This idea shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the natural law influence from whence the founders derived "natural born citizen."
"Natural law" was a big thing in 1776 and 1787. People nowadays do not even know what it is. They don't grasp this "natural law" stuff. They think you can pass a statute to change the laws of nature.
You cannot pass a statute to change the laws of nature.
And who has argued that a statute can change the law of nature?
However, it is within the powers of a country to decide who counts as a citizen, and who gets the privileges accorded to a citizen. Such authority lies with the Congress.
The issue is that whatever disagreements there are regarding the meaning of "natural born citizen", the differences between "natural born citizen", "native-born citizen", and "citizen by birth" became de facto and de jure nil within a generation or two of the Founding Fathers, if not earlier; especially with regards to those born within America and subject to her jurisdiction.
You may cite various authorities regarding what the definition of "natural born citizen" is, whereas others will dispute your definition. If you don't want to leave differences of interpretation up to the Supreme Court, then you're going to need a Constitutional amendment codifying the meaning of the term.
That's just the way it is.
Also, i've posted that lawbook from Pennsylvania which flat out says our "citizenship" comes from Vattel, and the people most likely to know what was intended by the Convention (held in Philadelphia in 1787) was the Philadelphia legal community, which is exactly where that book came from.
Aren't you getting tired of citing the same book that you've been refuted on at least three times by my count?
"Natural law" was a big thing in 1776 and 1787. People nowadays do not even know what it is. They don't grasp this "natural law" stuff. They think you can pass a statute to change the laws of nature.You cannot pass a statute to change the laws of nature.
https://youtu.be/xU6eTVZUWJg?si=oU7jzURl87HKg3d6
The Laws of Nature
You cannot pass a statute to change the laws of nature.
That's for sure! They think they can pass laws declaring a man is a woman!