Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Pence now Implicitly Admits he had the Power to reject Fraudulent Votes on J6
DC_Draino on Twitter X ^
| August 2, 2023
| DC_Draino
Posted on 08/02/2023 6:14:12 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 last
To: Mariner
Your animus should be pointed at the US Congress.And all those State legislatures that did not intervene.
Believe me, I have much disgust for those unfaithful people, but my animus is extensive enough that I have plenty left over for others arguing to undermine fair elections.
81
posted on
08/03/2023 8:17:24 AM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Alberta's Child
That chapter of US Code was rewritten in 2022 by Congress.
-PJ
82
posted on
08/03/2023 8:58:34 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Macho MAGA Man
83
posted on
08/03/2023 9:03:03 AM PDT
by
Pajamajan
( PRAY FOR OUR be slave in a new Socialist America)
To: Alberta's Child
Yes, I did. It was the US Code since 1948, so it's been in place for 75 years.
FYI... I accidentally post the link to the current code; here is the link to the prior version of the code.
The code was intended to put into law the process for complying with the Constitution.
-PJ
84
posted on
08/03/2023 9:03:29 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Political Junkie Too
That 1948 statute was simply an update of the original Electoral Count Act of 1887. The procedures seem to be identical.
As I posted earlier on this thread, that law should never stand up to constitutional scrutiny if it is challenged -- because it makes it perfectly legal for Congress to reject electoral votes from one or more states even if there was never any dispute about the validity of those electoral votes. That is a blatant violation of the sovereignty of state governments, and has no basis in constitutional law. It's ludicrous to have a law on the books that allows (for example) California to lead an effort in Congress to disqualify the totally legitimate electoral votes of Texas.
85
posted on
08/03/2023 9:16:13 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
To: Alberta's Child
It sounds like it only let's them reject a slate if more than one is submitted from a State.
-PJ
86
posted on
08/03/2023 9:30:20 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Roadrunner383
87
posted on
08/03/2023 11:23:06 AM PDT
by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
Did you happen to even read or understand what I wrote?
88
posted on
08/04/2023 5:58:54 PM PDT
by
crz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson