The Ayyadurai Debacle

The Post & Email Newspaper ^ | 23 Nov 2024 | Joseph DeMaio

[CDR Kerchner]

(Nov. 23, 2024) — Whooo boyyy… here we go again.

On Nov. 18, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its order denying the petition for certiorari in the case Shiva Ayyadurai v. New Jersey Democratic State Committee, (USSC Docket 24-342).

The case, – and Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’s claim that the “natural born Citizen” (“nbC”) presidential eligibility restriction in the Constitution…, is itself unconstitutional as being a denial of the equal protection of the laws under the 14th Amendment to naturalized U.S. citizens, as is Dr. Ayyadurai – was discussed back in 2023 here. Dr. Ayyarudai admitted that he is not an nbC, but based his claim on the fact that his naturalization should not render him ineligible to the presidency.

Before proceeding further here, interested P&E readers may want to first review that 2023 post to refresh the memory of how Dr. Ayyadurai’s claim relates to the nbC issue.

[CDR Kerchner]

An excellent analysis of Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai's challenge to the Presidential Eligibility Clause in our U.S. Constitution and the "natural born Citizen" term in the Presidential Eligibility Clause in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of our U.S. Constitution, which the U.S. Supreme Court continues to evade hearing and deciding the original intent meaning of that critically important national security term.

For that "natural born Citizen" term's original intent meaning, I state what it is in the following linked white paper report, and also clearly provide you the WHY the founders and framers chose that Natural Law term, “The Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How of the ‘natural born Citizen’ Term In Our United States Constitution”. Read the white paper by yours truly as a PDF file at this link: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf

[HYPOCRACY]

How does one rule the constitution is unconstitutional? This clown should be stripped of his citizenship if he doesn’t like our constitution.

[xkaydet65]

He appears to be claiming that XIV Amendment nullified the natural born clause the same way it and XIIIth nullified 3/5th clause. It is a very interesting idea.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

(From the article) : " ..U.S. Constitution, which the U.S. Supreme Court continues to evade hearing and deciding the original intent
meaning of that critically important national security term."

The original intent in the Constitution was to eliminate any foreign power, or personal foreign interest, in the operations of the U.S. government
Hence, the elimination of anyone of foreign birth.
If you don't like it, join the Founding Fathers and argue with them, as they are reasonable,
whereas you are discontent with their fundamental decision.

[AZJeep]

XIV Amendment has been used (abused) to justify all kind of rulings, which were never intended by the XIV Amendment authors.

[HYPOCRACY]

Thanks for the summation.

[Liz]

Tilted Irish Kilt posted: the original intent was to eliminate any foreign power, or personal foreign interest, in the operations of the U.S. government. Hence, the elimination of anyone of foreign birth.

Too bad whiner Ayyadurai doesn’t like it. He’s nothing but a sniveling
bellyaching discontent who should go back to where he came from.

[rx]

his naturalization should not render him ineligible to the presidency

The presidential requirement vis-à-vis being a natural born citizen has nothing to do with any protection.

The US Constitution provides for a procedure to allow it to be changed. Let the doctor fully engage therein if he wants to see such change.

Hopefully only a insufficiently-schooled, ineligible foreigner would have the temerity to claim, as he does, that the very text of the Constitution is "unconstitutional." PTUI!

[CDR Kerchner]

You obviously did not read the full article by Joseph DeMaio about the Dr. Shiva challenge to the presidential eligibility clause or my White Paper about the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” of the United States, nor are you discerning who said what: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf

[elpadre]

Wasn’t it the original intent of the 14th Amendment to give freed slaves full citizenship and nothing more????

[fella]

I knew that sooner or later the Democrats would find a way to declare the Constitution to be Unconstitutional

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

You are correct in that i did not read your article by Joseph DeMaio about the Dr. Shiva challenge to the presidential eligibility clause
or my White Paper about the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” of the United States, .. "

When I went to Sharon Rondeau's "The Post and Email" website, I took greater interest and delight in :
"The House of Representatives Passes Tydings "Past" Act to Protect (Tennessee) Walking Horses ".
As I found that article more interesting than self- aggrandizement and intellectual 'nit picking' about presidential eligibility.
We have already suffered through one occasion with a foreign born 'Manchurian Candidate' for President whose birth was creatively fabricated in the Democratic State of Hawaii,
and we don't need another one !
As a matter of fact, his third term resulted in defeat as most Americans opposed his Marxist style of Facism recently.
The Constitutional rule is there for a purpose - to prevent any foreign influence or power to interfere with the operation of our government.
Well, we won't let that FUBAR happen again !
and, in fact, the rule of Constitutional Law still stands today.

[CDR Kerchner]

And the “Manchurian Candidate” dreamed of having a “fourth term” and in pulling the puppet strings of his front-person from behind the curtain. See: https://rumble.com/v5i5g8d-obamas-ideal-fourth-term.html