Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CDC’s Latest Myocarditis Study is a Con Job
American Thinker ^ | 10 May, 2024 | W.A. Eliot

Posted on 05/10/2024 4:43:27 AM PDT by MtnClimber

The CDC claims there's nothing to see around the issue of vaccinated young athletes suddenly dropping dead.

Stung by media reports of young athletes dropping dead seemingly often and everywhere, and sensitive to the claim that studies relying on the passive VAERS reporting system drastically underreport vaccine events including deaths, the CDC looked at Oregon death certificates in an effort to eliminate reporting bias on COVID-19 vaccination deaths. Here are excerpts of the abstract of its April 11, 2024 study:

COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with myocarditis in adolescents and young adults, and concerns have been raised about possible vaccine-related cardiac fatalities in this age group…To assess this possibility, investigators searched death certificates for Oregon residents aged 16–30 years who died during June 2021–December 2022 for cardiac or undetermined causes of death. For identified decedents, records in Oregon’s immunization information system were reviewed for documentation of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination received ≤100 days before death…No death certificate attributed death to vaccination. These data do not support an association between receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and sudden cardiac death among previously healthy young persons. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months to prevent COVID-19 and complications, including death.

I know exactly what you’re thinking: “There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises. I don’t see anything like that on line yet — is it underway?”

Answer: Yes, right here.

The CDC admits there is a small probability of COVID vaccine-induced myo- or pericarditis (henceforth “myo”), see, e.g., here and here, but it can’t get itself to admit there is any measurable risk of COVID vaccine-induced myo death, even to the point of dishonesty. So let’s do the calculations ourselves.

In an Israeli Pfizer study appearing in the October 2021 NEJM...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: cardiac; cdc; covid; deepstate; heart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “The point is swine flu was pulled with far fewer side effects or fatalities than the clot shots.”

No, the point is there were no reasons to continue the swine flu vaccination program because there were no incidents of swine flu.

Important Quote: “In the ensuing weeks and months, not one related swine flu case was reported elsewhere in New Jersey, the USA or anywhere else in the world.” IOW, there was no pandemic requiring vaccination.

Q: Is the current flu outbreak a replay of the experience of 1976?
A: There are clear parallels and striking distinctions between the situation then and now. In ’76, the virus was detected in a single military installation, at Fort Dix, New Jersey. In the ensuing weeks and months, not one related swine flu case was reported elsewhere in New Jersey, the USA or anywhere else in the world. By contrast, today’s H1N1 variant has demonstrated a capacity for multi-generational human-to-human transmission. A second important difference, when it comes to response capacity, is that we now have a wider armamentarium of possible interventions – antiviral medicines in addition to the potential for a vaccine. Third, 9/11 and the anthrax attacks in the USA have led to heightened preparedness for bioterrorism and natural disease outbreaks. The experience of SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome] and the global notice of avian influenza have likewise stimulated monitoring capacity, preparedness and international cooperation. The open and prompt reporting of cases – that has been a hallmark of the current episode – stands in contrast to the 2003 SARS experience.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686218/#:~:text=In%20‘76%2C%20the%20virus%20was,anywhere%20else%20in%20the%20world.


41 posted on 05/14/2024 8:18:13 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Sounds like it might be historic revisionism 33 years later; when the profitability of jabs for Big Pharma (everything cured by $$$) was fully ensconsed.

Nice try though.

Hint: You idiots threw away your credibility to the point people are now correctly questioning even long past behavior by the pharma/govt complex.

Too many examples to list.


42 posted on 05/14/2024 9:01:51 AM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Owen

...there were essentially no deaths in Asia until variants arrived. The original virus did not kill Japanese or Thais or Koreans. Chinese numbers were not obfuscated, but they did have their own definition of attribuion. Regardless, that virus killed Americans and spared Asia. The mutations stopped sparing Asia.

Nobody wants to examine this. 

 

A real puzzle.

 

Cui bono?

43 posted on 05/14/2024 10:03:30 AM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “Hint: You idiots threw away your credibility to the point people are now correctly questioning even long past behavior by the pharma/govt complex.”

Hint: The anti-vaxxer conspiracy idiots threw away their credibility by crying wolf to the point where people are now correctly questioning even long past behavior by the anti-vaxxers.


44 posted on 05/14/2024 10:05:54 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Now you're reduced to plagiarism and a factually incorrect attempt at the tu quoque fallacy.

Almost forgot.

Because SCIENCE!TM

45 posted on 05/14/2024 11:11:34 AM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Since plagiarism is the use of another’s work, words, or ideas without attribution and since I provided attribution, it cannot be plagiarism.


46 posted on 05/14/2024 11:47:09 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson