another way - when she talks, she is saying what Obama/Bill Clinton/Van Jones speaking.
*and don’t fool yourselves - the Democrats SHOULD be getting 30% of the vote, if that, with their policies...yet they get 50% of the votes. That takes BRAINS, and some of those brains are used to organize voters, to fund raise, to cheat, and to respond effectively to the REASONABLE positions of the Republicans - making them sound ‘extreme’.
He's been a pinch-faced homo from go, God beat him with an ugly stick, but one who might have been working for Trump all along because Brock helped sink Cankles '16. And what money? A textbook profligate spendthrift.
Musk sued the everlasting shit out of MMfA and MMfA promptly threw most everyone overboard a year ago.
Yep. Her ears will always be open and she’ll be taking mental notes. She should prove her Road to Damascus conversion for a decade or more before being trusted.
Seems likely.
She’s Chinese born, lived in England, went to Princeton, worked for an Admiral running for office, winds up on CIA Shawn Ryan show….
Yeah, trusting her world be idiotic.
In my view the Mena disclosures were when things started going sideways.
The Clinton/Bush/CIA connection was rock solid—and if investigated in depth could have crushed critical Deep State operations.
At that point American Spectator lost its nerve and went into hiding.
She came forward AFTER her party lost.
She had ample time to do the right thing before her party was left in nuclear wast ruins but picked among the burning wreckage, walked over waving a white flag - nah, I don’t trust her.
I say welcome her, but in full recognition of the duplicitous world we live in be vigilant and appropriately guarded. As to her age when she worked for Sestak, she was listed as being in high school at the time. Also, she was at Princeton when she was just 17, so her age probably doesn't accurately represent what we would expect most American kids to be doing at similar ages.
I would not, however, put her in positions in which sensitive information is being shared. At least not without a lot more time and vetting.
American Thinker is where bloggers who coudln’t get anyone to read their bullshit elsewhere go in desperation to get their puny voices heard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.