[DallasBiff]

Why do crazy leftists attack great western art?

How come they don't attack Picasso or Pollard?

[nickcarraway]

How is this helping the environment?

[The Sons of Liberty]

Why do crazy leftists attack great western art?
How come they don't attack Picasso or Pollard? or a Hunter Biden original?

Their heroes, the islamic state [ISIS], does the same thing.

[StormEye]

"How come they don't attack Picasso or Pollard? "

Or Warhol?

[knarf]

The west . . . America . . . must be erased from everyone's conscience.

Out of sight, out of mind . . . . that's why they pull down statues or move them where they are not seen.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Well some of those are "great western art" and some not so much.

I am sorry but if you think painting dark red strips on a black background is "art" much less great art you need to have your eyes checked.

[Seruzawa]

How would anyone even tell if a Pollard piece was defaced?

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

I still remember decades ago when some crank threw a bottle of India Ink at the Mona Lisa.
Then another who attacked the Pieta with a hammer.

So many cranks hope to get a “SEE ME!” moment doing such things.

[Paal Gulli]

" How come they don't attack Picasso or Pollard? "

If you'd bothered to read the article before posting the question, you'd have seen Mark Rothko's "Black on Maroon" was #10 on the list.

Any Rothko worth mention is equal in artistic worthlessness to anything ever done by Picasso or Pollard.

Because the CIA monetized abstract art to impressed the Soviets, this piece of crap is valued at $30 million USD.

[Mr. K]

I liked it when some German protesters glued themselves to the floor, and the company owners said “OK” and just left them there and turned out the lights.

They started whining about how no one would bring them food or water. (not to mention going PP)

That’s the way to handle those.

[Republicanprofessor]

Ping.