[Red Badger]

First there were not enough, now there are too many?.................

[Magnum44]

I think they prefer to be called "galaxies of short stature"...

[hinckley buzzard]

Advancing research into the cosmos is generating an increasing number of “problems” for standard theory. Gravity seems to work differently with mega galaxy clusters, dark matter still a mystery, now this; As Thomas Kuhn demonstrated years ago, when anomalies mount up, the time becomes ripe for a scientific revolution.

[Carl Vehse]

"Apparent overabundance means theories of how galaxies took shape in the early universe may need adjusting" more funding for astronomers and new telescopes built and launched into space so astronomers can develop new theories which, when determined to be flawed, will create the need for more increased funding for astronomers and telescopes, and so on and so on...

[adorno]

Once you create a theory, and talk about it often enough, it becomes real and everything else will stem from that theory.

Dark matter is still theoretical, but, explanations for everything that occurs or is observed in the universe. has become dependent on something that is still not proven to exist. It’s like all strange things that have no explanation in the world can be explained by the existence of ‘ghosts’.

[Adder]

not just a sufficient number of satellite galaxies to satisfy the simulations—but too many.

They are going to call the area Munchkinland

[Seruzawa]

Here we go again. Pseudoscience.