Posted on 03/18/2025 9:29:06 AM PDT by Racketeer
And this is,
Josiah Waters @1201LLC was just on the @larryelder show, where he laid out Ilhan Omar as a fugitive of justice, as so did Minnesota Republican, State Rep. Steve Drazkowski.
They’ve got receipts—affidavits, emails, eviction notices, and documents—and the FBI and DOJ buried it.
— Waters is calling on @PamBondi and @Kash_Patel to restart the investigation and pursue for the arrest and prosecution of Ilhan Omar for defrauding the United States government.
Josiah Waters: The reason she is being protected is that if she goes down, everyone goes down—Democracy Partners, lawyers, activists… the very crime syndicate that has been protecting her.
Republican State Rep. Steve Drazkowski
— Demands for the arrest of Ilhan Omar for federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, incest, kickbacks and acts of campaign fraud abuse from east coast to the Mississippi River, Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago and Florida.
“She @Ilhan was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota campaign finance board and ordered to return those funds. Ms @IlhanMN appears to be a serial career criminal.”
“from the east coast to the Mississippi River”
In other words, From the Sea to the River.
How is the yes or no question of the headline misleading?
Do you not understand the meaning of fugitive?
Has she been charged of a crime? Is she actively evading law enforcement?
The answer to those questions is no, as far as I know. So, the answer, if my belief is correct, then the answer is clearly no, she is not a fugitive from justice.
Note that I did not say that she isn't guilty of the rumors that have been persistent for years now. But to say she is a fugitive from justice, is not true. If you know differently, then enlighten me of her charges & her active evasion of facing these charges. That's why I said the headline is misleading. There was no mention of her being charged or her evading law enforcement in the video I watched. In fact, the video seemed to imply that her status needs to be seriously examined, and that he has the receipts that need to be examined. So far, he says that evidence has been brushed off. Now my memory is not one of photographic, so my statements are of how my memory is trying to repeat it. I may be incorrect. Ah, the joys of aging. 😋
She’s the one who married her brother.
But no female prison deal with El Salvador, right?
;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.