[one guy in new jersey]

All of what you vote as adverse judicial outcomes/precedents would vanish in an instant if an on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture reached SCOTUS on a day in which enough justices had eaten their Wheaties.

[Ultra Sonic 007]

All of what you vote as adverse judicial outcomes/precedents would vanish in an instant if an on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture reached SCOTUS on a day in which enough justices had eaten their Wheaties.

Wishing for an "on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture" is about as effective as Chris Christie's primary campaign.