To: one guy in new jersey; woodpusher
All of what you vote as adverse judicial outcomes/precedents would vanish in an instant if an on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture reached SCOTUS on a day in which enough justices had eaten their Wheaties. Wishing for an "on-point case or controversy with the correct procedural posture" is about as effective as Chris Christie's primary campaign.
14 posted on
01/13/2024 7:23:55 AM PST by
Ultra Sonic 007
(There is nothing new under the sun.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
It’s the only circumstance under which a straight answer can be gotten out of SCOTUS. They might mention the requirement in passing when deciding on the Trump ballot issue (14th Amendment “insurrection”).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson