Posted on 07/27/2023 8:28:51 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
A former intelligence official told lawmakers Wednesday that the federal government has misappropriated funds to retrieve and reverse engineer technology from crashed unidentified flying objects and has “non-human” remains in its possession from these recovery efforts.
During his explosive testimony under oath before the House Oversight Subcommittee on National Security, the Border and Foreign Affairs, David Grusch — a former national reconnaissance officer who served as a member of the Pentagon’s task force on unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP — alleged that the federal government has relied on intimidation, budgetary trickery and classified reporting to conceal its decades-long awareness of extraterrestrial aircraft.
Grusch made international news last month after he publicly shared his allegations.
Over the course of his work, Grusch told lawmakers he was made aware of “a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program,” adding that the government was “absolutely” in possession of recovered craft and has been aware of the existence of non-human aircraft since the 1930s.
“The recoveries pre-date a lot of our work in this area,” he said.
Grusch told lawmakers he filed a whistleblower complaint with the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community regarding the government’s covert actions “following concerning reports from multiple esteemed and credentialed current and former military and intelligence community individuals that the U.S. government is operating with secrecy — above congressional oversight — with regards to UAPs.”
In addition to retrieving downed UAPs, Grusch told lawmakers that “biologics came with some of these recoveries.” While he did not view the remains himself, Grusch said they were “non-human” in origin, based on “the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to.”
Grusch further alleged that the government’s recovery and reverse engineering efforts are subsidized by the “misappropriation of funds” and that he has “specific knowledge” of money budgeted for one program but subsequently redirected to fund UAP-related programs.
“I have concerns, based on the interviews I conducted under my official duties, of potential violations of the Federal Acquisition Regulation,” he added, saying that “specific corporations” have been involved in the government’s UAP programs — details which he said he previously shared with the House and Senate Intelligence committees.
He also said he had personal knowledge of individuals who were harmed to cover up or conceal knowledge of extraterrestrial technology. When asked if he knew of anyone who had been murdered, Grusch said he “directed people with that knowledge to the appropriate authorities.”
Lawmakers expressed concerns about the government’s unwillingness to allow a more detailed summary of Grusch’s allegations in a secure setting. Grusch repeatedly told members he was limited in what he could say during a public hearing.
“We were even denied access to a classified briefing in a [sensitive compartmented information facility] prior to this hearing due to the amount of hoops that we had to jump through to grant temporary clearance to witness Grusch who has knowledge of classified information,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., said.
Congress has taken steps to enhance reporting on UAPs, including establishing the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office last year to investigate sightings. The head of that office, Sean Kirkpatrick, told Senate lawmakers in April that they had found “no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial activity, off-world technology or objects that defy the known laws of physics.”
But lawmakers at Wednesday’s hearing said that the intelligence community’s unwillingness to fully disclose the extent of its activities would not be tolerated moving forward.
“This is an issue of government transparency,” Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said, adding that “we’re going to uncover the coverup.”
“Project Blue Beam”
Perhaps—but it could be about exposing “Project Blue Beam”.
We need as much data as possible—from any source we can get.
The secrecy is just not cutting it.
Keeping it secret for eighty years and claiming it is “national security” is absurd on its face.
~~~
But we are not talking about keeping the Manhattan project a secret anymore. That cat was out of the bag after the bomb got dropped but the secrecy served it’s purpose during WWII, and it’s VERY difficult to keep research projects a secret. I brought that up as an example.
I am just speaking hypothetically because I would need to see a lot more than the equivalent of enquirer articles to make me believe in extraterrestrials visiting earth, but that’s what is being posited here before congress, so that’s the hypothetical I am addressing. If we are making extreme leaps in technological research due to having “non human” technology to study, then you can’t call it “legacy” until after the secret is out and AFTER we have lost our competitive advantage!
The problem with Grusch is that he won’t name names or identify locations where this evidence is stored.
Shiny object
The “secret” is out—but most folks don’t believe it—so I guess it is still “secret”...
;-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t564HRXeS6o
Just show us a hubcap and we wii believe
“he won’t name names or identify locations where this evidence is stored”
...in a public session—so he does not go to jail for violating his security non-disclosure agreements...
It is the job of Congress to decide if they want to release that information—if they keep it secret they are to blame.
That’s just the glare off Jim Thompson’s head.;-)
Nothing new here. Witnesses are always lying to Congress.
Where's my speaking fee? Where's my book deal?
Anyone with security clearances who “shows..a hubcap” would be thrown in jail for a long long time for violating their security agreements.
The skeptics are beginning to irritate me—”show me the hard evidence” when they have to know that doing so is a serious federal crime.
Send me $1,000 and your book manuscript and I’ll make you a star! Please include fuzzy photos of UFO’s and aliens if you have them.
In fact both the Russians and Chinese have had alien craft crash on their soil—and they have recovered them.
If you are truly interested in getting up to speed on this topic here is one place to start:
https://www.amazon.com/RUSSIAS-ROSWELL-INCIDENT-Amazing-Former/dp/1520724004
Lot's of jail time for that if they're lying.
Alright now, that was just mean. ;-D
So Independence Day was right, when they talked about $12,000 hammers.
I’m not familiar with this source. Its “About” page provides the following (among other information):
_______________________
‘Government Executive’ has been around for years. It’s standard reading for those in the executive branch and is generally viewed as a stand-up publication. I used to read it on a regular basis when I was in government.
I heard the news on my truck radio the other day and they said Robert F Kennedy was running for something.
I thought he was assassinated back in 1968.
Have I been in a coma...or just too focused on UFO threads?
As I said to another poster yesterday if these witnesses are willing to risk their lives to take on the Deep State we should not complain if we have to deal with the army of the uninformed.
____________________
Also, remember that they are telling their account under oath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.