Leftists Scratch Their Heads As More Abandon Their Ranks

Issues & Insights ^ | 27 Dec, 2023 | I&I Editorial Board

[MtnClimber]

The only thing more uplifting than watching several prominent liberals drift rightward is the cluelessness of those on the left as to why it’s happening.

This drift is obvious enough, since it includes journalists once heralded by the left such as Matt Taibbi (who won a Young America’s Foundation award) and Glenn Greenwald, and Democratic politicians, including Tulsi Gabbard, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (whose speech at a Daily Caller award ceremony drew many loud cheers from the conservative audience), and Sen. John Fetterman (who recently declared that “I am not a progressive”).

Celebrities such as Russell Brand, David Chappelle, and Bill Maher (who “has been riding an asphalt roller over the far left,” according to Townhall) are part of the shift, as are a handful of prominent business leaders, Elon Musk for instance.

That’s to say nothing of the fact that surveys show once tried-and-true liberal constituencies – Hispanics, Asians, blacks, working class, and the young – are abandoning the Democratic party.

It’s not as though these people are suddenly small-government conservatives. They just are waking up to the fact that the left is a cesspool of hatred and intolerance and are looking for the exits.

All of which has caused a lot of confusion on the left. Case in point is a commentary by the New York Times’ Michelle Goldberg, who manages to come up with some theories to explain the realignment.

One is that “celebrity defectors … lurched right after a cancellation or public humiliation.” (In other words, for petty reasons.)

Another is that “the culture of the left is simply less welcoming,” and “people go where people accept them, or are nice to them, and away from people who are mean to them.” (An incredibly odd admission given that the left is supposedly all about “diversity” and “inclusion.”)

But then Goldberg settles on the notion that “Liberals and leftists have lots of excellent policy ideas, but rarely articulate a plausible vision of the future.”

Translation: Even though the left controls every major institution in the country, most notably the news media, it just needs better public relations.

Goldberg’s column was inspired by a 5,700-word behemoth by Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet in the far-left In These Times about the same topic.

These two start by saying that “It’s easy to dismiss many of these high-profile defectors as crackpots or spotlight-seekers, as never truly serious in their political principles or as plain grifters.”

But, after much mental exertion they decide that “Maybe there’s a kind of gravity to the slide, the black hole of fascism sucking toward it all the loose particles of those whose commitments were never complex or whose convictions were snapped by despair.

“That’s what makes fascism so scary when it genuinely flares. It consumes. It grows.”

When in doubt, the left always invokes fascism, ignorant of the fact that national socialism is a leftist dream, not a conservative one.

In any case, the reason the left is puzzled is because it’s so completely blind to the poisonous fruit of its own ideology, something that is finally dawning on common-sense Americans.

For some, it was the totalitarianism of the COVID apparatchiks, who, among countless other wrongs, forced a solidly liberal top executive, Jennifer Sey, out of Levi Strauss because she dared to say that schools shouldn’t remain closed. Sey later noted Levi’s is “trapped trying to please the mob — and silencing any dissent within the organization. In this, it is like so many other American companies: held hostage by intolerant ideologues who do not believe in genuine inclusion or diversity.”

For others, it was the coordinated silencing of dissent by big government and Big Tech (which, by the way, is the very definition of fascism), and the fact that so many on the left, including “democracy dies in darkness” journalists, were cheering it on.

For many in liberal cities such as San Francisco or New York or Chicago, it’s skyrocketing crime, abandoned storefronts, sidewalks full of homeless tents and human waste, and legions of illegal immigrants housed in bus stations, hotels, and abandoned schools. All of it the result of leftist policies.

For still others, it is the many forms of brutal intolerance the left shows toward anyone who doesn’t fall in line with whatever that day’s dogma happens to be, whether it’s school shutdowns, “transgender rights,” the climate “crisis,” or critical race theory. The left is constantly burning former friends at the stake for being heretics.

For many parents, it’s having the government call them domestic terrorists because they complained about lockdowns and gay pornography in their school libraries.

Now, it’s the left’s virulent antisemitism that was always there but only became glaringly apparent in the wake of Hamas’ genocidal attack on Israel.

The intolerance, bitterness and hate, the unquenchable desire for control, disdain for free speech, and fanaticism have always been features – not bugs – of the left, something we’ve been saying here for years.

The only reason leftists have been able to pretend otherwise is that they had better PR. But that, too, is failing them.

We can only hope those on the left continue to scratch their collective heads about why people are leaving their ranks, until one day they end up in the dustbin of history. Where they belong.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

“I’m not convinced of this big right ward shift.”

Being a Socialist/Communist is so, SO easy! And they’ve made it so! Group-Think, Marching Orders, Nazi Salute when called for, Feel Free to BITE the Hand that FEEDS You; Anything Goes! Whatever FEELS GOOD to you in the moment is JUST FINE!

*SPIT*

We’re LUCKY America has made it THIS far with the ENEMY of FREEDOM allowed within our gates! :(

‘republicans’ are USELESS tools. Utterly USELESS.

[DoodleBob]

That’s likely because, as a “Goth Industrial New Wave weirdo” who knows about Bobby Steele, you don’t live in an echo chamber.

When I worked in NYC, I saw how easily people could get sucked in to liberalism. Manhattan is a island and many people don’t go “offshore.” They are generally affluent, think everyone spends $4,500 for an apartment, prefer museums to the range, and think organized religion is stupid. If they DO get off the island, it’s to the Hamptons. However, they tend to have a wide exposure to many people from all walks of life (though they discriminate as their DNC talking points demand).

At the same time, many on our side suffer the same fate but outside of the city. They made an ok living, live in a moderate home, go shooting with friends from church, and rarely go to the city. Their chief exposure to minorities is on the news or the local Chinese restaurant or their record collection.

Of course, I’m stereotyping.

But not by much.

Being in a punk or goth or jazz scene really opens your eyes. You see more people from all over the social and racial strata, find most of them are very similar to yourself, and at their core are a little scared and really want to be accepted. The -isms tend to fall away, and we accept our fellow losers as kin.

To be sure, as I’ve said before, no race has a monopoly on stupid or laziness or bigotry. I’ve met bad dudes across the racial spectrum. That said, the person who came to me in honesty and openness could be a lib, but we could find common ground. Indeed, the very fact that I turned out to NOT be a foaming hater MAY be enough to start a small red-pilling.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

However, they tend to have a wide exposure to many people from all walks of life

No. They don't.

They may walk by those people or have other people hire them to do things for them but they really have no exposure to them as people. You can tell this when they interview the little airheads. "oh minorities are simply incapable of getting ids" "oh such interesting designs" (said about a piece of material that read essentially kill the infidel). Had one of them ask me what people did for work west of the Hudson. She was totally surprised to find that people actually were doctors, lawyers, real estate agents, office workers and all the rest out in the great wilderness.

They live in a tiny bubble and interact with a very tiny circle of people.

Their chief exposure to minorities is on the news or the local Chinese restaurant or their record collection.

Tell me you do not know a single thing about your country without telling me you do not know a single thing about your country.

There are very few areas in the US of A where you will not encounter what you term "minorities". There is no area that is 100% WASP.

I would say your chief concept of what the country looks like comes from you never actually having traveled it.

Take a drive across America. Stick to the state routes and avoid the chain businesses.

You will be surprised at what you find.

[DoodleBob]

Thanks for the reply.

Of course, I’m stereotyping.

But not by much.

If I followed your travel advice, I’d be re-tracking my footsteps.

Manhattanites suffer from/embrace cognitive dissonance just as easily as people from the mainland.

The far left progressives are actually lily white. Nearly seven-in-ten Progressive Left (68%) are White adults, making this group less racially and ethnically diverse than the other Democratic-oriented groups.

Yet, these chiefly white folks hold extremist views not JUST on race…

…but on a plethora of matters. Indeed, this lot holds more extreme views overall than those held by more racially-diverse Dem groups.

These whites live in enclaves in cities, prefer going to museums over going to the range, and think religion is sophistry. Their policies and language all reek of a Superiority Complex.

In my experience, this lot is fixed in their ways and sniff at anyone who dares to challenge their notions.

The flip side to this group is also largely (85%) white and are also among the most likely to live in rural communities. In general, they mirror FReepers..

This lot, too, has blind spots that, based on interactions, emanate from lack of exposure to actual _____ people.

With maximum liberty and freedom, we can freely associate. That’s why we are seeing libs come to our side.