You’d have more success keeping Haley off the ballot by criticizing her actual policy positions than by taking another L on the subject of birthright citizenship.
If it means that much to you, advocate for Congress to introduce a statute, or for a Constitutional amendment, to codify the definition of “natural born citizen” that you desire. Because as it stands, current statute/court precedent is overwhelmingly stacked against you.
1. “...advocate for a statute, or for a Constitutional amendment, to codify the definition of “natural born citizen” that you desire.”
If the definition of nbC is so blatantly abused now, what makes you think that that would make a difference (”Okay, now we’re really going to follow the law”) ?
2. “... current statute/court ruling is overwhelmingly stacked against you.”
Read the article again, with comprehension this time.
-fJRoberts-
All of what you vote as adverse judicial outcomes/precedents would vanish in an instant if an on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture reached SCOTUS on a day in which enough justices had eaten their Wheaties.
This idea shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the natural law influence from whence the founders derived "natural born citizen."
"Natural law" was a big thing in 1776 and 1787. People nowadays do not even know what it is. They don't grasp this "natural law" stuff. They think you can pass a statute to change the laws of nature.
You cannot pass a statute to change the laws of nature.
Don’t go starting to use logic, reasoning and the law on FR!!!!