Posted on 02/12/2025 4:43:41 AM PST by MtnClimber
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to restore pro-gender ideology webpages after they were deleted in the wake of President Trump’s executive order banning government agencies from promoting gender ideology, CBS News reported Tuesday.
Trump’s EO, signed on his first day in office, stated that the U.S. recognizes two sexes, male and female, and directed agencies to “remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology,” as well as “cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages.”
Days after the president issued his order, the Office of Personnel Management issued a memorandum ordering all agencies by 5 p.m. on Jan. 31 to take down all websites, social media accounts and other public-facing media “that inculcate or promote gender ideology.” In response to the memo, the CDC and FDA took offline numerous webpages and data sets, including recommendations on how physicians should treat sexually transmitted infections and adult immunization guidance.
While the wording on some websites was adjusted to adhere to Mr. Trump’s directive, allowing them to stay online, other information, like data from the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, was removed completely.
The agency said in a banner on its main website that it was “being modified to comply with President Trump’s executive orders.”
U.S. District Judge John Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, granted a temporary restraining order sought by the left-wing nonprofit Doctors for America (originally Doctors For Obama). The activist group was founded in 2008 by Dr. Vivek Murthy, who went on to become Joe Biden’s surgeon general. Doctors For America argued that its members had used the websites for treating patients and conducting research and that the removal of the webpages violated federal law.
Bates, 78, found that the group was likely to succeed in its claim that HHS, the CDC and FDA acted unlawfully when they scrubbed transgender ideology from their public websites.
“It bears emphasizing who ultimately bears the harm of defendants’ actions: everyday Americans, and most acutely, underprivileged Americans, seeking healthcare,” he wrote. Citing declarations from two doctors filed in the case, Bates said if they “cannot provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions. The public thus has a strong interest in avoiding these serious injuries to the public health.”
Judge John Bates was the judge in the tragic case of Matthew Perna, the j6er who hung himself after Biden DOJ prosecutors sadistically threw the book at him for peacefully trespassing.
The judge said that after the gender ideology info was taken down, doctors were forced to look elsewhere for such material, making “their jobs harder and their treatment less effective,” but that HHS, CDC and FDA faced no burden by keeping the webpages up.
“There is nothing in either the OPM memorandum or the record, and indeed defendants proffered no information at the hearing, to suggest the restoration of the removed webpages would pose a burden on the agencies’ ability to engage in their work,” Bates wrote. “Similarly, there is no information to suggest that restoring public access would even interfere with the agencies’ ongoing efforts to conform those resources with the president’s executive orders.”
The judge ordered the agencies to restore earlier versions of their websites by 11:59 p.m. Tuesday.
Senator Mike Lee registered his disapproval of the judge’s decision on X: “These judges are waging an unprecedented assault on legitimate presidential authority, all the way down to dictating what webpages the government has,” Lee wrote. “This is absurd.”
Reacting with equal dismay, DOGE Chief Elon Musk called for Judge Bates to be fired.
“Truly absurd. Judges as website editors!?” he posted on X. “We should at least ATTEMPT to fire this junky jurist.” He added: “The notion of having a judge job for life, no matter how bad the judgments, is ridiculous! Enough is enough.”
Right. Why even have a President if ‘judges’ can override his authority and dictate policy??
Re: 15 - the judge has no standing because standing is something that the parties have (in this case).
I guess judges control everything including the office bulletin board
Time to investigate judges finances and internet activity, leftist are deviants and they can’t help themselves.
Time to send big balls their way
I know I’m abusing the concept of “standing” in approximately the judgie-poo is abusing the constitution: Making a mockery of the whole point of it.
Corrected: I know I’m abusing the concept of “standing” in approximately the same way that the judgie-poo is abusing the nature of constitution: Making a mockery of the whole point of it.
I’ll wager whatever you like that USSC does not reverse- as it won’t get that far.
Come on people, do some reading!
As posted in another thread:
The data on the website(s) is public data subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, a Federal Law.
That data, once public, can’t be removed without adhering the Administrative Procedures Act - another Federal Law.
The Executive Branch just can’t remove the data is what the Plaintiffs allege - I believe they have the stronger case at present.
Here’s the case - read!
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/
I understand and get your point. Cases tossed for lack of standing have increased the last 30-40 years.
So have nationwide injunctions - which are an issue that needs to be addressed.
There’s no Constitutional mandate to require it.
It can be safely ignored.
“At least 95% of our lawyers...and judges...are Maoists.”
The legal education system needs repair.
Perhaps a new system of mainly online federal legal training should be required to be able to practice before or in federal courts below the Supreme Court level.
Perhaps our new Attorney General might be able to get the existing legal education system to change. Congress might give the Attorney General the power to set law school federal student loan and aid caps.
blah blah blah
This needed to come to a head anyway.
Re: 29 - maybe, just maybe Congress should pass laws that are meaningful and aren’t so convoluted that they are used in a manner that, well, Congress wrote they could be used.
How much does the federal government spend providing courthouse security?
I suspect many of you would happily provide security at half the wage cost per guard.
Nope.
“The data on the website(s) is public data subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, a Federal Law.”
“That data, once public, can’t be removed without adhering the Administrative Procedures Act - another Federal Law.”
In February 2020 I read that masks were worthless.
A few months later I read that they needed to be used.
There is.......impeachment................
post it in cursive.
The information I posted in 19 is accurate.
If Dr. Quack wants to testify under oath in a federal court otherwise, I’m sure Pam Bondi would be delighted.
The National Weather Service updates webpages rapidly.
The NOAA updates webpages rapidly.
? - I was not commenting on 19.
“Sorry, that server has been removed from the network and data destroyed”
Like, with a dust cloth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.