Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Oppenheimer’ Review: Christopher Nolan’s Epic Is a Scorching Depiction of America’s Ability to Create and Destroy Its Heroes
Hollywood Reporter ^ | JULY 19, 2023 9:00AM | BY DAVID ROONEY

Posted on 07/20/2023 12:18:45 PM PDT by Red Badger

Cillian Murphy stars as the “Father of the Atomic Bomb” in a stacked ensemble that includes Emily Blunt, Matt Damon, Robert Downey Jr. and Florence Pugh.

Cillian Murphy in 'Oppenheimer' UNIVERSAL PICTURES Both a probing character study and a sweeping account of history, Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a brainy, brawny thriller about the man who led the Manhattan Project to build the bomb that ended World War II. To dispense with the inevitable weapon of mass destruction metaphors, it’s more slow-burn than explosive. But perhaps the most surprising element of this audacious epic is that the scramble for atomic armament ends up being secondary to the scathing depiction of political gamesmanship, as one of the most brilliant scientific minds of the 20th century is vilified for voicing learned opinions that go against America’s arms-race thinking.

Chiseling Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherman’s whopping, definitive biography, American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer, from 700-plus pages into a three-hour screenplay, Nolan hasn’t entirely streamlined the dense plot.

It can feel like a talky thicket of scenes in which men in midcentury business attire stand around in offices and labs having animated discussions about quantum mechanics, which at times lack the elucidation to afford non-physicists much access. It’s a relief when, about an hour in, one of the ever-expanding lineup of theoreticians plops marbles into glass containers to demonstrate the difference between uranium and plutonium as fusion bomb components.

But there’s a method to Nolan’s approach, which becomes increasingly apparent as the two separate Washington hearings laced throughout the narrative intersect in the foreground and occupy the riveting final hour. And the emotionally affecting decision to close with an earlier private conversation between Cillian Murphy’s J. Robert Oppenheimer and Albert Einstein (Tom Conti) elegantly brings it all back to the personal views of two men looking at their branch of science from different perspectives.

While the four-act structure asks a lot of the film’s audience, our patience and concentration are amply rewarded as the 1945 “Trinity” test in the New Mexico desert makes way for the devastating bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That defining moment in modern human history — crowning Oppenheimer as an American hero even as corrosive moral qualms play out across Murphy’s expressive face — then segues to a stomach-churning 1954 witch hunt, representing the most vile smear tactics of the McCarthy era.

Nolan expertly builds his dramatic crescendo by exposing the pain and humiliation of that hearing for Oppenheimer and his flinty wife, Kitty (Emily Blunt), and then reopening those wounds five years later, during the Eisenhower administration’s Senate confirmation hearings for the nomination of Lewis Strauss (Robert Downey Jr.) as secretary of commerce.

In a mighty ensemble of heavy hitters, Downey gives the drama’s standout performance as Strauss, a founding member, and later chair, of the Atomic Energy Commission, whose political ambitions get tangled in his vindictiveness toward the arrogant Oppenheimer.

The actor makes him mild-mannered at first, playing up Strauss’ origins as a humble shoe salesman. The ruthlessness with which he pursues his goals is displayed only toward the end, when the stakes are at their highest, spilling out in a bitter torrent of rage. It’s a stunning moment of revelation and a reminder of skills that many of our best actors have put aside while they frolic around playing quippy superheroes for huge wads of cash.

Unexpectedly, I found it was the late-action intrigue — parallel strands unfolding in a dingy Capitol Hill conference room and in the Senate chamber — that left me breathlessly anticipating each new development, each betrayal and show of loyalty, each disclosure of who was pulling the strings. The extended setup prior to the Trinity test becomes more vital in retrospect, as we see how Oppenheimer’s associations both before and after he and his Manhattan Project team relocated to Los Alamos, New Mexico, to accelerate development of the atomic bomb, are dissected by political operators looking to discredit him.

As the central figure in this erudite saga of men and science, warfare and Washington opportunism, Murphy builds a fine-grained character portrait, making the soft-spoken Oppenheimer’s complexities no less evident for being a man of such outward restraint.

The actor’s piercing pale blue eyes are a window to the physicist’s lofty intellect, his dogged determination and, eventually, to his torment as he comes to acknowledge his naivety and face the ramifications of what he has set in motion. Rather than startle the world into playing nice, as he had ingenuously imagined, the Japanese bombings merely opened a door to the Cold War, and to the escalating threat of more powerful nuclear bombs — one that resonates louder than ever today.

Coverage of Oppenheimer’s early years feels somewhat cursory and his encounters with like-minded scientists initially tend to blur, though his studies at prestigious colleges in Europe — in addition to facilitating encounters with some of the field’s most influential figures — serve to show that his skills lay in theoretical physics, not lab work. But little by little, distinct personalities emerge.

Oppenheimer’s peers associated with the Manhattan Project, a handful of Nobel Prize winners among them, include his longtime friend Isidore Rabi (David Krumholtz, wonderful), his UC Berkeley colleague Ernest Lawrence (Josh Hartnett) and the hot-tempered Hungarian Edward Teller (Benny Safdie), whose real interest is in developing a hydrogen bomb, causing him to butt heads amusingly with others in the think tank.

Subtle notes of humor also come from the man that recruits Oppenheimer, Major Leslie Groves (Matt Damon), who oversees the secret research and development project and provides the liaison between the government and the scientists. A gruff career military man probably better suited to the battlefield than to War Department jobs, Groves has a stern manner but an underlying respect for Oppenheimer’s genius, a duality that Damon plays to moving effect in the 1954 hearing.

Blunt’s role at first seems limited to the supportive wife, urging her husband to fight harder for his reputation. But she has a knockout scene in the same hearing, disavowing her premarital affiliation to the American Communist Party without apologizing for it.

Kitty also shows her emotional resilience when confronted with her husband’s troubled romantic attachment to psychiatrist Jean Tatlock, a role brought to sensual but tortured life by Florence Pugh. Jean’s strong ties to Communism contribute to suspicions about Oppenheimer’s leftist leanings, as do those of his younger brother and fellow physicist, Frank (Dylan Arnold).

In small but significant roles, Casey Affleck pops up as a wily military intelligence officer; Rami Malek plays an experimental physicist who speaks passionately for the science community during the Strauss Senate hearing; Kenneth Branagh brings his usual authority to Danish physicist Niels Bohr, whose cautionary words prove prophetic; and Jason Clarke is a chilling attack dog as the special counsel at the 1954 hearing. An unbilled (and almost unrecognizable) major-name actor appears in one terrific scene in which President Truman bluntly informs Oppenheimer that people will remember who dropped the bomb, not who built it.

Aiding immeasurably in Nolan’s unfaltering control of tone and tension is Jennifer Lame’s nimble editing and especially Ludwig Göransson’s extraordinarily forceful, almost wall-to-wall score. The music combines with the bone-shaking sound design to give the movie a febrile energy that won’t quit, mirroring the nervous inner life of its title character.

The director deftly cranks up the suspense in the nail-biting countdown to the Trinity test, when even the sharpest minds haven’t ruled out the “near zero” chance of a chain reaction destroying the world; and even more so as each of the two hearings (shot in black and white) reaches its climax. The choice not to show the Japanese bombings, but to experience them exclusively via radio reports and through the jubilant reaction of the Los Alamos community — an entire township built expressly for the Manhattan Project — heightens the gut-punch impact, while images flashing through Oppenheimer’s mind only hint at the horror unleashed.

It’s hard to know how the Nolan fanboys will respond to a movie as heady, historically curious and grounded in gravitas as Oppenheimer, which has little in common with the brooding majesty of his Batman movies or the tricky mindfuckery of films like Inception or Tenet. In terms of its stirring solemnity, it’s perhaps closest to Dunkirk, while its melding of science and emotion recalls Interstellar.

The major draw for hard-core film geeks will be the visuals. Shooting with large-format Panavision and Imax 65mm cameras, DP Hoyte van Hoytema (in his fourth collaboration with Nolan) brings visceral intensity to the Trinity sequence and extraordinary texture and depth of field to the many dialogue-driven scenes. If you’re lucky enough to be near one of the 30 screens worldwide showing the film in Imax 70mm, you’ll experience a movie that, even at its talkiest, exerts an immersive hold, pulling you in to absorb the molecular detail of every shot.

This is a big, ballsy, serious-minded cinematic event of a type now virtually extinct from the studios. It fully embraces the contradictions of an intellectual giant who was also a deeply flawed man, his legacy complicated by his own ambivalence toward the breakthrough achievement that secured his place in the history books.

Full credits:

Distribution: Universal

Production companies: Syncopy, in association with Atlas Entertainment

Cast: Cillian Murphy, Emily Blunt, Matt Damon, Robert Downey Jr., Florence Pugh, Josh Hartnett, Casey Affleck, Rami Malek, Kenneth Branagh, Benny Safdie, Jason Clarke, Dylan Arnold, Tom Arnold, Gustaf Skarsgard, David Krumholtz, Matthew Modine, David Dastmalchian, Alden Ehrenreich, Jefferson Hall, Tony Goldwyn, Michael Angarano, Jack Quaid, Josh Peck, Olivia Thirlby, Dane DeHaan, Danny Deferrari

Director-screenwriter: Christopher Nolan, based on the book American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer, by Kai Bird, Martin J. Sherman

Producers: Emma Thomas, Charles Roven, Christopher Nolan

Executive producers: J. David Wargo, James Woods, Thomas Hayslip

Director of photography: Hoyte Van Hoytema

Production designer: Ruth De Jong

Costume designer: Ellen Mirojnick

Music: Ludwig Göransson

Editor: Jennifer Lame

Visual effects supervisor: Andrew Jackson

Special effects supervisors: Scott Fisher

Casting: John Papsidera

Rated R, 3 hours


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: christophernolan; communist; cppropaganda; homosexual; kaibird; sovietspy; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Red Badger

This was my first Nolan movie at the theater, and will likely be my last.


61 posted on 07/26/2023 6:20:37 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Extraordinary End to the Nazi Nuclear Program

Gen. Groves put together a Task Force known as the ALSOS Mission.

Lt. Col. Boris Pash was appointed to lead the task force as they searched in occupied Europe for Nuclear sites and Nuclear scientists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOvCYrHnJAc


62 posted on 07/26/2023 11:40:57 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
.....was cheaper than the project from which came the Boeing B-29.

That's true, although most people don't know it. The first BIG B-29 plant was a massive endeavor - brought into being by Henry Ford himself, IIRC.

Even here in Georgia at AF Plant 6 (now run by Lockheed-Martin) they had a huge B-29 production effort.

63 posted on 07/26/2023 11:46:58 PM PDT by Gaffer ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Why the US didn’t Nuke Tokyo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pa_NpZszBqE


64 posted on 07/27/2023 2:55:56 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Texan4Life
Why the US didn’t Nuke Tokyo

The REAL reason.

They knew. They just knew.

65 posted on 07/27/2023 3:05:55 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

In April 1943, Enrico Fermi raised with Robert Oppenheimer the possibility of using the radioactive byproducts from enrichment to contaminate the German food supply. The background was fear that the German atomic bomb project was already at an advanced stage, and Fermi was also skeptical at the time that an atomic bomb could be developed quickly enough. Oppenheimer discussed the “promising” proposal with Edward Teller, who suggested the use of strontium-90. James B. Conant and Leslie Groves were also briefed, but Oppenheimer wanted to proceed with the plan only if enough food could be contaminated with the weapon to kill half a million people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi


66 posted on 07/28/2023 10:01:06 AM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Atomic Blasts- Operations Greenhouse Through Upshot-Knothole - 1951-1953 - 29:22 - Color - Silent - This video shows a compilation of early atomic blasts taken from individual short films of the tests. These formerly classified films have never before been seen by the public. The video shows close up footage of boiling, tumbling, rolling fireballs of great destructive force as the nuclear power from the splitting of nuclei of atoms is unleashed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Pu_ZUl9YDM


67 posted on 07/28/2023 7:58:12 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DarrellZero

Exactly !


68 posted on 07/28/2023 8:08:13 PM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

“I read it’s rated R for graphic sex scenes. It’s a pass for me.”

Same here, although otherwise I’d like to see it as my parents were employed at Los Alamos. I don’t patronize pornography.


69 posted on 07/28/2023 8:33:21 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston
Why must every movie be so long now ? Even dumb comedies are clocking in at 2 hours . This film is 3 hours !

I would have edited the movie. 30-45 minutes less, the movie would be much better. 3 hours is too long. Oppenheimer was pretty good but felt a little slow at times, it's not like Mission Impossible where there was action in the movie.

70 posted on 07/28/2023 8:43:50 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The Evolution of Nuclear Bombs - 4K - Published 7/29/23

Swegle Studios

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-blLT5QQa4


71 posted on 07/30/2023 7:25:59 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Nolan is a Pornographer.


72 posted on 07/30/2023 7:26:40 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Why did Oppie want to keep his security clearance? He’d done his job. Afterwards it was time to go back to Berkeley, especially if he didn’t believe in what the military was doing.


73 posted on 07/30/2023 7:38:43 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Yeah. Too bad. The potential for a good story is there but the world’s agenda corrupts. My daughter works for Brookhaven.


74 posted on 07/31/2023 2:55:02 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

I somewhat involuntarily saw part of the “long” scene when searching for reviews. Video popped up, no really. No, I wouldn’t go to that. Sitting in a theater chair viewing nude people cavorting on screen is vicarious orgy participation. This would be a form of adultery and fornication. Not saying I am the most innocent person in the world, just close to it🤣


75 posted on 07/31/2023 4:42:50 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Yeah. I hate sitting through cringey parts of movies. That would definitely be cringe inducing. Now if the movie producers decide to release good products rather than filthy garbage, I’m there. Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb story are a personal interest to me as my mother survived the bombing of Hiroshima.


76 posted on 07/31/2023 4:50:25 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Interesting. Not that it matters, but my dad did machining on the Nagasaki weapon (”Little Boy”), not Fat Man.


77 posted on 07/31/2023 4:55:17 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: steve86

He is a part of history, just like my mom.


78 posted on 07/31/2023 5:34:36 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: All

New dates for the Oppenheimer IMAX 70mm theaters have been released.


79 posted on 08/08/2023 5:55:05 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: All

I saw Oppenheimer at the Dallas IMAX today. It was like seeing a different movie, from when I saw it several weeks ago in a regular theater.

The thing that made the difference for me was the quality of the audio in the IMAX theater. The fact that the image was super large, didn’t make all that much difference to me. So, the soundtrack came to life like it had not, watching Oppenheimer at a regular theater.

In fact, the explosions, were too much. But everything else in the film was made way more wonderful listening through the IMAX sound system!! The dialogue was crisp and clear, expect, there were just a few places where the music covered up the dialogue.


80 posted on 08/22/2023 9:01:35 PM PDT by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson