Posted on 03/02/2024 2:57:41 PM PST by Cronos
Rust, Go (Golang), and Java are three distinct programming languages, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Let’s compare these languages across various dimensions to help you make an informed choice:
Performance: Rust: Rust is known for its excellent performance, particularly in system-level programming and scenarios where low-level control over memory is essential. It can often outperform Go and Java in these domains.
Go: Go offers good performance, especially for concurrent applications. While not as low-level as Rust, it is faster than many dynamically typed languages.
Java: Java also offers good performance due to its Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation and optimization. It is often used in enterprise applications, server-side software, and Android app development.
2. Memory Safety:
Rust: Rust is lauded for its memory safety guarantees, enforced by its ownership and borrowing system. It prevents common programming errors like null pointer dereferences and data races at compile time.
Go: Go provides memory safety through garbage collection and runtime checks, which simplifies memory management for developers.
Java: Java offers memory safety through its garbage collector, which automatically manages memory allocation and deallocation.
3. Concurrency:
Rust: Rust supports concurrency through libraries like “async/await” and the “tokio” framework, but it doesn’t have built-in features like Go’s goroutines and channels.
Go: Go is designed with built-in support for concurrency through goroutines and channels, making it easy to write concurrent programs.
Java: Java has a mature concurrency model with its “java.util.concurrent” package and support for multithreading. While not as lightweight as Go’s goroutines, it can handle concurrent tasks effectively.
4. Ecosystem:
Rust: Rust’s ecosystem is growing rapidly, with a focus on systems programming and safety. It has libraries for web development, databases, and more.
Go: Go has a well-established ecosystem for building scalable network services, microservices, and web applications. It is particularly strong in the area of DevOps and cloud-native development.
Java: Java boasts a vast ecosystem and is commonly used in enterprise software development, with libraries and frameworks available for a wide range of domains.
5. Syntax and Ease of Learning:
Rust: Rust’s syntax and ownership system can be challenging for beginners, leading to a steeper learning curve.
Go: Go is known for its simple and minimalistic syntax, making it easy to learn and read.
Java: Java has a more verbose syntax compared to Rust and Go but is generally considered easy to learn for developers familiar with C-like languages.
6. Use Cases:
Rust: Ideal for systems programming, game development, and scenarios where low-level memory control and safety are crucial.
Go: Well-suited for web development, network services, microservices, and concurrent applications.
Java: Commonly used in enterprise software, server-side applications, Android app development, and large-scale systems.
7. Community and Support:
All three languages have active communities and strong support from their respective organizations (Rust by Mozilla, Go by Google, and Java by Oracle/AdoptOpenJDK).
8. Tooling:
Rust, Go, and Java all have robust tooling, including package managers, integrated development environments (IDEs), and build systems.
Ultimately, the choice between Rust, Go, and Java depends on your project’s specific requirements, your team’s expertise, and your development goals. Each language has its niche and excels in certain use cases, so consider these factors carefully when making your decision.
Agree. I’m looking into it. I’ve been focused on C# and Python for a while, but want to expand.
My son will be doing AP Computer Science next school year, I’ll have to teach myself Java so I’ll be able to understand what he is doing.
If your a python fan checkout the “pyo3” library for rust. Could prove handy to speed up any python algorithms not already bound to a C library.
I personally think Mojo will eat Rust’s lunch.
It’s also a systems language, has most (if not all) of Rust’s memory safety, but is much more approachable and also integrated with the Python ecosystem.
Mojo’s technical chops are impeccable, it’s main architect is Chris Lattner. It leverages MLIR, the latest LLVM technology, allowing straightforward programming of GPUs for instance.
I should have provided a link:
https://www.modular.com/max/mojo
It’s (cleverly) positioned as an AI language right now, but make no mistake - it’s a full-fledged general purpose language!
I got approved in my former teaching job to add Comp SciA to the curriculum. I was familiar with other languages but no Object Oriented languages. I found Java to be fun and fun to teach, go for it
I hear GO is the new thing, with Java is what they’re teaching in colleges these days. But what about web languages at all? These platforms are built on like PHP and Pearl?
Am I just old?
And what about Lenox shell? Are we just throwing that out to the curb as well?
Thanks!
Sounds interesting. I’m going to check it out. I’m part of two AI working groups for my org. Right now, we are just evaluating vendor offerings. But hopefully we’ll get to expand on that and go into it in more depth.
Python. And when you want Rusts speed and concurrency to crunch numbers use Polars.
Rust looks like a great choice for the future
Programing and has no future. Around 50% of all programming code is created by AI now. In a couple years, it’ll be way over 90%.
The bottom line about a language is, how quickly can you staff a team that has knowledge in that language and rates are manageable, and allows you to handle turnover, when developers leave, and you have to bring in new people and have them hit the ground running?
Somebody still has to know how to read the code AI produces, and knows how to properly phrase the requirements of the code.
By the way, I don’t think this is a good thing. Open AI and Microsoft are creating a monster now. The new AI they’re creating is going to make the current ones look like model Ts. Musk is suing OpenAI and Microsoft. The lawsuit mentions the new AI.
A lot of coding still involves integrating legacy systems, that’s something AI, at least in the near future, won’t be able to do.
What you say is an old argument. AI is going to be able to check its code and run simulations use natural speech. Right now, in a prompt you could just say create me a game that does this or that, and it will create all the code and run it. Websites can be created under 30 minutes now. Writers and artists will become a thing of the past too. We are traveling down a very scary road.
The most scary thing is that video and audio generated by AI will be indistinguishable from the real thing.
So anything you see that doesn’t conform to your worldview, will simply be dismissed as being “fake” and generated by AI.
Perhaps this is what the Bible was talking about in Revelations: “And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie”.
Is Rust pronounced like Roost?
I am thinking a commercial program written in Rust (like metallic rust) might have some marketing handicaps.
Which companies or sites are using Mojo?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.