Skip to comments.
Groundbreaking spaceplane crashes before landmark aerospike rocket test
https://newatlas.com/ ^
| May 09, 2024
| Joe Salas
Posted on 05/10/2024 4:53:08 AM PDT by Jonty30
It was set to be the world's first flight test for an aerospike rocket engine, but the MIRA I prototype crashed on takeoff before the most innovative part of its propulsion system could fire. Undeterred, Polaris is building two bigger prototypes. The MIRA I, from German aerospace startup Polaris Raumflugzeuge, was traveling at approximately 105 mph (169 km/h) during takeoff when a "landing gear steering reaction" plus a side wind caused a "hard landing event," rendering the space plane inoperable and it's fiberglass airframe damaged beyond repair. Its subsystems remained mostly intact – however, rather than attempt to repair the prototype spaceplane, Polaris has opted to decommission the 4.25-meter (13.9-ft) long MIRA I to go ahead with the identically shaped 5 m (16 ft) MIRA II and III design. Basically larger copies of the MIRA I.
(Excerpt) Read more at newatlas.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Education; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Groundbreaking indeed. Good job editor.
1
posted on
05/10/2024 4:53:08 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
To: Jonty30
Maybe Editor should have said “Earth-shattering?”
2
posted on
05/10/2024 4:58:48 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: Jonty30
Photo looks like some Nazi scientist design was bushed off and used.
Straight out of Captain America cartoon
.
3
posted on
05/10/2024 5:04:58 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: Jonty30
Fiberglass airframe? I’m no aviation expert, but it sounds like it was too light…
4
posted on
05/10/2024 5:05:38 AM PDT
by
telescope115
(I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
To: Jonty30
Looks very 1950’s. Hopefully they gathered enough data to go back to the drawing board.
To: telescope115
Probably, but I think it’s meant to be a proof-of-concept. If they can get it to work in principle, then they can invest more in a proper model.
6
posted on
05/10/2024 5:11:49 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(He hunted a mammoth for me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
To: Jonty30
What part of the ground was broken?
7
posted on
05/10/2024 5:18:12 AM PDT
by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: Jonty30; 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 2sheds; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; ...
Aviation Ping!.....................
8
posted on
05/10/2024 5:20:19 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: telescope115
Well, at least it wasn’t Carbon Fiber.................
9
posted on
05/10/2024 5:20:51 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Yo-Yo
10
posted on
05/10/2024 5:21:49 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: ComputerGuy
The runway.................
11
posted on
05/10/2024 5:22:59 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Jonty30
The usual load of goofy comments! It is a very promising concept - a more efficient, and potentially more valuable spacecraft than the Shuttle.
It was a test model; they break. Sometimes those "failures" make the next version even better because you learn from those events.
The design is an efficient-looking lifting body and what all of you miss, this is a small firm that is making progress in a new and exciting direction. A future spacecraft that takes off from the ground and can fly directly into orbit without boosters, separate stages, and more heavy and expensive parts.
And for the goof that said "it looks too light" - yes, you don't know anything at all about aircraft design.
12
posted on
05/10/2024 5:27:14 AM PDT
by
Chainmail
(You can vote your way into Socialism - but you will have to shoot your way out.)
To: MeanWestTexan
13
posted on
05/10/2024 5:27:42 AM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: Jonty30
Yup. We’ll see how the later models fare. Hope they are successful!
14
posted on
05/10/2024 5:29:39 AM PDT
by
telescope115
(I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
To: texas booster
The MIRA I prototype, shown in what's presumably a screenshot taken from video moments before its unscheduled disassembly
15
posted on
05/10/2024 5:30:54 AM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: texas booster
16
posted on
05/10/2024 5:32:33 AM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: MeanWestTexan
(Photo looks like some Nazi scientist design was bushed off and used.)
Look at the engineering team in the photo. Nazis would be insulted with that comment. Too much diversity in that picture. Probably why it crashed.
17
posted on
05/10/2024 5:34:33 AM PDT
by
Macho MAGA Man
(The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
To: texas booster
Exactly. Needs Red Skull at the controls laughing maniacally.
18
posted on
05/10/2024 5:38:40 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: Jonty30
. . . it’s meant to be a proof-of-concept.
Yes. I'm sure all they want to do is get high and fast enough to show that they can make the aerospike work, and get some data on performance.
Getting to orbit is all about speed. You can get high with low speeds (which, for orbiting spacecraft, can be something around Mach 2). Orbit requires about Mach 20. So the real issue is getting high enough to reduce drag, then go fast. Back when we had the Space Shuttle, if you watch the films you see that they got to Mach 1 at less than one minute into the (almost) nine minute main burn.
Most of that main burn was spent high enough that the bells on the engines were very efficient. Picking up a little efficience (with the aerospike) at Mach 3-4, and losing it from Mach 4 to Mach 20 doesn't sound like a very good optimization.
But I'm all for letting them try, particularly since NASA is not involved. The NASA of nowadays (all DEI and government bureaucrats) has ruined anything manned for the last 30 years.
19
posted on
05/10/2024 5:39:11 AM PDT
by
Phlyer
To: Phlyer
The Show Enterprise, I believe, had this in their intro. A plane that hits high orbits and costs around the earth before coming to a landing wherever it destined.
20
posted on
05/10/2024 5:43:07 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(He hunted a mammoth for me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson