Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coming Soon: Lockdowns to Save the Environment?
The Messenger ^ | 22 Jan, 2024 | Kristin Tate

Posted on 01/23/2024 7:02:31 AM PST by MtnClimber

Many Americans are only now beginning to realize the devastating impacts that COVID lockdowns had on our society, as many businesses struggle still to recover and children try to catch up with missed learning opportunities. But what if the pandemic was just a trial run for more drastic restrictions and lockdowns related to climate change?

After decades of arguing that the world is at a climate tipping point, Democrats may try to enact restrictions to stop perceived global warming at an order of magnitude larger than the COVID-19 measures imposed during the height of the pandemic. And considering the pandemic’s ability to bring out authoritarian streaks in our leaders, this should be worrying for most Americans. Some claim that climate change is the “greatest health crisis of our time,” and Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates agrees it could be worse than the pandemic.

Some bureaucrats are already laying the foundation for climate-related restrictions. For example, states such as New York and California have moved to ban the use of fossil fuel-powered vehicles, lawnmowers, and stoves.

A combination of efforts could build, perhaps coercing mass support for draconian regulations and soft environmental lockdowns over the next decade. Do you really need a gasoline lawn mower, anyway? For many young people and city dwellers who don’t drive regularly, cut grass, or individually heat their homes, such actions to curb energy use may seem like no-brainers. Whether it’s a liberal U.S. president or some party apparatchik abroad, the restrictions will be packaged in some panacea like a scaled-down Green New Deal. There likely would be sweeteners — for example, perhaps your student loan could be eligible for dismissal if you voluntarily give up going to the office or owning a car.

What, exactly, might environmental restrictions mean for ordinary Americans? Short flights could be banned, as France has done to “fight climate change,” or a carbon tax could be levied on travel. Some measures may be imposed through involuntary changes, such as a four-day school week. Such a change likely would be difficult for families working traditional schedules, but this hurdle will be framed as being for “the greater good” of the climate. A four-day mandatory workweek could do the same for families whose kids attend schools with traditional schedules.

Local governments and utilities might limit access to power. A Colorado utility recently came under fire for changing its customers’ thermostats without their knowledge, and the same happened in Texas during extreme heat. Restrictions on gasoline cars could lead to a de facto rationing regime similar to that during the 1973 oil embargo. If you’re old enough, you’ll have bad memories of being able to purchase fuel only on certain days.

But a climate lockdown will not be an all-hands-on-deck event, such as with the start of the pandemic. Those on the political left and in the administrative state know that hitting Americans with one regulation or tax or ban at a time may not spark a sharp reaction. Rather than mandating that you can’t leave your house, for example, you may slowly notice over several years that your work and personal habits have been restricted one step at a time.

Many of the changes produced by the COVID lockdowns have made Americans more accustomed to severe measures. Earlier this month, a New York City school switched from in-person classes to remote learning in order to house migrants during severe weather. Yet there are many reasons why such a restriction is a bad idea: Learning outcomes during the pandemic were disastrous, especially for younger students. Test scores, basic fundamentals, socialization, and behavioral issues all became worse because teachers unions and Democratic policymakers insisted that schools had to close during COVID — in some cases lasting into 2022.

When a precedent is set, the genie is out of the bottle. Schools could institute remote learning instead of a snow day or for a “climate day.” Once there is a model for institutions to scrap tradition for electronic facsimiles, the building blocks of a new lockdown are in place...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: climate; communism; despotism; lockdowns; restrictions; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: ClearCase_guy

Good luck with controlling a population armed to the teeth and pissed off beyond imagination.


21 posted on 01/23/2024 7:42:01 AM PST by jimbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

And what will the average lifespan of an enforcer be?


22 posted on 01/23/2024 7:42:45 AM PST by nonliberal (Z.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
For example, states such as New York and California have moved to ban the use of fossil fuel-powered vehicles, lawnmowers, and stoves.

And meanwhile, government leaders in places like New York and California are begging companies to force their employees back to work after they’ve been working from home for four years. For many types of jobs, commuting to an office in 2024 is the biggest waste of time and energy in the history of human civilization.

My prediction is that the COVID fiasco is going to turn out to be one of the best things that ever happened to this country … because many of the gullible fools who fell for that crap (including many here on this website) aren’t going to be so easily fooled the next time.

23 posted on 01/23/2024 7:45:41 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Temperatures drop quite rapidly in the afternoon here in Florida despite a lack of wind.

The CO2 in the atmosphere is not a good insulator.


24 posted on 01/23/2024 7:45:52 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot
IMHO, they won't do a regulatory "lockdown". The mechanism they seem to be doing is through increasing energy costs "to save the planet". They're trying to make it too expensive to be comfortable, or too expensive to drive as much as you want. So they lower that activity by making it cost too much to use "too much" of.

Only the rich and the "right people" will have as much access to energy as they want. The left will allow us plebes to have more energy if we earn it with a good social credit score or mark of the beast type social control over our lives and beliefs.

It's past time us conservatives worked to make ourselves, our families, and our neighborhoods spiritually healthy so that we stick to God like glue no matter the pressure applied to us. And we should also work to make ourselves more self-reliant so that the left has less control over us anyway.

25 posted on 01/23/2024 7:46:34 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“government leaders in places like New York and California are begging companies to force their employees back to work”

Women are scared to walk streets lined with tents.

Companies simply can’t function without female workers, so the women have to be accommodated with the ability to work from home.


26 posted on 01/23/2024 7:49:10 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Earlier this month, a New York City school switched from in-person classes to remote learning in order to house migrants during severe weather.


It was stopped when the light was shined on it.

Folks, get you arc lamps out and use them.


27 posted on 01/23/2024 7:58:02 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

“Only the rich and the “right people” will have as much access to energy as they want.”

I’m sorry, Mr. Kerry, the ration law applies to you too.

But my servants in the basement surely are entitled to quotas too.

Indeed, they are, Mr. Kerry.


28 posted on 01/23/2024 7:58:38 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

remember friends, multiple countries have spent trillions to lock down Afghanistan and the Afghan people. yes it’s a middle East 3rd world nation but so will WE be.


29 posted on 01/23/2024 7:59:16 AM PST by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the Fes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

People, like lemmings, will do exactly as they are told just like we did during the last lock down. Not only that but by voting for demons rats they are voting for lock downs.


30 posted on 01/23/2024 8:29:50 AM PST by Ronald77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Never happen.. the backlash would be deadly.


31 posted on 01/23/2024 8:35:25 AM PST by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I am certain that lockdowns are being considered as another way to control the masses. However, while people like sheep mostly accepted the COVID lockdowns and restrictions out of unfounded fears mongering…”you don’t want to kill grandma” I believe most would not willingly accept such restrictions for climate change. The COVID lockdowns also made people aware of the consequences, many closed small businesses didn’t reopen, distance learning was a dismal failure especially for grade schoolers and social distancing created mental health problems. The lockdowns did have a few positives, parents saw firsthand the indoctrination their kids were getting in school and the practicality of remote working was demonstrated creating a new paradigm for businesses.


32 posted on 01/23/2024 8:36:47 AM PST by The Great RJ ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

climate emergency!

the death of liberty for the greater good


33 posted on 01/23/2024 8:48:27 AM PST by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I will not comply in the least if they do this insane BS again


34 posted on 01/23/2024 9:00:43 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

But you would be a god in prison for waxing a lockdown enforcer. Sadly not enough of them were killed during the Covid lockdowns to have taught them a lesson.


35 posted on 01/23/2024 9:08:52 AM PST by nonliberal (Z.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Anyone who tries to enforce that on me will be putting their life at risk.

Enough of this sh*t.


36 posted on 01/23/2024 9:14:34 AM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot
So, who is going to “enforce” this lockdown?

The police, just like before.

37 posted on 01/23/2024 9:25:16 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal
And what will the average lifespan of an enforcer be?

If any resistance appears to be effective, the National Guard will back up the police.

38 posted on 01/23/2024 9:26:26 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Can’t function without women? Is that a joke?


39 posted on 01/23/2024 9:56:50 AM PST by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right
IMHO, they won't do a regulatory "lockdown". The mechanism they seem to be doing is through increasing energy costs "to save the planet". They're trying to make it too expensive to be comfortable, or too expensive to drive as much as you want.

Obama's first science advisor wanted gas at $8 per gallon to save the planet.

40 posted on 01/23/2024 9:57:39 AM PST by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson