Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump conveys ‘serious’ and ‘firm’ desire to acquire Greenland in call with Danish PM: ‘Danes now in crisis mode’
NY Post ^ | 1/24/25 | Diana Glebova

Posted on 01/24/2025 5:42:05 PM PST by Libloather

President Trump had a “firm” phone conversation with Denmark’s prime minister last week to convey his serious intentions of acquiring Greenland, according to a report citing officials privy to the talk.

Trump has been aggressive in his desire to make Greenland a US territory to bolster national security in the Arctic region — and has even refused to rule out using “military force” to get it.

The Danish government, which has ownership of the largest island in the world, has said Greenland is not for sale and will not be a part of the US.

Trump’s conversation with Danish PM Mette Fredericksen, in which he stood unwavering behind his intentions, did not go well, European sources familiar with the discussion told the Financial Times.

“It was horrendous,” a source said.

Another source said Trump “was very firm.

“It was a cold shower. Before, it was hard to take it seriously. But I do think it is serious, and potentially, very dangerous,” the person said.

A third source told the outlet, “The intent was very clear.

“[Trump officials] want it. The Danes are now in crisis mode.”

A fourth said, “The Danes are utterly freaked out by this.”

Trump’s team had previously relayed to The Post that the president was “100% serious” in his intentions on Greenland and also retaking the Panama Canal.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News; Outdoors; Travel
KEYWORDS: crisis; danish; denmark; europeanunion; greenland; nato; secondhandanonymous; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: packagingguy

“...simply sign a mutual defense treaty...”

They already have. We have things up there already.

wy69


41 posted on 01/24/2025 8:51:29 PM PST by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

We already have bases there, that’s all we need.


42 posted on 01/25/2025 12:02:26 AM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

They could overwhelm us with rotten herring...


43 posted on 01/25/2025 2:40:54 AM PST by Adder (End fascism...defeat all Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Trigger alert!

Guy asks girl out for a date. She is now in crisis mode. The whole danged government.


44 posted on 01/25/2025 5:16:51 AM PST by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

A poll of the 55,000 residents, who are mostly tribal entities, found that 30,000 in favor of becoming Americans and 20,000 did not.


45 posted on 01/25/2025 7:29:03 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

sign a mutual defense treaty

Not good enough.


46 posted on 01/25/2025 7:30:26 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond

Greenland has natural resources that can be exploited. But this requires investment. It has a very harsh climate, and no infrastructure to speak of, and any investment in these things could lead to catastrophic losses if the geopolitical winds blow in a different direction.

Investment requires faith and confidence in the political and legal (and possibly military) systems to protect the investors’ rights. Even the Danish government may not be willing to spend a lot to exploit these resources out of fear of financial loss that might come through geopolitical forces.

Denmark can profit from Greenland by selling it and letting us exploit its natural resources. We are also the most logical country to control it from a military standpoint to ensure regional stability. It is an American island.

There is a tremendous opportunity cost for continuing with business as usual. Greenland’s natural resources sit idle, robbing the world of wealth creation that will benefit everyone.

There is a strategic military advantage to us owning Greenland, but there is an economic advantage. Who else could, would, or should be the nation to manage this economic advantage? Russia? China? Europe?

President Trump’s pursuit is visionary.

America is the logical choice.


47 posted on 01/25/2025 7:34:48 AM PST by unlearner (Still not tired of winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Military age = 18 for voluntary service
Conscription = Yes, for men and women.
Available for military service = 2,605,137, age 18–49 (2023)
Fit for military service = 2,107,794, age 18–49 (2023)
Reaching military age annually = 76,970 (2023)
Active personnel = 21,000 military & 4,638 civilian (2024)
Reserve personnel = 12,000 + 51,000 volunteers in the Home Guard
Deployed personnel = 800 (2024)

the military retains the capability to continually deploy 2,000 soldiers in international service or 5,000 over a short time span.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_Defence


48 posted on 01/25/2025 7:36:08 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CaliGangsta

from Russia or Chicom invasion


Russia might invade, if it had the manpower, which it does not; China will simply buy its way to taking over with its Belt and Road initiative.


49 posted on 01/25/2025 7:38:11 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

The Danes don’t really care about Greenland and would or could do nothing if the Chinese were to establish some kind of foothold there

already have:
Shenghe Resources Holdings from China holds a significant stake in Greenland Minerals, making it a notable foreign investor in Greenland’s mining sector.

Like all other Chinese companies, Shenghe Resources Holdings is owned by the CCP and the PLA.


50 posted on 01/25/2025 7:41:48 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Getready

Skiing in Greenland.


Be sure to pack a rifle of large handgun for when you meet the island’s resident polar bears.


51 posted on 01/25/2025 7:43:41 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PIF
Thank you for the Danish military tally. As the citation notes, Denmark can "continually deploy 2,000 soldiers in international service or 5,000 over a short time span."

Awe-inspiring. "Tooth to tail" calculations suggest that only a portion of those dispatched would be combat efficient.

Your other comment that China might try to "belt and road" Greenland is apt. But a notion that Greenland can be defended by Denmark is a bit of good humor for the day.

52 posted on 01/25/2025 7:45:17 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

no infrastructure to speak of


There is 40 miles of paved road! Heh.

If we could acquire BC and the Yukon, we would have Canada surrounded.


53 posted on 01/25/2025 7:46:30 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The Danes really can't do much with Greenland, so I don't know why they're trying so hard to hold onto it.

I think they'd be better off if we traded Puerto Rico for Greenland. We get the security of having territory in the Arctic, and the Danes get a Caribbean vacation resort island to get away from all the Scandanavian cold winters.

President Trump can even throw in constructing a luxury hotel and world-class golf club to sweeten the deal.

It's a win-win for everybody!

-PJ

54 posted on 01/25/2025 7:47:50 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

Only 7.8% Danish.


55 posted on 01/25/2025 7:51:13 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
The Danes really can't do much with Greenland, so I don't know why they're trying so hard to hold onto it.

The Danes should have contracted the Americans in the '50s and started to extract natural resources. At the same time, build a naval base there.

But they didn't do that so they don't really own it.

One day, the Chinese or the Russians can just show up to Greenland and they'll take it.

56 posted on 01/25/2025 7:54:03 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bobbyvotes

Or illegals from Mexico, Latin America and South America.


57 posted on 01/25/2025 12:20:35 PM PST by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

You don’t need to own it to acquire mineral rights. But it’s not globalism when Trump does it, I guess.


58 posted on 01/25/2025 1:08:06 PM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond

“But it’s not globalism when Trump does it, I guess.”

I fail to see how acquiring Greenland advances globalism.


59 posted on 01/25/2025 6:24:21 PM PST by unlearner (Still not tired of winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mogger
Our flag is fine right now. One more star would goof it up.

Why would we be adding a star? If Denmark does sell it to us, that makes it a territory, not a State. There's a whole other process to then become a State. There's reasons Puerto Rico hasn't tried to hit State hood yet, there are benefits to not doing so. And the current smallest State, Wyoming, has about ten times the population or Greenland. Not very likely to happen in the near future.
60 posted on 01/26/2025 5:49:13 PM PST by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson