Posted on 07/22/2024 9:33:51 AM PDT by CDR Kerchner
(Jul. 22, 2024) — Trump will have the legal standing in federal courts to do so if she is nominated for that office by the DNC. And Trump should do so to force SCOTUS to take up the issue of the “natural born Citizen” term as it applies to whom can constitutionally serve as the President and Commander in Chief (and VP per the 12th Amendment) and resolve it. The courts evaded the issue using “lack of standing by the plaintiffs” for Obama and then also for Harris for VP. They should not do that again. Former Chief Justice Marshall‘s words from the past tell them they should not evade the issue.
To Kamala Harris: Fool the voting electorate once, shame on you. Fool the voting electorate twice, shame on us. She owes allegiance since birth to the English monarch – formerly Queen Elizabeth and now King Charles! Click on the image below for more details.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
I really wish people would stop bring this issue up. It distracts from the real policy issues and looks to the average voter as petty.
Case law has long established that a person born in the US is a US citizen, expect for children born to foreign diplomats and a few other exceptions.
If we push this to the Supreme Court we will come off as stupid and petty as if we can't just win without resorting to lawfare.
And let's be honest, does any rational thinking person believe that the Supreme Court would invalidate a candidate or a sitting president as ineligible. She the damn VP for Gods sake.
They would simply pass or laugh counsel out of court.
People need to stop smoking that Mexican ditch weed and lets deliver the left a righteous stomp fest on election day.
This nonsense has nothing to do with the Law, which is well-established. It is a result of a mental defect among the people who keep bringing it up. They live in a Fantasy world, like sovereign citizens who have discovered they do not need a driver’s license, or the trannies who think if they put on a dress they become real women.
It is a relatively mild form of insanity for the Birthers, not much different from the Flat Earthers. But it is still insanity.
Yes the Roberts Supreme Court has been evading the issue of “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Justice Thomas stated that before a subcommittee of Congress: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu6OiTiua08
Our nation’s government is being overrun with foreign influencers.
The Founders and Framers would be horrified at what is transpiring in our country.
Kamala Harris Owes Homage and Allegiance to the King of Jamaica – King Charles III: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2022/09/09/kamala-harris-owes-homage-and-allegiance-to-the-king-of-jamaica-king-charles-iii/
The NBC knitting circle meets every four years to exchange thoughts on parentage, kings, queens, etc.
Not exchanged, because it does not exist and isn’t going to happen this cycle either: A court ruling barring a U.S.-born person from a POTUS ballot.
NBC = No Body Cares
Correct.
And yet here you are, taking time out from your busy day to make known your objections regarding an issue you consider silly.
You should also maybe cut back on drinking and dope-smoking or whatever sort of self-medication you are doing.
Again, such well reasoned arguments. How can anyone doubt your position is the correct one?
No. There’s NOTHING there.
Credit for a new conspiracy theory on the fly. Canada? Seriously?
If she was born in the U.S, were her parents in the U.S. legally?
PLEASE-—IT IS EVERYTHING.
KAMALA is an anchor baby-—
Nothing more
We have MILLIONS OF THOSE.
I would think a naturalization process at birth would also not qualify.
Under the 14th Amendment's Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship.
Well this is incorrect. In the Wong Kim Ark case, the Supreme court went out of its way to *NOT* say Ark was "natural born". It said he was a "citizen." It did *NOT* say "natural born citizen", and if you read their argument on the case, they make it clear he is a "citizen" by the operation of the 14th amendment.
And since we've mentioned the 14th amendment, I will inform you, because nobody else will, that the 14th amendment is a naturalization process.
And you don't have to take my word for it. You can read the congressional debates on the 14th amendment, and the men who passed it through congress will tell you that it is a "naturalization". They repeatedly refer to it being a process for "naturalizing" the freed slaves, who everyone will admit at the time were not citizens.
The 14th amendment naturalizes people at birth. It is not at all the same thing as someone who is a "natural born" citizen.
IT NEVER WAS CHANGE.
IT WAS IGNORED BY HOWARD DEAN & PELOSI WHEN THEY WANTED OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
BOTH SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH TREASON.
There is not the slightest benefit to be had from doing this.
The Democrat-Media-Complex will just turn it into endless accusations of "racism."
It will distract from every other important point Trump tries to make in his campaign.
This topic is poison and Trump should stay away from it.
OBAMA’s BIRTH CERT was a total fake.
THE MOST GLARING ERROR:
THE HOSPITAL NAMED ON THE “CERTIFICATE” was a HOSPITAL FORMED BY THE MERGER OF 2 OTHER HOSPITALS.
THAT MERGER OCCURRED 5-6 YEARS AFTER BARRY WAS BORN..
FAKE CERTIFICATE.
It's a fools wet dream and will never happen, nor should it ever be.
Let the election results fall as they may with Trump winning in 2024.
BOTH MATTER
TRUMP’S ONLY OFFSPRING THAT IS NBC IS TIFFANY
TRUMP’S ONLY OFFSPRING THAT IS NBC IS TIFFANY
SHE WAS NOT.
TRUMP’s ONLY OFFSPRING THAT IS NBC IS TIFFANY
Case law has long established that a person born in the US is a US citizen, expect for children born to foreign diplomats and a few other exceptions.
If we push this to the Supreme Court we will come off as stupid and petty as if we can't just win without resorting to lawfare.
And let's be honest, does any rational thinking person believe that the Supreme Court would invalidate a candidate or a sitting president as ineligible. She the damn VP for Gods sake.
They would simply pass or laugh counsel out of court.
All of this is correct. It is not politically beneficial to us, and we should not do it.
However, this is a very different matter from declaring the dominant position to be "truth."
It is not "truth", and there is a lot of evidence to prove that the common wisdom position is in fact wrong. Factually wrong. As in "not true."
I agree with your argument that it is not politically beneficial to us, but I disagree that the topic should be dropped and that we should all just accept what everyone tells us to believe, even if it is wrong.
But we should keep these disagreements to ourselves, and we should not be inducing anyone to take up these arguments in public or in court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.