Skip to comments.
Hoping to revive mammoths, scientists create 'woolly mice'
NPR ^
| March 04, 2025
| Rob Stein
Posted on 03/04/2025 7:22:32 AM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Red Badger
Those have already escaped the lab.
I saw a dark brown woolly mouse in my house.
21
posted on
03/04/2025 7:39:51 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Dutch Boy
Add the wooly coat and you’d really have something.
To: No name given
23
posted on
03/04/2025 7:42:16 AM PST
by
BipolarBob
(My goal is to lose 10 pounds this year. So far, only thirteen more to go.)
To: HartleyMBaldwin
24
posted on
03/04/2025 7:43:01 AM PST
by
dp0622
(Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
To: Red Badger
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear
Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn’t fuzzy
Was he
25
posted on
03/04/2025 7:43:14 AM PST
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: Red Badger
I thought the wooly mammoth would be revived by transplanting an intact cell nucleus from a frozen wooly mammoth into the ovum of an Indian elephant (their closest living relative). The egg would then be implanted in an Indian elephant. The result would be a genetic clone of a wooly mammoth that died thousands of years ago.
But what's being described is, as the article says, an effort to create "mammoth-like" creatures that would have a number of genetic traits from the actual wooly mammoths, but would not be the same creatures genetically. Still very cool but kind of a letdown.
To: Bob434
Dodos probably were against foreign rats from invading their island and destroying their habitat. So at least dodos are better than most of our politicians
27
posted on
03/04/2025 7:44:32 AM PST
by
escapefromboston
(Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
To: escapefromboston
apparently they are working on that too...
To: Red Badger
Why does the world need hairy elephants? Why would you waste talent and treasure to invent something nobody wants or needs?
If they really must play with genetics, why don't they make chickens that lay three eggs a day or cows that grow twice as much sirloin steak meat?
Unless fake mammoth meat is really tasty...
29
posted on
03/04/2025 7:58:03 AM PST
by
ZOOKER
To: tumblindice
Wooly Bully!..................
30
posted on
03/04/2025 7:58:10 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Red Badger
31
posted on
03/04/2025 8:00:59 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: escapefromboston
Yeah I shouldnta dissed dodo,birds like I did- my bad
32
posted on
03/04/2025 8:01:50 AM PST
by
Bob434
(...Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
To: Red Badger
What would be the purpose? To busy trying to find out how, not willing to consider if they really should.
33
posted on
03/04/2025 8:02:23 AM PST
by
exnavy
(See article IV section 4 of our constitution.)
To: Red Badger
I want a mini-giraffe.
34
posted on
03/04/2025 8:04:02 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: escapefromboston
Thats a good idea, certainly better than dinking around with the genome of already threatened creatures like that genius above suggests.
Dodos would have a short life cycle and after produced a million or so could be bred quite quickly to look for genetically created diseases we may have accidentally created or other research like getting an idea of the real effect these creatures would have on different environments before being released anywhere.
And who knows? They might actually taste good or at least palatably different as many fowl do. If you had a million (magic number) and they dressed at 10lbs (because that makes the math easy) and you sold them for $10/lb (chickens dont but this would be trendy at first) then you would have quite reserve for propelling future work.
If we screw something up and some do get away we should be able to retrieve them easily, they arent likely to destroy much, and we dont lose another species if we wind up at square one.
What kind of PR nightmare are they going to create for this type of work if the first couple have temperaments like african elephants and yank the limbs of of a couple of researchers at feeding time? I dont think that losing researchers or difficulty in the news cycle is such a big risk with dodos. Its might actually be the opposite because Gen Z knows that dodos are wacky survivalist types with a humorous form of martial arts and who wouldnt want to fund that?
35
posted on
03/04/2025 8:16:08 AM PST
by
gnarledmaw
(If you dont like my sense of humor, please let me know so I can laugh at you too.)
To: Bob434
We can’t even manage bison and wolves.
This just smacks of science masturbation.
36
posted on
03/04/2025 8:26:21 AM PST
by
larrytown
(A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
To: Dutch Boy
37
posted on
03/04/2025 8:28:19 AM PST
by
protest1
To: Red Badger
This is more like selective breeding. It is not actually bring a mammoth back to life at all.
"bringing a woolly mammoth-LIKE creature back from extinction"
This would be a new breed so nothing is "back from extinction"
38
posted on
03/04/2025 8:32:56 AM PST
by
protest1
To: Red Badger
39
posted on
03/04/2025 8:42:15 AM PST
by
Larry Lucido
(Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
To: sevlex
40
posted on
03/04/2025 8:43:15 AM PST
by
Larry Lucido
(Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson