I agree with you. Sure, but if it is ok for one business or property owner to exclude drones make it ok for all.
Similar to the modern view that freedom of the press is for established media organizations, rather than anybody who wants to publish.
Rights should not be crony carve-outs.
No problem here. It should be trespassing
What about the venue themselves? Should they not be able to fly drones while running their events?
What about a 3rd party the venue hired?
What about a contractor the 3rd party hired on behalf of the venue?
Maybe we need to require a license for ANY drone usage (expand the current 107 FAA license for ALL drone flight)?
Maybe we need to require a license just to purchase any drone?
I think this becomes a slippery slope. Once the camels nose is in the tent, it’s too late.
How about instead, we don’t allow any people into the country who have the slightest chance of wanting to harm us? How about allowing serious social, economic and cultural consequences for being an anti-social, un-American spazz?
We didn’t have these types of worries in the 40’s and 50’s (and thus enjoyed extreme freedom) because we were a homogenous monoculture with very severe repercussions for anti-social behavior.