[Ultra Sonic 007]

All of what you vote as adverse judicial outcomes/precedents would vanish in an instant if an on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture reached SCOTUS on a day in which enough justices had eaten their Wheaties.

Wishing for an "on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture" is about as effective as Chris Christie's primary campaign.

[one guy in new jersey]

It’s the only circumstance under which a straight answer can be gotten out of SCOTUS. They might mention the requirement in passing when deciding on the Trump ballot issue (14th Amendment “insurrection”).