[xoxox]

it’s a thin line between “plagiarism” and merely cutting-and-pasting the talking points one’s handlers have prescribed.

or is it?

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Oh wow. This is a huge issue because it destroys her credibility AND every entity or person trying to defend her who touches it.

[RayChuang88]

Remember, Kamala Harris was California Attorney General from 2011 to 2017. This was right in the middle of when Sean "Diddy" Combs was having his very illicit "freak out" parties, many of which were held in his mansions in California. If Harris was using her time as AG to "protect" Diddy, that could very quickly end the Harris campaign because she could be brought up on obstruction of justice charges at minimum.

[packagingguy]

This type of behavior buried politicians…40 years ago.

Not sure if it will have any impact today.

[stanne]

Disaster?!

People still don’t get the double standard. That’s amazing

[Pearls Before Swine]

Plagiarism is stealing, bad.

Self-plagiarism...re-copying old stuff... not so bad IMO.

[ClearCase_guy]

I do believe in Free Speech.

But I don’t think it’s OK that 99% of Major Media is primarily in the business of helping the Democrats and hurting the Republicans. That’s not what the First Amendment is for.

I’d like the FCC to start stomping on media that is blatantly biased. Of course, that is somewhat subjective. But for decades, there have been “mistakes” in media coverage, and for decades, 100% of the “mistakes” have benefited the Democrats.

I’d like the FCC to try and be fair, but it they make any “mistakes” and some of those “mistakes” seem unfair and punitive to the Democrats, then [shrug] that’s just how it goes.

But businesses like the NYT, CNN, and MSNBC should probably be driven into bankruptcy.

[Tommy Revolts]

“It is a very sensitive topic”. D’oh.

[Drawsing]

Just went to the Amazon listing for this book and another one supposedly written by Harris “The Truths We Hold”. Amazon always starts it’s review section with an AI summary of all the reviews. This summary usually starts out with the positive and adds a little negative at the end. Both of these books summaries are all positive...even though I saw a few individual negative reviews.

[newfreep]

Kamala Harris Announces All-New Original Book: 'The Art Of The Deal'

"The Bee"

[nopardons]

BTTT

[Ann Archy]

I’d bet $1000.00 that she DID NOT WRITE ANY PART OF THIS BOOK!

[cgbg]

Publisher quote in article:

“This is a very sensitive topic.”

Lol.

They got caught with their fingers in the cookie jar.

[Billthedrill]

And the NYT "expert" who said it was no big deal turns out to have been presented with a very limited fraction of the actual evidence. This reflects more poorly on the NYT than it does the actual perpetrator - what was it they were self-righteously bleating during Watergate, "the coverup is worse than the crime"?

It's open theft, a scheme to divert unearned money to an undeserving recipient. Whether she actually did it (I question if she's smart enough to do even that), she signed her name to it and if Kammy takes a dime, she's guilty.