Posted on 09/20/2023 11:15:50 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Andersson said at the time that while it wasn't what they had agreed on in the contract, the museum got new and interesting art. "When it comes to the amount of $84,000, he hasn't broke any contract yet as the initial contract says we will have the money back on January 16th 2022."
But Haaning refused to turn in the money, according to BBC News. And after a long legal battle, the artist was ordered to refund the court 492,549 Danish kroner – or $70,623 U.S. dollars.
The sum is reduced to include Haaning's artist fee and the cost of mounting the art, according to BBC News.
When Haaning first pulled the stunt, Andersson said he laughed. "Jens is known for his conceptual and activistic art with a humoristic touch. And he gave us that – but also a bit of a wake up call as everyone now wonders where did the money go," he told CBS News in 2021.
According to a news release from Haaning at the time, "the idea behind [it] was to show how salaries can be used to measure the value of work and to show national differences within the European Union." By changing the title of the work to "Take the Money and Run" Haaning "questions artists' rights and their working conditions in order to establish more equitable norms within the art industry."
In a statement in regards to the court ruling, Andersson said: "We now have a judgment, and we will carefully examine it. There is a four-week period for appeal for both parties, and as long as the case can still be appealed, we have no further comments."
The stunt is reminiscent of Banksy, the anonymous artist who often leaves spray-painted artwork in public places, without leaving any other trace of his presence. In 2018, one of the artist's paintings – an image of a girl reaching for a heart-shaped balloon – sold for $1.4 million at auction – and immediately self-shredded in front of auction-goers the moment it was sold.
While the piece essentially self-destructed after the auction, it yielded yet another sale. The shredded pieces of canvas were sold for $25.4 million in October 2021 – a record for the artist.
Similar art antics have made headlines in recent years. A banana duct-taped to a wall at Miami's Art Basel in 2019 sold as an artwork for $120,000 – and then was eaten by performance artist David Datuna at the art convention.
CBS News has reached out to Haaning and the gallery that represents him for further comment and is awaiting response.
What do you think?
I LOVE IT.
Museums will pay stupid people a lot of money for vomit
We deleted meaning from art 100 yrs ago. Funny how the rules of logic keep following the trend.
I hear Senator Sue Collins, age 70, intends to imitate Fetterman by showing up in the Senate in a bikini.
Who wants to see Grassley in a Speedo?
Billy Joe and Bobbie Sue were unavailable for comment.
I think, good for him. He produced what they asked for.
“Who wants to see Grassley in a Speedo?”
Hard pass!
It’s better than a crucifix upside-down in a jar of urine.
Current Communist Goals
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
You know, they got away.
Headed down south and they’re still runnin’ today.
Should have asked what kind of artist?
Scam Artist.
And then they call the vomit “art” so suckers will pay to see it
A wish sandwich of the highest order.
is the artist a democrat or republican
Better...a satirist.
If the canvas had included the words “black lives matter” he would have been allowed to keep all the money.
Modern art is legalized money laundering
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.