Posted on 03/08/2025 5:02:44 AM PST by marcusmaximus
Republican Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, Friday on Fox News, called out the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) silence over the release of deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s full files and urged U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to publicize the remaining documents.
Following an uneventful release of the first phase of ‘The Epstein Files’ — an over 100-page document — which failed to contain a majority of new information, Bondi announced Monday that the DOJ had received thousands of missing documents. On “Jesse Watters Primetime,” Watters asked Luna, who is leading the House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, if she had heard any movement as to when the Epstein files will be released.
“I feel the same way that you do, Jesse. I’m very frustrated, just like many Americans are. I think that those lists need to be released to the American people. That’s really up to the decision of Attorney General Pam Bondi,” Luna said. “I can tell you that as a member of Congress, we have not really gotten much communication from the Department of Justice.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Ugly hat!
Not guilty!
I think you are right. International “agencies” may be involved and exposed.
i am not sure Bondi is right for the job. Trump needs a powerful DOJ and I am not seeing it yet with her.
Maybe she will improve, who knows?
There are bigger issues at hand right now.
Does anyone else think one ingredient in that international flavor might be Israel/Mossad.
Have you ever heard of video editing?
Just blur out the victims and show Congressman X in living color....then the unedited version can be shown to a judge in chambers or jury in closed session if there was a prosecution.
That said—such an exercise would take time.
I have no problem if Bondi uses it to do this correctly.
Affirmative.
“No common sense Americans really give a crap about the Epstein files...”
I disagree.
This “common sense” American cares very much if those in power were using that power and privilege to rape children, it speaks to character. I would also point out that the politicians who participated it are now fully owned by the people who have the evidence of their criminal depravity on tape. I’d like to know who those owned people, who are too much control over our live, are.
Of course time is needed.
Does anyone really believe Deep State willingly coughed up anything/anyone important to Deep State?
Trump will see this sorted.
In the meantime, when Deep State gins up yet another game of lets-you-and-him-fight, refuse to play.
I will have to let somebody else view it for me.
Republican office-holders, confronted with public revelations of their misdeeds, tend to resign immediately and slink away into the night. Democrats always pull a Schiff and try to brazen it out with angry denunciations of the accusers.
Thus, even if two or three times as many Democrats are named in the Epstein files, Republicans are much more likely to lose their Congressional majorities in the short run, allowing their President to be impeached, convicted, and removed. And this would set up a scenario where the brazen Democrats could dismiss the evidence of their own Epstein Island misdeeds as fake - with the legacy media 100% on board with Democrat spin.
The plan now seems to be to wait until after the midterms before releasing much information - if DOGE remains popular and the GOP achieves bigger majorities, we might see more details. There is still value in sitting on the information, as evildoers can be quietly reminded that the DoJ has enough take them out any time.
Perhaps more, about how domestic and foreign intel agencies control Congress and others.
You think you are being Machiavellian—but you are not being Machiavellian enough.
The administration has the files.
They can release the ones they want to release in the order they want to release them.
They can say that some other cases are under review so they cannot release them at this time.
I suppose that list will do a lot of damage, assuming the citizens actually care.
Why would it need to be redacted? Bondi is turning into the DOJ version of Amy Commie Barrett.
I hope you don’t mind if our side gets to use the Epstein files to blackmail members of Congress.
Lol.
Not at all. :)
Which is why I don’t expect to see it.
We assume that there are only Democrat and Dem celebrity names on that list. I think that they have found that there are some names on that list which will make many Republicans extremely uncomfortable.
I’m thinking the list does not run down one party line like we think...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.