Posted on 10/15/2023 11:57:58 AM PDT by george76
It does a man’s heart good to know that in the US, all the leftists were obedient sheep, and stepped right up for the vaccine roulette. My only question is why is it taking so long for them to pass? The studies done in Africa with similar vaccine types, only took two years to get 90% of them. Must have weekend the doses.
COVID Vaccines Damage ALL Hearts, Study Finds
Radiology Tests Detect Myocardial Damage in Covid-vaccinated persons
https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-damage-all-hearts
Covid, Ukraine, J6, the elections, even Israel now...
Instead of YOU getting various reports, and choosing what is true and accurate, using your own mind, today you have big tech and government in collusion deciding what is real and not for you, and feeding only that narrative they deem true or accurate.
The problem of course being that the mass censorship you have in the West today is HEAVILY influenced by political and economic considerations and is not objective. The narrative pushed is often no more accurate than what is filtered. That is exactly why all this censorship is a bad idea, something folks figured out a long time ago.
Crazy how mass censorship is sold as a good thing today by government and big tech.
To quote humor column Dave Barry(*), "The Rev. Bud albumin didn't become the leader of one of the fastest-growing evangelical organizations in Central Southwestern Kentucky by accident"
See how many conditions had to be put in to get a sliver that could be construed as favorable?
All *that* statistic shows is that the 3rd clot shot takes more than 3 weeks to kill you: and that's not accounting for those who already succumbed to shots 1and 2 so the3rd one never got the chance to off them.
Suck-start the syringe, troll-boi.
(*) from memory, so it might not be exact.
I am not sure this proves much on its own.
For example, one possible explanation is Selection Bias: people who thought they might be at risk of dying (because they knew enough about themselves to understand they were high risk) might be more likely to take the vaccine boosters than those who were not at high risk. And they were right - they died in higher numbers - proving they were indeed at higher risk. This by itself does not condemn the vaccine.
What is needed instead is to compare precisely how many died versus what the number would have been if random people (those not at high risk) had also taken multiple boosters. Unfortunately I do not think we have that type of information.
Do we have an objective “control group” to properly compare against? https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-a-control-group-606107
Your source link says it all... How many jabs did you get or are you on the monthly plan?
They had to change the dictionary definition of the word vaccine. This should tell us everything we need to know. It is gene therapy, and not very ‘therapeutic.’
I have an amazing immune system. Every 2-3 years my wife will get a cold or the flu, and I do not. (Sometimes it drives my wife crazy). Yes, I have had the flu in my life, but not very often, and not for over 20 years. The idea of messing with my excellent immune system is crazy.
Do not mess with mother nature.
“But what’s curious about the figures is that it’s not the one-dose, or double-vaccinated population who account for the majority of COVID-19 deaths throughout the 12 months, it’s instead the triple and quadruple-vaccinated population that accounted for the majority of COVID-19 deaths. With the most deaths occurring among the quadruple-vaccinated from August 2022 onwards.”
Repeat after me: safe and effective.
When can I call it Genocide?
How much is Pfizer paying you?
Look it up..dugwayduke...
“dugway” proving grounds.
Look it up please.
DOD facility working on biological & chemical agents.
Now you know who you’re posting to.
Of course DD denies involvement with comment “I left before that”, however, you make your own decisions.
‘Nuff said
Anyone who has doubts to what I just posted, ping me.
That poster ABSOLUTELY admitted involvement in the facility, in THIS this. Ping me if you doubt.
AAAAND...now you know the user’s agenda and it all makes sense.
Like I said....
‘Nuff said
It is a bad idea to eliminate a source, simply because they have credentials.
Yet he never acknowledges that mRNA shots are not the traditional vaccines we all taken all our lives. Nor that they were not fully tested. That speaks a lot to credibility.
Are his credentials as good as the experts at the American Tabacco industry who saw no unfavorable link between cigarettes and health?
E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “How much is Pfizer paying you?”
How much do the anti-vaxxers pay you?
You’re the one who never fails to show up to peddle your genocidal globalist dogma.
It’s as if you punch in on a timeclock.
It is well documented at this point. The CDC, in particular, may never recover from its loss of credibility.
What percentage of the population was vaccinated? If it’s 95 percent, then it would be in line with the number that died.
You mean like Exxon talking about the environmental effects of oil spills?
Or Pfizer talking about how “safe and effective” the clot-shots were going to be?
Have you bothered to follow the data dumps of Pfizer’s own data, which a judge ordered released, after Pfizer moved to have them sealed for 75 years?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.