Posted on 05/17/2024 5:25:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Video of meteorologist predicting severe Texas weather two days before it occurs and showing the Doppler beams ionizing the atmosphere. The Doppler radar towers put in a couple of decades ago have ten times the power going to them required for weather forecasting. The order of magnitude of power is for weather control.
Just before the 53 mark in this excellent interview, Nick Begich Jr explains the Hoover/FBI motive for killing Boggs and its context in history:
Everybody knows weather is controlled with 5G phones! /sarc
Godwin's Law (aka Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) rears its ugly head after only 20 posts.
I was living in Anchorage when that happened. I don’t recall hearing any conspiracy theories relating to it at the time. But after so many years, and now knowing what goes on being the scenes in government, I wouldn’t discount anything nefarious.
Per the wikipedia source, it was a journalist in Seattle in 2015 who first uncovered the FBI link.
“The internet is just another platform for the distribution of click-bait trash.”
Really?
I had no idea. Thanks.
I am too busy with my Shriner/Free Mason meetings to join Flat Earth. š
weather wars
Those who require watching a 20 minute vid with no transcript (which can save lots of time to obtain info) can expect readers to react to a mere headline.
“Iām thinking life is too short to waste it on somebody who doesnāt seem at all interested in learning whatās real.”
So you believe fracking causes major earthquakes!
“The other one is a video somebody else in the thread linked to which is a guy 9I see now that itās Dutchsinse) showing what heās found about how the government confirms that weather modification is real.”
Cloud seeding has been around for ages ...
” Iām thinking life is too short to waste it on somebody who doesnāt seem at all interested in learning whatās real.”
I learned that radar waves were non-ionizing over 55 years ago. You and AJ should acknowledge basic physics and quit gas-lighting.
” Makes no difference whether it links to hard evidence.”
Your links are pure conspiracy bs.
“At one point in the human experiment people used to base their opinions on evidence. Itās actually a very scientific principle; you should try it, instead of judging a claim solely by its location.”
Earlier you denied basing this issue on science.
“You risk being included in that class.”
Too late.
How would time reversal of the electromagnetic waves put out by radar impact the capabilities of those waves?
“Einstein said if you canāt explain something to a 5-year-old then you must not understand it yourself.”
He didn’t say that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.