Bumble ad campaign gets backlash for ‘shaming women’ who aren’t having sex

The dating app Bumble issued an apology this week for its recent advertisements that appeared to insult the idea of women choosing not to have sex or date. The company was criticized as being disrespectful of women.

According to the BBC, Bumble’s new ad campaign (targeted towards women) included taglines such as, “A vow of celibacy is not the answer” and “Thou shalt not give up on dating and become a nun.” Bumble said the ads were supposed to be funny amidst the frustrations of modern dating, but many people did not find them to be humorous.

Fast Company reported that the “backlash was swift” and social media users accused Bumble of using language that “invalidated women’s sexual autonomy, the experiences of asexual people, and restrictions on reproductive rights.”

One Instagram user wrote, “Why doesn’t your next campaign focus on men changing their bad behavior instead of telling women to lower their standards and boundaries?”

Another commented on X, “Wild to me that in 2024, a dating app founded by a woman is shaming women.”

Another wrote, “Hey women! Have you thought about lowering your standards? To the gutter?”

And one woman suggested, “What if the billboard gave men tips on how to be less awful?”

Bumble issued an apology stating, “We made a mistake. Our ads referencing celibacy were an attempt to lean into a community frustrated by modern dating, and instead of bringing joy and humor, we unintentionally did the opposite.”

It continued, “Some of the perspectives we heard were: from those who shared that celibacy is the only answer when reproductive rights are continuously restricted; from others for who [sic] celibacy is a choice, one that we respect…”

Live Action recently launched a new groundbreaking series called “The Truth About Sex” with its first video: “The Sexual Revolution of the Roman Empire.”

In the video, Live Action founder and president Lila Rose juxtaposes the poor sexual ethics present during the Roman empire with the sexual ethics that were formed when the first Christians initiated a sort of ‘sexual revolution’ that changed the world.

As previously explained by Live Action News, the video highlights the lack of sexual morality that existed during the Roman Empire, noting that social status often dictated what was permitted sexually. A free man of high status could, for example, engage in sex with anyone he chose from a lower class. Slaves and children were often treated as sexual objects to the men who wanted to abuse them. Abortion and infanticide were also practiced.

When Christianity entered the picture, it introduced the teaching that all human beings are made in the image and likeness of God, and it normalized a freely chosen monogamous relationship between one man and one woman. A monogamous marriage, explained Rose, became “the only acceptable context for any sexual activity” among Christians. Christianity ushered in a counter-cultural sexual revolution of fidelity and respect within the Roman Empire. People were no longer to be viewed as sexual objects or babies as problems to be eliminated.

“Far from imposing an oppressive patriarchy, Christian sexual ethics elevated virtually everyone in society,” Rose explains. “The value of slaves, women, and children were no longer based on their social status, but on their status as children of God. Freely chosen, faithful marriage, not social status, became the measure for sexual morality.”

Christianity didn’t expect women to become as morally unethical regarding sex as men were. Instead, men were expected to correct their abusive behaviors. The sexual revolution of the 1960s and 70s, however, failed to hold men to a high standard and instead encouraged women to lower their standards.

Bumble’s ads are an example of this. Shaming women for not engaging in casual sex is a red flag that it’s time to consider a different kind of sexual ethic.

A concerning response to the Bumble ads is the idea that women are being forced into celibacy by pro-life laws. As Bumble stated, people commented that “celibacy is the only answer when reproductive rights are continuously restricted…” In other words, ‘if we can’t kill babies we won’t have sex at all.’ This is not a new sentiment. Ever since the reversal of Roe v. Wade, news outlets have published the grievances of those who say they will have to become more sexually responsible without the option to kill their preborn children without restrictions. Live Action created a satire video reflecting these sentiments:

This signifies that if killing children in the womb is prohibited, then young, unmarried women seem less willing to engage in casual sex. But in truth, it isn’t bad for people to take a different and emotionally (and physically) healthier approach to their relationships. Sex, which has the potential to create new human life, is never a casual act. It is too powerful for that. Reserving sex for marriage was part of the Christian sexual revolution of the 6th century and should be a part of a new, monogamous sexual revolution for modern times.

According to Rose, it was a combination of toxic ideologies that contributed to the breakdown of the Christian sexual ethics that stood for 2,000 years, including Marxism, second-wave feminism, and hedonistic post-relativism. While the sexual revolution of the 1960s and 70s promised equality for women by convincing them to take on the sexual behaviors of unethical men, it ultimately led to an increase in broken families and the legalization and widespread use of abortion.

It’s a serious problem if a person believes sex cannot take place without the option of killing the children created and that access to casual sex is more important than the lives of children. Much like the early Christians began rescuing babies who had been abandoned in the Roman empire, pro-life laws, policies, individuals, and organizations are working to save babies from being murdered by abortion in the name of the sexual ‘freedom’ of today’s society.

with “the best you can hope for” is a recipe for failure in life.

Hope is pretty much waiting and watching the universe go by. It takes effort to be successful.

with “the best you can hope for” is a recipe for failure in life.

drSteve78: Hope is pretty much waiting and watching the universe go by. It takes effort to be successful.

Please quote me in full - you have omitted an essential part of my statement:

To be satisfied only with "the best you can hope for" is a recipe for failure in life.

I don't understand if you are agreeing with me or not - or merely making a corollary statement and/or adding your own "take."

A "hope" that is not a realistic expectation will, in all likelihood, be doomed to disappointment.

You are free to hope for whatever you like, but to refuse, on principle, to be satisfied with anything less is a recipe for disappointment.

Regards,

Ouch!

Have you told her how miserable she is making you?

Close the wallet, put her on a budget. If she loves you, she will change her ways.

Totally agree with your full statement.

Could also be,
To complain about “ the best you can hope for” is a recipe for failure in life.

Or
Waiting for the phone to ring to bring “the best you can hope for” is a recipe for failure in life.

Yours is the best edit. ✍️

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.