Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The DOGE dividend could become law: ‘The proposed bill will be coming in the next few days’
NY Post ^ | 2/27/25 | Lydia Moynihan

Posted on 02/28/2025 1:34:06 AM PST by Libloather

The proposal for a “DOGE dividend,” which would distribute 20% of government savings to taxpayers, has gained support from President Trump and Elon Musk — and now it could potentially be enshrined in law, The Post has learned.

The 28-year-old hedge fund manager behind the idea, James Fishback, told The Post he met with Elon Musk last week and began meeting with lawmakers about his idea earlier this week.

“The president supports this and Elon likes the idea of incentivizing people to report waste, fraud, and abuse,” Fishback told me. “The proposed bill will be coming in the next few days.”

He added, “This approach will save taxpayers even more money — it would compound the returns that doge is finding.”

Under Fishback’s proposal, households that are net taxpayers — those who pay into the government more than they receive in benefits — would receive 20% of all DOGE’s saving.

Another 20% will go to paying down the national debt and the other 60% would likely be allocated to the budget each year (Fishback doesn’t explicitly state that).

According to his math that would mean roughly 79 million households would get a $5,000 check each if Musk is able to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget he’s estimated he can trim.

Fishback has previously suggested the first check would come when DOGE terminates in July 2026, but if it become law before then, he said, Americans could get a check even sooner.

The idea gained traction after Fishback initially posted about the idea on X.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: 100percenttodebt; bill; debt; deficit; dividend; doge; inflation; law; payola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: eastforker

They should definitely lower taxes. Trump had mentioned no tax on overtime, that would really help me. I hope he follows through on this— Trump says a lot of things.


21 posted on 02/28/2025 4:27:06 AM PST by Strict9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Leftist commies should protest

Only people who a ‘net taxpayers’ would get a check

22 posted on 02/28/2025 4:35:13 AM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Ditto


23 posted on 02/28/2025 4:37:38 AM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

And the $5000 must be tax exempt.


24 posted on 02/28/2025 4:44:04 AM PST by cyclotic (Don’t be part of the problem. Be the entire problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall Wall Texan

And the American people, who have had their livelihoods stolen from them by politicians deserve some restitution.


25 posted on 02/28/2025 4:47:07 AM PST by cyclotic (Don’t be part of the problem. Be the entire problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I’m personally going to consider 5k back as a small payment for “TECH SUPPORT” rendered by an American taxpayer. American taxpayers are now ALL “TECH SUPPORT” so let’s get with it and keep this ball rolling.


26 posted on 02/28/2025 4:49:27 AM PST by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think, the whole thing should go to pay the debt!
We are broke!


27 posted on 02/28/2025 5:08:23 AM PST by AZJeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Not households...taxpayers!...regardless of filings.


28 posted on 02/28/2025 5:10:03 AM PST by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sadly, everybody loves some good ole Government tit money. Just print some more and give it away. What a stupid idea.


29 posted on 02/28/2025 5:14:00 AM PST by Thomas Jerome (noob,retread,seagull,Chuck Schumer etc...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strict9
'According to his math that would mean roughly 79 million households would get a $5,000 check '

Article says households, not individuals. These guys haven't hardly cut at all. The largest expenditures are the four horsemen of the budget: SSI, DoD, Medicare, Medicaid. Then interest on debt.

Gimmicks right now, to cut 2 Trillion would be cuts on those, that hasn't happened. These guys saying massive cuts are sounding like used car sales men.

You cut 2 Trillion in a year, you will have to use any extra revenue to handle a massive recession. We've been propping up the economy with extra spending for decades.

30 posted on 02/28/2025 5:46:12 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

The best dividend you could give the US Citizen is the replacement of the income tax with a consumption tax.

What it would cure, in very short order, is the distortion in the money supply. A relatively high consumption tax would get people to direct their extra windfall toward saving and paying their way out of the holes they’ve made.

Between tariffs and consumption tax, the amount you pay in tax becomes discretionary instead of compulsory. The money placed in savings would come out of the money supply, taking the pressure of using interest rates as a means of regulating inflation.

Also, it’s not going to ‘cost’ the government anything. I very much dislike the USG giving me a check knowing at this point that money is still borrowed.

Get to the point where it is a real dividend. Repeal Income Tax. Stand back and watch the economy expand organically.


31 posted on 02/28/2025 5:52:31 AM PST by RinaseaofDs (Imagine what we'll know tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
If you want a more efficient government, then a consumption tax is the way to go. A consumption tax would ‘capture’ more taxes via illegal alien spending, black markets, and tourist.
32 posted on 02/28/2025 5:56:06 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Strict9

House, hold not individuals


33 posted on 02/28/2025 6:06:18 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tall Wall Texan

We wouldn’t be getting back a piece of “our money”, -just a taste of the huge deficit we have. Let them apply any savings to the national debt and stop the insane spending level we have.


34 posted on 02/28/2025 6:33:13 AM PST by Hartlyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A dumb idea. Any “give back” from any DOGE results, savings, will come to all taxpayers by way of not needing higher taxes to pay off all the debt. That’s good enough.


35 posted on 02/28/2025 7:02:02 AM PST by Wuli (qq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

+1

This law would engage the public and incentivize efficiency.

Right now there’s only motivation to spend more and more money that we don’t have. The only people against this are liberals who want massive government because its the weapon they use to control us.


36 posted on 02/28/2025 7:04:40 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Musk is a business guy, like Trump. They will always be optimistic about everything.

Some sort of audit needs to happen on DOGE savings. Claims of big numbers are headed towards needless humiliation if that money is not there.

Firing probationary employees has merit for sure, but they do not tend to be at the high end of the salary scales. Is big money really going to be found from this? I would guess someone is using “average pay for a Federal worker” to do the calculation and probationary types are far below the average pay level.


37 posted on 02/28/2025 7:12:44 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Owen

The key to understanding federal personnel cuts is that that means there are less employees cranking out regulations that cripple productive Americans.

That in turn will jump start the economy which will generate big numbers in new tax revenue.

Static state budget analysis is very misleading.


38 posted on 02/28/2025 7:14:49 AM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

But quantifying that would be imagination.

When you start talking about dollars refunded and dollars into the debt, those numbers will not be imagination.

An audit has to measure what DOGE claims. Concrete results, not ideological or imaginary.


39 posted on 02/28/2025 7:22:05 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Owen

We need both detailed numbers and a little “imagination”.

We can walk and chew gum at the same time.


40 posted on 02/28/2025 7:28:17 AM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson