Posted on 03/22/2025 8:23:53 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
In the last two months, Li has been all over the internet. An interview with Patrick Bet-David netted 2.5 million. As Bet-David noted, “A lot of people want to know, is she straight up, is she real?”
Now, here’s what troubles me. In her interviews, Li freely shares the story of her political evolution
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Ms. Li is too much too soon and Fox just had to run with her a la Linda Tripp who Monica outlived btw.
Jack sill, the author of this article is a conspiracy theorist.
“...Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?”
I say yes...absolutely!
“I say yes...absolutely!”
Yep, doesn’t pass the smell test.
Once a DemonRAT, always a DemonRAT. I don’t trust them. Any of them. They are all fascists.
David Brock was a handsome 28 year old when his book came out. Don’t know when HE came out but it feeds the salacious narrative. Now he’s all gray-haired and forgotten but he struck while the iron was hot and made his money.
We’re being played.
She is like a fair weather friend. Not trusted.
She came forward too late. AND she only brought information everyone already knew
What does she contribute to our side?
My first impression of her: “kind cold and slimy!”
“Kinda cold and slimy!” The key stuck.
I’m with you on this one.
And traitors.
>>Once a DemonRAT, always a DemonRAT. I don’t trust them. Any of them. They are all fascists.
Does that include Trump and Reagan?
Her interview with Shawn Ryan had me convinced. The Millennials believe her too.Many recovering Democrats feel like they need a 12 step program.These fires and the Trans arsonists are killing the party which will ultimately lead to the end of democracy which means Obama wins in the end.
I guess so.
You forgot Charleton Heston.
Brock and other authors of the American Spectator did some excellent reporting on the Clinton scandals—and then at some point they just stopped investigating.
Imho they were scared off/bribed/blackmailed—some combination.
He does make a good point... when Li was 13, Sestak was still in the Navy. But she may simply have been unclear, and saying that she was helping with political campaigns in general as young as 13, but not meaning specifically Sestak. I don’t want to comb through that long podcast to find that part of it to listen again.
I don’t think she’s a double agent. She seems to me to be a little emotionally unstable is all, and clearly anorexic. It’s not unlikely that she is truly an idealist whose idealism has been deeply wounded by what she’s seen. She doesn’t seem to be aware of the deeper, darker mechanisms of the DNC though, like voter fraud and assassination attempts and money laundering. Really, in the end, she just knows the gossip, who hates whom, who influences whom, that sort of thing.
“Had Li cited any other member of Congress, I would not have raised an eyebrow, but to admit working for Sestak and lying about her age at the time makes me suspicious. The Deep State created Joe Sestak. Could they have groomed Li at an early age to jump ship when the ship needed jumping?”
The author forgot to mention that li never switches hands when cutting her meat - it’s always knife in left hand and fork in the right hand. HMMM it looks like we’ve caught a double agent, but what value is she to the rodents? She has already done a ton of damage to them and if she had any “juicy” news to tell them - whom should she speak to? They don’t have a leader or a structure to “report to.”
Sorry Surrender Monkeys but this one woman is not bring Trump down take the weekend off and come out ready to root for Boasberg on Monday.
Another possibility, a woman scorned. And we all know about the saying of a woman scorned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.