Now the globalist marxists have set their sights on Americans and are importing millions of foreigners to divide subjugate and steal the wealth of all Americans under the guise of fake compassion for their shock troops of invading foreigners. The courts have let Americans down and actively rule against them. While the election of Trump offers hope we must wait and see if Trump can deliver on his promises. The courts have been and are attacking Americans and electing Republicans has not worked so far. What is next?
We have tried jury box and the ballot box and if those fail will Americans be forced to use the cartridge box?
We won at the ballot box. Let’s see how JAN 20th starts off before dragging up the cartridge box. :0)
They’ve squelched the soap box and corrupted the ballot box. No wonder they’re so concerned about regulating the bullet box.
WHAT ABOUT THE ALMIGHTY SOAP BOX?
Forgot the Soap Box first.
I agree with your premises about the state of our Union and its current disarray.
But I hardly would agree that Douglas was a “liberal” in the classic tradition. I believe that Douglas was a patriot
of the UNited STates just as Samual Adams was.Boith of their heir lights were fueled by a thirst for freedom and the means to secure it. I do not believe that makes either of them “liberals” in the classic sense.It makes them into something new, patriots of freedom established under an enlightened approach to government withe the freedom of the individual citizen and his pursuit of happiness as the major focus.. Much of this was a result of observing how native Americans governed themselves, secured themselves, such as the Mohawks and the Iroquois Confederacy, much more than following what John Locke had to say.
By example I will give you the words of another patriot who was much like Douglas, although he was from a much different background, he too highly esteemed freedom like Douglas.
His name is Samuel Adams, and here is some of what he had to say on August 1st 1776 at the Philadelphia State House:
“
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: first, a right to life; secondly, to liberty; thirdly to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.
The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men. “
Another was Francis Marion, the Swampfox.These types of men were the foundations of freedom in Amwerica, and they were neither progressives nor liberals.They were something entirely different on the face of this earth.They were American patriots.We should be proud to number ourselves among them.
False!
It has been many decades since the first two items were true...
I guess if all else fails, many will reach for the cartridge box as the last resort. I only pray it never comes to that.
I've actually given this a fair amount of thought.
What good is the cartridge box in modern times? Against whom to we fight? Representatives of government and, now, industry, are well-protected. What sort of defense against small drones can a typical person raise? We certainly cannot assemble, what with the ability of modern government to monitor communications, disrupt plans, and protect themselves. It was much different in the 1700's, 1800's, and even the early 1900's. Then, we had a clear shot.
Unless we were able to muster overwhelming numbers -- only reasonable if we were invaded by a foreign nation -- then we would likely be picked off. Remember the numbers.... even in the 1700's, only 3% or so were ready and willing to rebel. We'd need some sort of critical mass to become ungovernable and directly/physically rebellious.
Personally, to me, it seems that firearms are only useful for local defensive combat. If the government sent teams, or if the SHTF and you were defending your bugout spot from local looters, then they'd be quite useful. Other than that, I cannot think of how they could be employed successfully.
Oh sure, one or two people could create an incident or two. They, of course, would be painted as extremist loons, and unless there was a level of universal anger among the populace, their sacrifice would not be a spark of something bigger.
I don't feel we can think tactically. I feel we need to be far more strategic in our thinking.