Posted on 02/20/2025 6:12:51 PM PST by Libloather
The NFL, MLB, NCAA and NASCAR said they support a bill introduced in Congress on Thursday that would give state and local law enforcement the ability to disable drones during sporting events, which the leagues say have become an increasing threat.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nevada) and entitled the Disabling Enemy Flight Entry and Neutralizing Suspect Equipment (DEFENSE) Act, would provide "the tools for local and state law enforcement to protect citizens," Cotton told ESPN.
"Local law enforcement already protects the perimeter of these events," he said. "We already expect them to stop a dump truck that would cause harm, so we need to also give them the tools to protect the airspace from weapons and biological threats."
Currently, only federal law enforcement on-site at events such as the Super Bowl, the World Series, the Rose Bowl and the Boston Marathon can disable unauthorized drones. Nearly all other major sporting events, including thousands of NFL and MLB games, do not have officials on-site with the legal authorization to quickly remove a drone threat.
(Excerpt) Read more at espn.com ...
If one dropped on a drive or in the crowd if could be devastating. Get them out.
I don’t want drones over my house either
Common sense...
Add Airports and Fire Fighters (when battling open acres of fires).
Wife and I were at a NCAA football playoff game last in Indianapolis and there were several drones patrolling over the crowd, they had camera and would pause just a few feet over the crowd and slowly scan for a moment then move on.
“Watched a Charlotte race where they ran a cable from turn four to turn one. Great moving camera shots from there. Cable snapped. Damaged some cars. One and done.”
NASCAR uses drones.
I agree with you. Sure, but if it is ok for one business or property owner to exclude drones make it ok for all.
Similar to the modern view that freedom of the press is for established media organizations, rather than anybody who wants to publish.
Rights should not be crony carve-outs.
No problem here. It should be trespassing
What about planes, or helicopters, or satellites ?
I am wondering if they are doing this just so they could make up ANOTHER acronym.
The cable cams were used several times before the incident in Concord happened. Stepson was at that Race.
can disable unauthorized drones.
- - -
So how are they disabled?
Shotgun, laser, jam the frequency, or?
And how to disable some and not others?
Do the drones have some ID type address that can be singled out? If so can the drone pilot turn that off?
What about the venue themselves? Should they not be able to fly drones while running their events?
What about a 3rd party the venue hired?
What about a contractor the 3rd party hired on behalf of the venue?
Maybe we need to require a license for ANY drone usage (expand the current 107 FAA license for ALL drone flight)?
Maybe we need to require a license just to purchase any drone?
I think this becomes a slippery slope. Once the camels nose is in the tent, it’s too late.
How about instead, we don’t allow any people into the country who have the slightest chance of wanting to harm us? How about allowing serious social, economic and cultural consequences for being an anti-social, un-American spazz?
We didn’t have these types of worries in the 40’s and 50’s (and thus enjoyed extreme freedom) because we were a homogenous monoculture with very severe repercussions for anti-social behavior.
That was 2013. Why the emphasis?
Remember “Black Sunday”, they don’t need a blimp anymore.
“What about the venue themselves? Should they not be able to fly drones while running their events?
What about a 3rd party the venue hired?
What about a contractor the 3rd party hired on behalf of the venue?”
What about them?
My point was...
It’s already illegal to hurt people with drones.
We already have restrictions on commercial use of drones.
They already have federal officials at these big events.
They already have the ability to take down drones they think are threats.
What more do they want to do???
Any new law is just going to be used to restrict normal American’s freedoms.
I would note that Rand Paul shut down the first iteration of these new drone laws. He usually has good instincts on preserving liberty.
Instead of responding to perceived threats by passing laws to restrict what Americans can do, how about we figure out why there are so many people in our midst that want to do normal Americans harm and deal with those people.
Fixed.
Fixed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.