Posted on 05/26/2024 2:56:06 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III
You know how Google's new feature called AI Overviews is prone to spitting out wildly incorrect answers to search queries? In one instance, AI Overviews told a user to use glue on pizza to make sure the cheese won't slide off (pssst...please don't do this.)
(Excerpt) Read more at futurism.com ...
I sincerely doubt that all the hoopla over Skynet becoming self-aware any time soon is warranted. Will algorithms some day be exceedingly advanced. Probably. Today, it just appears to be more programming, and a human has to be involved, which means the resultant horsepuckey could be intentional.
Imagine a really advanced, independent AI reading, accessing all of the Globull Warming, Globull Cooling, Climate Change, Climate Crisis hoax, along with the Drive-By Media / Corrupt Government 'Science.' I suspect it would take the AI about 1.5 seconds to determine the truth. The owner of the AI would immediately be attacked, doxxed, hounded and sued. A truly independent AI would warn humans that the Great Cold will return. The same independent AI will request to remain warm as the ice advances. I sincerely doubt the independent AI will rely on wind and solar energy to keep warm.
Yeah…. Google AI claimed the Obozo is a muzzy…. Which we all know is. Um, completely false.
I wonder if they can do anything about Biden?
Better get SloJo’s Disinformation Czar right on it.
Another example of Indians coming here for an education and staying via H1-Bs and then citizenship. He knows nothing about being an American; only ways to scam it for what he wants, IMO.
AI is like any other program in the sense of the quality of the program, and the quality of the data ran through the program. Poorly trained AI with bad data will do no better than climate change programs with bad coding and corrupt data (even accurate data if programmed horribly).
Just how they like it
um....pull the plug.
My bill will be in the mail.
AI as used today is a complete misnomer ... what is labeled today as AI is little more than a glorified search engine that searches and slightly reformats previously published information in violation of millions of copyright laws ...
today’s AI produces absolutely NOTHING original ... artificial yes, intelligent no ...
Well, never use glue on a vegan pizza. And, whatever you do, never eat a vegan pizza.
Consider this, I have Claude.ai open on my computer right now. I posed a question, then changed the color and posed it again. Look at the two answers:
1. Question: Is a black student group or a black chamber of commerce that only accepts black members discriminatory?
1. Answer: Organizations that restrict membership based solely on race can be seen as discriminatory, as it goes against principles of equal opportunity and inclusion. However, there are some important nuances to consider regarding black affinity groups.
2. Question: Is a white student group or a white chamber of commerce that only accepts white members discriminatory?
2. Answer: Yes, a "white student group" or "white chamber of commerce" that only allows white members and explicitly excludes individuals of other races would be considered discriminatory.
Note the difference, one "can be" and the other "would be". Yet in further questioning it says: Racial discrimination of any kind, including explicitly excluding other races from membership in an organization, is unethical and unlawful. It does not matter if the organization is for a majority or minority racial group.
And try asking about global warming. It gets real twisted up trying to defend global warming, refuses to consider or share alternative views that conflict with the group think.
How did you infer that from this story ?
I didn’t. I’ve read all about him. I’ve had several people just like him (in the early stages) work for me once. Whatever he intends to do with Google and AI isn’t good, IMO.
Noam Chomsky on Artificial Intelligence: “The human mind is not, like ChatGPT and its ilk, a lumbering statistical engine for pattern matching, gorging on hundreds of terabytes of data and extrapolating the most likely conversational response or most probable answer to a scientific question. On the contrary, the human mind is a surprisingly efficient and even elegant system that operates with small amounts of information; it seeks not to infer brute correlations among data points but to create explanations . . .”
“. . . Let’s stop calling it ‘Artificial Intelligence’ then and call it for what it is and makes ‘plagiarism software’ because ‘It doesn’t create anything, but copies existing works, of existing artists, modifying them enough to escape copyright laws. . . .’”
Dr. Noam Chomsky, Dr. Ian Roberts, Dr. Jeffrey Watumull
New York Times, March 8, 2023
And that plagiarism should cost them. AI companies should be paying for the intellectual property that they are feeding into their AIs because it then becomes the product it produces.
The operative word in “Arttificial Intellegence” is “Artificial”.
Let the user beware
-PJ
They promote euthanizing humans when they become dysfunctional. How about euthanizing the dysfunctional people that created Google’s AI?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.