Posted on 09/21/2024 4:18:29 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Prior to their respective assassination attempts targeting Trump, Ryan Routh and Thomas Crooks had extraordinary proximity to U.S. Intelligence, demonstrated foreknowledge of Trump’s schedule and security, and acquired skills that intelligence agencies have a history of sharing with assets.
Routh and Crooks had forehand knowledge of security, other federal intelligence
Routh staked out Trump’s golf club for twelve hours, lying in wait behind bushes to ambush him during an unscheduled game of golf. Unfamiliar with the locale, Routh managed to give security the slip, bringing an AK-47-style rifle onto Trump’s golf course. Routh managed to give a U.S. Secret Service agent the slip again after being fired upon, losing his pursuer despite initially being only ten feet away from the agent (whose gunfire somehow missed Routh), escaping in his vehicle only to be caught later thanks to a witness who snapped a picture of his license plate. For the second time, it was not the Secret Service, but locals who caught the gunman.
Crooks’s plan also suggests that he was tipped off, specifically regarding the AGR building he would make his sniper nest. Cell phone data put Crooks near the Butler fairgrounds on July 7 for 20 minutes — likely recon on AGR. Crooks scoped out AGR for 70 minutes on July 13 at 11 A.M. He went home to buy a ladder and ammunition and to retrieve his gun. Crooks returned at 3:45 to the AGR building, carrying the ladder receipt in his pocket but lacking the ladder. Crooks clearly planned to scale the roof with the ladder, but the fact that he left it suggests that he had learned the local snipers’ positions at AGR and would have no trouble secretly scaling the roof using an unguarded roof access point.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Many people including US Congressmen are urging Trump to supplement his detail with former special forces guys. I’ve said it for months. I do not understand why he isn’t doing it.
One video isn't a Block Rock commerical. Both videos have a War in Ukraine connection, one direct and one indirect.
People in the Trump Campaign and his inner circle were the ones who picked Butler as a venue, where an assassin with a rifle would have a direct shot at Trump and they also picked the golf course
The biggest danger to any organization is being infiltrated thus every effort must be made to check everyone to make sure this is not the case.
In times like these, it’s best to trust no one.
Scheduled on the same day were Kamala and I think Jill Biden events. Trump’s regular SS detail were pulled off to cover those events and Trump got the D-team from DHS that had a zoom training call for training. Was that a coincidence that this happened and CNN showed up out of the blue with closeups of Trump’s head during the one time they covered a 2024 rally?
I wonder who in the Trump Campaign did the scheduling?
The Butler PA event was supposed to be at the airport, but a car show (I think) had been scheduled so the event had to be moved. Anyone would know Trump would have several events in Pa since it is such an important swing state.
If someone wanted to facilitate Trump’s assassination, how could they go about it?
Perhaps use the FBI to identify and target certain disaffected individuals and help them in innocuous ways, like a simple “hands off” approach and monitoring. If you wanted to further the grooming, could other efforts like the CIA’s former MKUltra Program be of use? Then as opportunities close, offer schedule information, details on protection regimes and so on? Enlist elements of the MSM to help obscure actual events and time lines......
Well... you stop far too late.
Let's also notice that the only two non-Democrats elected president between John Adams in 1796 and assassinated Abraham Lincoln (elected in 1860), both non-Democrats died in office under suspicious circumstances:
In summary, since 1800:
You are stuck on that "Democrat" thing. As I have told you repeatedly, a more accurate way of seeing it is to view people as "Hamiltonians" versus "Jeffersonians."
The Hamiltonians wanted big government, government policy set by what is favorable to the enrichment of industry and corporations, massive government spending, and government poking it's nose into things way beyond the scope of just defending the nation and administering domestic laws.
The Jeffersonians view of government was "laissez faire."
The more I have come to understand that Alexander Hamilton's view of government inevitably leads to collusion between government and industry, (Fascism) the more I think it was a tragedy that he didn't get shot sooner.
Much of our troubles with our government are built on the foundation of Hamilton's view of the role of government.
And yes, I am aware the problem goes back before 1850, but my intent was to just get you to recognize it goes back at least to 1850.
Jefferson's Gallatin Plan for infrastructure:
All that is 100% nonsense, just Democrat propaganda, used in the 1790s to defeat Federalist John Adams in the 1800 presidential election.
Jefferson's propaganda worked, but Jeffersonian Democrats then did not reduce the size and scope of Federal government in any way -- instead, they expanded it into ever more non-constitutional purviews.
Those included:
So, it was all lies.
DiogenesLamp: "The more I have come to understand that Alexander Hamilton's view of government inevitably leads to collusion between government and industry, (Fascism) the more I think it was a tragedy that he didn't get shot sooner."
And there it is! The Democrat mind-set on full display -- if we can't defeat them with lies, if we can't jail them with false arrests, then let's just shoot whatever SOBs stand in our way. Yeah, that's the ticket... </sarcasm>
Seriously, FRiend, your brain is fried with Democrat group-think, and it's so deep inside that you can't even see it.
Do you wonder why non-Democrats have historically been such targets of assassination?
DiogenesLamp: "And yes, I am aware the problem goes back before 1850, but my intent was to just get you to recognize it goes back at least to 1850."
Nooooo.... the problem you see goes all the way back to the anti-Federalists of 1788, who voted against ratifying George Washington's new Constitution, and soon after became Jeffersonian Democratic-Republicans.
At the time they were called "Democratics" because of Jefferson's admiration for the "Democratic" French Revolution's guillotine and the "blood of tyrants".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.