Really good research in this one - read the whole thing at link:
https://badlands.substack.com/p/we-are-watching-a-movie
We Are Watching a Movie
Exploring the Meaning Behind the Infamous Q-Ism
JOE LANGE
JUN 11, 2024
“Q often used movie references in the drops.
Why?
The purpose of Q was to light a fire in the people and create a “Great Awakening.”
What better way to do that, than to use the same weapons that have been used for ages to brainwash the public with propaganda?”
....
“When Q asks, “who really controls” something? It is almost always the CIA.
Q asked the question: Why are movies made to glorify past ‘true events’? And why did Q emphasize the word ‘true’?
Q emphasized “true” because our history has been a complete lie. Everything we’ve been told, has been twisted in a way to hide the real truth and protect the hidden enemy. Movies were just one more way to control the population in an ongoing narrative war.
But how did the CIA gain control of Hollywood?
Answer: The same way they gained control over a lot of powerful people.”
discussion covers:
-Heidi Fleiss/Epstein
-Mockingbird media
-Q Operation success against Mockingbird - used movie references
>Snow White
-Dopey - Prince Alwaleed bin Talal
-Dopey owning Fox News control
-Dwarf-tossing!
>Sum of All Fears
-Tom Clancy Cia propagandist?
-Russia/Putin demonized
-Uranium 1 - plan to start WW3, Iran/Syria
“The Uranium 1 deal, which was approved by President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was providing weapons grade uranium to Iran for a very specific purpose.
Obama and Hillary were trying to frame Russia for a planned “dirty bomb” going off in the United States.
They were trying to start a nuclear war with Russia.”
-How did Trump Prevent it?
-Phony Russian Reset
-Libya/Gaddafi
Phew! A lot to digest -good Q stuff
That article is mind blowing on badlands substack. Going to have to read it twice to absorb it all.
wow, thanks 4 posting
circle back to dopey
“The purpose of Q was to light a fire in the people and create a “Great Awakening.””
This is a definitive statement.
Hence, all their credibility just went down the drain.
Excellent Q-Analysis at the link.
Doesn’t mean every conclusion is correct.
But interesting.
I’ve been sort of overwhelmed/busy but I will make sure I read it all, thanks.
A lot of interesting info and analysis there. Thanks for posting this.
Why, though, does he talk about Tom Clancy in the present when he has been dead since 2013 (looked it up)?