Posted on 12/25/2023 5:21:01 AM PST by RandFan
@P_McCulloughMD
Two peer reviewed papers from Drs Peter Parry, Julian Gillespie et al highlighted multi-organ system damage/death from COVID-19 vaccines. They are calling for a halt in mass vaccination
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Australia government figures it killed enough of its subjects for now and the sheep are getting wise to the side effects.
Way too little.... WAY TOO LATE!
Not is shameful America yet. The regime and the MSM, which also includes FOX, are still lying and advertising this poison.
America has become an evil place.
is=in
Now do global warming.
Maybe THE most militant government when it came to forcing the little tested experimental treatments on its people.
Yes, Australia and NZ were authoritarian to the hilt in the Covid reign of terror.
too late, whitey.
25% of those who’ve received one jab are on the 5 year plan now.
mission accomplished.
Was just reading past Free Republic articles and comments regarding Ivermectin and the jab.
Government, pharmaceuticals, and doctors who pushed the jab and denied Ivermectin will one day be held accountable for what they did to humanity.
My wife got vaccinated in September 23 and caught the Covid on Dec 18th. I have not been vaccinated and caught it 2 days later. Might as well not take it since it doesn’t work and roll w the punches. 5 days later on Rona therapy and feeling 90%.
it won't be in this life.
I know.
RE: Two peer reviewed papers from Drs Peter Parry, Julian Gillespie et al
The least he could do in the Tweet is to provide a link to the paper or tell us in which scientific journal the paper was published, the title, date of publication, etc.
Serious people can’t just go by a Tweet
Australia, along with New Zealand already went full Nazi on the vaxx. Not much more harm they could have done.
My daughter and friend are flying to Australia tomorrow and taking a cruise boat around the various interesting islands. Good because her beloved husband died two months ago and all she does is cry.
I hope the ship is not pushing vaxes. As I recall, she had one when Covid first was announced because she and her husband went to Maui. Her MD was not a vax pusher but gave her necessary a shot of the least horrible vax.
“AUSTRALIA pausing the VAX?”
someone’s fantasy ... in reality land they’re doubling down:
https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=australia+%22covid+vaccination%22&qs=n
https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=593610628&q=australia+%22covid+vaccination%22&tbm=nws
Even the Microsoft search you used shows the boosters are increasingly unpopular — it’s surprising the bing censors let that slip through.
TOO LATE!
‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA.
In order to come up with the conclusion that the spike protein itself is pathogenic, they referred to two other papers.
The first of these is this research paper, "SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19," where the authors report that they found that platelets which had been exposed to spike protein from either the virus or the vaccine would aggregate when exposed to a chemical that causes aggregation (i.e. clotting). This means that the spike protein primed the cells to aggregate, not that it causes them to aggregate on their own.
The second of these is The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds and modulates estrogen receptors. These authors report that they found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Since ERα is a cytosolic protein, this means that the virus already has to be inside cells before this binding can happen.
Neither of these papers used as "evidence" that the spike protein is itself pathogenic actually shows that. They show that the spike protein can mimic (some) activities of hormones when it binds to the receptors activated by those hormones. They hypothesize that some of the pathogenic effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated through these hormone mimicking activities.
The review, overall, is not worth reading, because it took a premise and only referenced papers that the authors could use to advance that premise. That is not the proper use of the review process.
Now, let's attempt to understand relative risk as it applies to Covid vaccines vs. Covid disease. A Covid vaccine causes the production of a limited amount of spike protein for a few hours. The spike protein might stick around for a few days, after which it is no longer present. A SARS-CoV-2 virus is literally covered with spike protein, and it forces the body to keep churning out more spike protein for weeks. So, given a choice between a little dose from a vaccine and a large, prolonged dose from a Covid infection, which choice is more likely to cause health issues?
Hyperbolic exaggeration of the rare serious adverse effects of vaccines while completely avoiding any mention of the common serious adverse effects of infection is done for one purpose. It is done in order to scare people away from using vaccines. Those who try to scare people away from vaccines do so because they don't care if people die or their health is permanently impaired. A lot of times, they only care about the money they get from selling snake oil which (they promise) will completely replace your immune system.
And, finally, no, Australia is not discontinuing the distribution of vaccines. The government of Australia actually wants more people to stay alive. Living people = more tax collections. Dead people = no taxes collected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.