Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Panama Canal threats designed to scuttle China influence
The Washington Post ^ | December 24, 2024 8:51 a.m. EST | Karen DeYoung

Posted on 12/24/2024 10:37:36 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

President-elect Donald Trump’s threat last weekend to reclaim the Panama Canal was designed to make clear that “decades of U.S. commerce financing China’s growth and strategic footprint in the Americas is over,” according to a senior Trump appointee.

Successive administrations have allowed a “vacuum of control and influence” in the Western Hemisphere, Mauricio Claver-Carone, named by Trump as his incoming administration’s special envoy for Latin America, said Monday.

But those earlier administrations also included Trump’s first term, when his policy in the hemisphere focused primarily on migration and sanctions against Venezuela, even as Panama severed diplomatic relations with Taiwan and established ties with China in 2017. That opened the door to Chinese investments and companies that were already winning bids for major infrastructure projects elsewhere in the region.

Trump’s recent comments may reflect a newly muscular interpretation of his America First policy amid rising alarm about what the commander of U.S. forces in the region this year called China’s significant presence on America’s “20-yard-line.” At the same time, the incoming administration may see Latin America as an easier place to exert foreign policy pressure — or at least the image of toughness — than some other parts of the world.

Following declarations that the canal was a “vital” U.S. “national asset,” Trump made a similar claim Sunday on another part of the hemisphere. In a social media post, he said that U.S. “ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity” for American national security and for “Freedom throughout the World.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 12/24/2024 10:37:36 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dear Washington Post,

Greenland is kind of a fun idea. The Canal takes priority.


2 posted on 12/24/2024 10:48:17 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Doesn’t Greenland already belong to Canada , maybe the US and Canada can share, LOL


3 posted on 12/24/2024 10:51:38 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m thinking we should take a look for a second route....The Panama Canal isn’t perfect.


4 posted on 12/24/2024 10:53:35 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Greenland belongs to Denmark.


5 posted on 12/24/2024 10:54:00 AM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

That’s correct.


6 posted on 12/24/2024 11:03:35 AM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

We may not have much of a choice but to take the canal back.


7 posted on 12/24/2024 11:04:08 AM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Think like a negotiator!

Trump is pressuring Panama to close the Darian Gap by threatening to take back the Canal


8 posted on 12/24/2024 11:09:14 AM PST by MMusson ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

I heard someone say there’s a provision in the treaty regarding the Panama Canal, in which we can take back control under certain circumstances of an emergency.

I have not read the treaty myself. I just heard someone say that in the fine print of the treaty that this is possible.

I can see disagreements, however, if the government of Panama does not declare an emergency.

In the past did we have American military people in Panama? I recall in the past that the Panama Canal Zone was American territory, but I thought we gave that zone back as part of the canal treaty.


9 posted on 12/24/2024 11:09:31 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: No name given
What the canal needs.....is competition...

I bet Musk is pondering.

10 posted on 12/24/2024 11:09:54 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s gone. The US is not getting it back.

The best thing we could do is to have it shut down, so much more stuff would get made in the USA, which may be Trump’s intention.

Trump might actually be playing higher-dimensional chess.

An alternative is to suggest that the US might finance a second canal, unless the US Navy gets temporal transit preference and real cheap transit rates.


11 posted on 12/24/2024 11:12:31 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

12 posted on 12/24/2024 11:13:41 AM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Greenland belongs to Denmark.

but Greenland says it’s part of North America and screw the EU ,LOL


13 posted on 12/24/2024 11:14:02 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

I love the “Only 1 left. Order now.” LOL!


14 posted on 12/24/2024 11:14:49 AM PST by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Greenland is kind of a fun idea.”

I’m pretty sure some people in Copenhagen think otherwise.

Why should the US aggravate Denmark and Greenland simply to avoid operating a mine in the USA?

“Known for its natural beauty, the US state of Wyoming may soon be known for something buried beneath its stunning topography: An estimated 2.34 billion metric tons of rare earth minerals (REMs), which make the world’s computing-dependent technologies possible, were recently discovered near Wheatland, a town in southeastern Wyoming.

“According to American Rare Earths, the company’s wholly-owned deposits have a potential volume far greater than China’s estimated 44 million metric tons of the minerals, which could establish the US as the world’s largest supplier. At present, China supplies about 95% of the global supply of REMs, 74% of which are imported by the US.”

https://www.theearthandi.org/post/estimated-2-34-billion-metric-tons-of-rare-earth-minerals-discovered-in-us

Now if Greenland would like to sell mining rights, Congress might vote the funds to buy them, if a purchase can be made in the coming year.


15 posted on 12/24/2024 11:22:03 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: No name given

Naw....alternative route would probably be cheaper....and maybe give them immigrants jobs.


16 posted on 12/24/2024 11:26:57 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

P


17 posted on 12/24/2024 11:29:44 AM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When he says we’re going to reclaim the Panama Canal and annex Greenland, take it seriously. Trump is not to be underestimated.


18 posted on 12/24/2024 11:33:36 AM PST by Savage Beast (Fight! Fight! Fight! God Bless America! Trump won because good TRiUMPhed over evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

I read that Denmark is boosting their defense spending for Greenland after President Trump said he wanted it.


19 posted on 12/24/2024 11:55:22 AM PST by bravo whiskey (Annie Savoy : The world is made for people who aren't cursed with self awareness. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

America’s bankruptcy is far more of a threat, a fatal one, than Chinese companies operating in Panama.

But we won’t deal with the real problem, will we?


20 posted on 12/24/2024 11:56:28 AM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson