Posted on 10/31/2024 5:56:23 AM PDT by Dr. Marten
In a recent broadcast, Fox News 45 Baltimore brought Dr. Paul Marik, a physician and outspoken figure in alternative cancer therapies, to discuss an alarming spike in aggressive cancer cases among young adults—what he terms “turbo cancer.”
This trend, Dr. Marik claims, is on the rise in the United States, the UK, and Japan, particularly affecting individuals aged 14 to 44. Dr. Marik, a co-founder and chief scientific officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, suggested that a potential link exists between COVID-19 vaccinations—especially booster shots—and these unusually aggressive cancer cases.
With a description as unsettling as it sounds, “turbo cancer” refers to advanced and aggressive cancers occurring at unprecedented rates among younger people, Dr. Marik explained. While cancer has typically been more common in older populations, he noted that physicians are now seeing a significant shift: not only is cancer striking younger individuals, but cases are often diagnosed at later stages and progress more rapidly than before.
“We’re seeing an explosion of cases among young people, with cancers presenting as advanced stage three or four,” Dr. Marik emphasized. “The rapid increase in cases of aggressive cancers within the age range of 14 to 44 has been deeply concerning.”
One of the more controversial aspects of Dr. Marik’s interview was his assertion of a potential association between COVID-19 vaccines and turbo cancer, particularly the booster doses. This angle has sparked fierce debate, as the correlation between vaccines and cancer remains highly contested and complex, requiring extensive research to substantiate such claims. Dr. Marik expressed concern over what he perceives as a possible shift in cancer characteristics following vaccination campaigns.
His statements have already led to heightened discussions across social media and online forums, with both support and criticism pouring in from viewers and the medical community alike.
Dr. Marik’s interview also delved into the controversy surrounding his book on cancer treatment strategies. Initially banned by Amazon for what they deemed misleading information, the book has since been reinstated on the platform. Marik attributes its reinstatement to the robust clinical references supporting the recommendations, as the publication contains over 1,500 peer-reviewed citations.
Marik’s book emphasizes a combination of lifestyle changes, such as adopting a low-glycemic or ketogenic diet, avoiding highly processed foods, and reducing sugar intake to prevent cancer growth. He also advocates for the importance of vitamin D, which he claims has a scientifically supported role in reducing cancer risk.
Beyond traditional treatments, Dr. Marik encourages lifestyle and dietary modifications as part of cancer prevention. He advocates for reducing glucose intake and avoiding processed foods, explaining that these dietary changes are foundational in preventing metabolic disorders and insulin resistance, which are linked to cancer growth. For those already facing cancer, Marik’s treatment list includes repurposed drugs such as vitamin D, beta-blockers, melatonin, metformin, curcumin, and even ivermectin, arguing that clinical literature supports these alternative therapies.
“These suggestions aren’t just made up,” he remarked, asserting that they are grounded in high-quality, peer-reviewed scientific research.
Dr. Marik’s comments have added fuel to the ongoing debate about the COVID-19 vaccine’s long-term health implications, with “turbo cancer” becoming a viral topic across media platforms. His assertions have drawn interest from individuals wary of mainstream health protocols, while others in the scientific community caution against drawing conclusions without comprehensive evidence.
For those interested in learning more, the FLCCC Alliance provides resources aimed at educating the public on Marik’s approaches to cancer care. Dr. Marik’s statements, however polarizing, have spurred a new round of discussions on the potential implications of COVID-19 vaccines and the urgent need for research into the shifting cancer landscape.
Ant be true. The trump vax is safe and effective. He said so.
“Vaccine used to be defined as a substances that provides ‘immunity’ to a specific disease,” reads the text of an Instagram post shared Nov. 4. “Now, Merriam Webster has literally changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ and removed the ‘immunity’ portion in order to possibly cover for the fact that the COVID ‘vaccines’ don’t actually provide immunity from COVID.”
What’s interesting is the line “particularly the booster doses”. I wonder what is different about the boosters vs the original shot.
what the hell did they expect when they injected everyone with genetic instructions to hijack every ribosome in every cell in the human body to churn out highly toxic covid spike proteins, with zero knowledge regarding how many highly toxic covid spike proteins would be produced and for how long and how the organs and systems of the body would react to said highly toxic covid spike proteins?
utter insanity ... i cry for the millions who were damaged by ignorantly trusting the medical “authorities” and government authorities who promised that said genetic injections were “safe and effective” ...
Now we have “Turbo” cancer. I sure hope my Dodge truck with its wonderful Cummins engine doesn’t get sick and die on me.
Brought to the uninformed by the Medical-Industrial Complex, “Shut up and take your vaccine.”
A lot of us also were under tremendous pressure to take the vax - either from family members (my friend was not allowed to see her grandkids unless she was vaxxed, I was not allowed in my daughter’s home). That same daughter, fully vaxxed (I think on shot #four or five) has had Covid three times, her husband twice. For others, it was mandated by their workplace.
I took the vax and boosters - and believe it was a huge mistake, I’ll never take another vax as long as I live, even if it means I cannot visit certainly family members.
My athletic sister-in-law suffered a brain injury after the 3rd vax - she crashed her car in the parking lot of the clinic as she was leaving and has never recovered, her scans show terminal cerebral atrophy, she can no longer walk, is in a motorized wheelchair, can no longer speak and her hands and feet are curling inward. Neurologists told my brother two years. Unfortunately, she is about to go into assisted living and will most likely remain there. My brother is really broken up about it and fully believes it was the 3rd booster that did it.
The V.A. is STILL trying to get me to take the kung-flu jab and Flu shot.
I don’t trust ANY shot coming from there anymore.
My wife’s daughter, a registered nurse quit speaking to her mother once she found out that we made our mutual, private decision not to take the Covid shots. It has been over 3 years and during that time, both of my wife’s parents have passed with no words of sympathy from the daughter at all.
I feel so bad for my wife.
MFO
DUH !!!!!!!!!
Each of the poison death shots causes damage, sometimes people don't get their N + 1 shot because their number N was enough.
I know a person with an N = 4 that:
1. Went to the ER for chest pains like someone was stabbing her in the heart
2. Went to the ER for GI pain where morphine was given the pain was so bad
3. Now wears a hearing aid as the hearing is so bad that conversations are difficult without it (60 years old)
This person would be in the front of the line to get another booster because deep thinking is not one of her strengths.
Some of us believe that Dr. Bill Gates has depopulation goals and vaxxxxxines are the way to meet those goals. Imagine the death toll numbers we'd have if the poison death shot had been administered every six months.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.