1. “...advocate for a statute, or for a Constitutional amendment, to codify the definition of “natural born citizen” that you desire.”
If the definition of nbC is so blatantly abused now, what makes you think that that would make a difference (”Okay, now we’re really going to follow the law”) ?
2. “... current statute/court ruling is overwhelmingly stacked against you.”
Read the article again, with comprehension this time.
-fJRoberts-
It hits all of the same tired beats that have been ongoing since 2008 at least: citing Vattel's book on *international law*, the Federalist Papers, John Jay's letter to Washington...
Beyond contemporary references to current political events, the argument is quite literally nothing new.