Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bryan Kohberger’s lawyers ask for nearly all evidence to be tossed in Idaho student murders case
NY Post ^ | 01/23/2025 | Fox News

Posted on 01/23/2025 9:38:59 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger is expected to return to a courtroom this week ahead of his summer murder trial for the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students in November 2022.

A hearing Thursday will consider 12 suppression motions filed by Kohberger’s defense.

It will be the first time Kohberger has been back in court in over two months, when his defense team asked a Boise judge to “sanction” prosecutors over “inadequate disclosures” through the discovery process.

His defense team is requesting expert witnesses be excluded from the case as a solution.

His team is attempting to have nearly all the evidence collected by police against Kohberger thrown out by challenging the legality of search warrants.

They are arguing the probable cause on which the search warrants were based was established primarily by the police use of investigative genetic genealogy (IGG), which they believe amounts to a violation of Kohberger’s Fourth Amendment rights.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Local News; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: bryankohberger; case; evidence; fingerprints; forensicevidence; fourthamendment; genealogy; gettherope; helixmakemineadouble; hesguilty; idaho; kohbergers; lawyers; murders; newyorkpost; shakespearewasright; students; tossed; uofidaho; yeahno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
What could be wrong with the search warrants?
1 posted on 01/23/2025 9:38:59 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

They are reaching. Investigative genealogy has been court approved in many previous cases around the country.


2 posted on 01/23/2025 9:43:21 AM PST by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

6 th paragraph.


3 posted on 01/23/2025 9:43:59 AM PST by gundog (The ends justify the mean tweets. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Lawyers are claiming that probable cause based on investigative genetic geneology is a violation of his 4th ammendment rights.

This is a hail mary.


4 posted on 01/23/2025 9:46:16 AM PST by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27; SaveFerris; Larry Lucido


5 posted on 01/23/2025 9:48:21 AM PST by gundog (The ends justify the mean tweets. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam

They’re doing what defense attorneys do......exhaust all avenues to get the case thrown out before AND during thectrial.......to me defense attorneys can pull some really dirty stuff to get their clients off, but like it or not this here IS what they are getting paid for.


6 posted on 01/23/2025 9:50:02 AM PST by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!ly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

According to the article, the suppression motion is based on the argument that when the police used DNA evidence as probable cause for the warrant(s), they violated the suspect’s 4th Amendment right to be secure from any unreasonable search and seizure. I suppose the question then is does a person have a reasonable expectation that their genetic information, or such DNA they might have left behind in a place outside of their dwelling, will remain private. I think not, and the argument verges on being frivolous.


7 posted on 01/23/2025 9:51:01 AM PST by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam

In the immortal words of legendary courtroom lion Jimmy Durante, “that’s irrelevant, immemorial, and a bare faced lie.”


8 posted on 01/23/2025 9:52:42 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

“This is a hail mary.”

Agreed but in not arguing this they would be derelict in their representation......any decent lawyer would do the exact same thing.

And if/when this goes to trial one of the first things the defense will do is request the case be thrown out.

Common procedural practice.


9 posted on 01/23/2025 9:54:25 AM PST by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!ly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN
They’re doing what defense attorneys do......exhaust all avenues to get the case thrown out...

BAM! as Emeril would say.
10 posted on 01/23/2025 10:17:03 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

already been determined long ago that if you throw something away you lose all rights to it, including DNA on those items.


11 posted on 01/23/2025 10:17:42 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Worth a shot - especially given that the known evidence looks pretty damning.


12 posted on 01/23/2025 10:32:45 AM PST by larrytown (A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Valpal1 wrote: “Lawyers are claiming that probable cause based on investigative genetic geneology is a violation of his 4th ammendment rights.”

Multiple freepers made the same/similar claim when this technique first surfaced a few years ago.


13 posted on 01/23/2025 10:33:14 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam

THAT kind of DNA testing is a GAME CHANGER.

HE IS GOING TO LOSE THAT ARGUMENT-—

Which will help set new precedent for other future cases.


14 posted on 01/23/2025 10:39:09 AM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

THIS WORSE===

TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING THIS DEFENSE ATTORNEY

This guy is very dangerous.

NOT sure this is his only bad behavior.


15 posted on 01/23/2025 10:40:38 AM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Yep only Mary is not someone Kohberger has had the pleasure of knowing.

Trial date is set for July and his lawyer’s got nothing but heck throw out everything....please!


16 posted on 01/23/2025 11:12:06 AM PST by Beowulf9 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Every time I think about the murderer - a Criminal Justice graduate student - I have to laugh in disbelief.

He lived in Pullman, Washington, a college town, in a Hard Left, No Death Penalty state.

He deliberately crossed the state line to murder four college students in Idaho, a Republican, Death Penalty state.

Most amazing of all, he stole or borrowed a hunting knife and sheath from his father.

Somehow, he left the sheath at the crime scene. The Police found his father's DNA on the sheath.

This is stupid piled on top of even more stupid.

Idaho executes by lethal injection.

If lethal injections are outlawed, the fall back is a firing squad.

I am rooting for the firing squad. I know that has to really hurt for a second or two before you lose consciousness.

17 posted on 01/23/2025 11:54:55 AM PST by zeestephen (Trump Landslide? Kamala lost Wisc, Mich, and Penn, by 230,000 votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I live in Spokane. Went to Moscow, ID a few years ago. Very small for a capitol city, just a nice little town with friendly people. Unimaginable that such horrible murders were committed there.

I vote for a firing squad too. Or better yet, off with his head.


18 posted on 01/23/2025 1:09:49 PM PST by Veto! (Kamalala Sux Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Truly arrogant and narcissistic choices.


19 posted on 01/23/2025 1:23:12 PM PST by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

IMO, most of this case is bogus. Those kids were killed by domestic surveillance, why, I have no idea. But too much was hinky there, especially the dude following them the night before saying “They will get you for this Kaylee!”

https://americanstasi.com/chapter-nine-using-surveillance-detection-the-moscow-idaho-college-murders/


20 posted on 01/26/2025 7:19:31 PM PST by AnonymousConservative (DO NOT send me sensitive info, I'm under surveillance by Domestic Intel http://www.AmericanStasi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson