Posted on 11/12/2024 3:51:30 AM PST by MtnClimber
The word 'preposterous' seems like it was created to describe Kamala Harris. Her run in the 2020 Democrat primary was preposterous. Being chosen as Biden's running mate was preposterous. Her tenure as VP with the relentless word salads and the consistent incompetence was preposterous. Her becoming the nominee of the Democrat party despite not having a single primary vote was preposterous. Her campaign for the presidency was preposterous.
You may have assumed that the end of her ill-fated campaign would be the end of this absurdity, but you are wrong.
Yesterday on one of CNN's Sunday Morning news shows, a Democrat contributor, Jamal Simmons, said that she still has a path to the presidency. For a change, the man wasn't talking about an effort to subvert the historic mandate received by President Trump last week.
SNIP
Instead, Simmons was looking to Joe Biden, whom he called a phenomenal President, to fulfill his promise of being 'a transitional figure.' Simmons was the Communication Director for Vice President Kamala Harris from January 2022 to January 5, 2023. So he does hold some responsibility for the word salads. Simmons suggested that Biden still has a chance to create history and lead the way to the first female president of color.
How did he propose this be done?
He suggested that Biden resign
He said it would also prevent Kamala from suffering the ignominy of certifying an election where she suffered a humiliating defeat. The idea was so ridiculous that members of the echo chamber i.e. co-panelists and the host of the segment broke into titters.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I could see Joe doing this.
Dr. Jill enters the chat and blurts, No way Jose!
I think Joe will go for the best outcome for himself and his family. Tomorrow he meets with Trump and I think he’ll be sniffing out a pardon deal for himself and Hunter.
Broke into “titters”?! What’s a “titter”?
Biden would rather see her dead.
What possible reason would Joe do this? His party stabbed him in the back. He still feels he would have won.
Trump may offer a pardon for him not Hunter if he does not resign, after all Mondale in 1981, Gore in 2001, and Quayle in a VP case in 1993 presided over their defeats. But Kami cant?
More proof she’s incapable of doing anything on her own but a perfect example of the lefts lunacy. Merit is the last thing they think of.
Harris could refuse to preside, in which case the President Pro-Tempore would preside , which would be Grassley
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
tit·ter
verb
3rd person present: titters
give a short, half-suppressed laugh; giggle.
Democrats obsessed with “identity” votes triggered Harris’ pronounced anti-male attitude:
<><>and her perverse “diversity, equity and inclusion”
<><>inclusion not diverse enough to include men, especially White males.
<><>simply put, all-out discrimination against men.
Democrats’ bellowed about “Believe Women,” “#MeToo,” “toxic masculinity,”
“the patriarchy,” “male privilege/power” and crowed about “the future is female.”
Dems would create “safe spaces” and “trigger warnings” for women......
but not for men.......implying men were predators of “defenseless” women.
“Dr. Jill enters the chat and blurts, No way Jose!”
^this
Stiletto Jill spiked this already.
These idiots really think Joe Biden will do anything for the drunken coke whore who blame his son for her whitehouse cocaine and pushed Joe (and Jill) off the ticket with a 25th amendment threat.
lol
“I think he’ll be sniffing out a pardon deal for himself and Hunter.”
An interesting thought. Joe is nothing if not pragmatic. It’s unlikely Trump will use the DOJ to go after him as the optics would look terrible. Trump is a master of optics. So what does Joe have to trade that Trump values enough to do this? Joe can and I expect will pardon his son. Joe doesn’t give two (insert word here) about what people think or how he looks to the faithful.
it is a magazine seen in a movie as military contraband. “band of brothers” I think.
Good, we need to eliminate the first women president reason for voting.
How does this benefit the nation? It makes a joke of the Office. Oh, we don’t want to see her preside over a certification of an election that she lost. Who cares? When are these people ever going to propose anything for the good of the country?
Making a joke of the country is their goal. They hate the USA especially since a majority voted for Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.