Posted on 12/14/2023 1:52:39 AM PST by nikos1121
SCOTUS has the ability, they are the only ones, to reset this whole mess, and restore the dignity to the Presidency and Dept of Justice.
Take the name TRUMP out of the lawsuits, and it would be easy to see that the prosecutions are an injustice to this man, because, with ANY other defendant, all cases would be thrown out long ago.
In short, the SCOTUS alone can bring common sense to all the arguments and issues being raised here.
A 9-0 ruling to throw out all these ridiculous lawsuits against Trump and others, would go far to unite the country.
If it comes back 5 to 4, or even 6 to 3 a win for Trump, it won’t put this thing to rest but initiate further resentment of our system from both sides.
But, Heaven forbid we lose 5 to 4, or worse yet 6 to 4, then this country is doomed, as it will open up a pandora’s box of lawsuits from “our side against their side”, and give further incentives to the left-wing radicals in media, DOJ, and Congress, among other entities to go after Trump and other conservatives.
Most of all, it will destroy the balance of power in the third wing of our government probably forever. Any future or even past presidency can now be sued for just about anything, but also in civil court?
Think about that in the context of what Americans, since our founding have seen and endured. We need all three equal branches of government.
Surely, there is common sense somewhere in the system to put us back to a time when we had respect for one another, and where we accepted vote outcomes, good or bad, but when we also had the right to voice a complaint about the integrity of the elections, without facing imprisonment.
There was no Trump-induced insurrection, everyone knows that.
The J-6 demonstration was mostly peaceful, conducted mostly by Peaceful God-fearing Americans. Everyone knows that.
Dozens if not a couple hundred, FBI and other agents intentionally instigated some to not be peaceful. Everyone with any common sense knows that too.
For all we know, the people who rioted and destroyed property could have been Antifa or BLM or even planted agents.
The 44,000 hours of J-6 video have been released, BUT THE FACES OF THE PARTICIPANTS ARE BEING BLURRED OUT? WHY?
Every one of the lawsuits against Trump is politically motivated. Everyone knows that, and people like Liz Cheney and this guy Kinsinger are mentally ill for all we know.
Let us pray that the SCOTUS puts this whole mess to rest with a strong ruling on the side of what is fair and right for all Americans and future presidents.
There’s not one 9-0 decision that’s going to throw out all lawsuits agsinst President Trump and others.
I wonder if might be 9 to 0 against Trump? Nothing would surprise me.
No president from here on will want to hand their enemies a sword by making controversial decisions.
.
You see many local Prosecutors bringing cases against Trump.
How many have tried to do that to Joe?
Joe admitted on Video to crimes before even running for Prez (Ukrainian Prosecutor).
How about Bill Clinton’s complete and total ability to decide which Prez records are personal and private - and that ruling said that declassification is also something that can be done by an ex-president for records during his Administration at will.
DC is about preserving the Deep State and increasing Centralized Control.
They are about taking Trump out.
My opinion has no bearing on what the mis-named court we are talking about will decide.
That said, I wouldn’t be holding my breath waiting for a breathtaking decision.
Has any decision by anyone in government gone 100% for truth, common sense, individual rights, or the God blessed Constitution of the United States of America in the last ten years or so?
If we are up to using the power of prayer as a means of helping the decision process, we might perhaps have a smidgeon of hope that our wishes might be granted. We unfortunately aren’t generally on the frequency that God the Father, his Son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are on, relative to how their plan will shake out in our historical setting.
Does that mean we give up? That option should not be exercised as we know that liberty and agency are principles enshrined in the Founding documents of this God ordained land of freedom. Should we lose our agency or freedom we are no longer able to worship the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as is our right, and then what?
One need only contemplate what our Founding Fathers and those who stood with them, had to give of themselves to birth the miracle of the United States of America. It is to be found in the last paragraph and last sentence of the Declaration of Independence.
There were many who gave of their lives their fortunes and their sacred honor to give us a free nation they would never personally benefit from.
Many many living under the banner of freedom today prefer the rule of man to the rule of law ordained by the One our Founders regarded as the Supreme Judge of the world.
...and yes I would agree that a good start on restoration of the rule of law would be the repeal of the seventeenth amendment.
Praying. 🙏
First of all....the Dems on the USSC will never go for it.....your ridiculous blip is just that...a ridiculous blip.
Never gonna happen.
I've been waiting on a (civil) war since I was @ 30 years old. I'm 61 now and physically falling apart. Let's have a divided USSC ruling and light this candle now. I'm getting too old for this sh*t to keep waiting much longer.
I think we all know it's going to happen, I've resigned myself to that. Let's just get it over with already. It's been building for a looooooooooooooooooong time.
As I've said before, the Deep State can only be taken down by disgruntled insiders.
Unanimous? If it is, you are not going to like the outcome.
So they DID add a 10th Justice seat? Guess I missed it.
Anyway, 9-0 is a pipedream however you parse it. "The 3" will always vote together or face the torches and pitchforks.
While I’d like to see the rat/uniparty spanked so hard they get a bad case of raw baboon butt and can’t sit for a month, I agree with a lot of others here, this SCOTUS will never agree 100% on something like this involving the real President Trump.
Heck, they wouldn’t even take up all the blatant rigged election nonsense that installed the buffoon in office now. That’s a big problem.
If they don’t want to open Pandora’s box
They view Jack Smith as
a champion
with carte blanche
and a letter of marque
with trump as the target.
\/
the ogliarch aristicracy are quite famaliar with this historical tactic.
they mean to have their serfs and slaves back.
One would hope that what you say would be true. Replace “Trump” with “President” and get a 9-0 ruling.
But I fear it would only reinforce Democrats’ calls and intentions to stack the court with their own overriding additional picks if they get a full majority in the WH and Congress. They are really sore losers - this is clearly evidenced by the whining and crying they’re doing over the overturning of Roe v Wade. They were THREATENING and plotting against the Justices who voted for it - remember?
9-0 it can’t be a poll. If ut was a poll it would be 10-0!
Oops! Meant 6 to 3 against which would mean Roberts and Kavenaugh caved.
Huh?
I’m asking for you’re opinion
The Senate does not represent this country
If the Supreme Court justices have any commitment at all to truth, justice, and moral and intellectual clarity and to the Constitution, the USA, and the American People,
They will THOROUGHLY AND HONESTLY evaluate EVERYTHING concerning the 2020 election, INCLUDING:
The possibility of election fraud,Of course this is a monumental task, but NOTHING is more important, and EVERY ASPECT of all this should be THOROUGHLY and TRUTHFULLY evaluated and TRUTHFUL conclusions drawn.The January 6, 2021 protest in Washington, the possibility of entrapment of the protesters, the role of government agents and politicians, the lawfulness of the prosecution of the protesters, and the effect that President Trump had on the demonstration,
ALL aspects of the prosecution of President Trump, whether it has been politically motivated, whether it is legal, whether his possession of classified or declassified material was legal, whether the raid on Mar-a-Lago was legal, whether he should be relieved of all charges or charges should continue, and
EVERYTHING related to all this.
NO legal or constitutional question in US history is more important.
The American People want, need, and deserve to know the TRUTH about all this, once and for all, and the Supreme Court justices have an OBLIGATION to discover and conclude what the TRUTH is.
To do anything less will be to fail utterly in their duty and responsibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.