Members allege the sorority bent and broke its rules to induct Langford in September.Facebook / Artemis Langford
Posted on 06/25/2023 11:45:00 AM PDT by dennisw
A University of Wyoming sorority has hit back at members who complained about a trans woman being accepted into their local chapter — insisting the term “woman” is “unquestionably open to many interpretations.”
Seven sorority sisters from the Kappa Kappa Gamma sued the sorority in March, saying that the chapter violated its own rules by admitting Artemis Langford last year.
Six of the women then refiled the lawsuit in May after a judge twice barred them from suing anonymously.
The lawsuit claimed Langford’s presence in the Kappa Kappa Gamma house made some sorority members uncomfortable.
It alleged that the trans pledge would sit on a couch for hours while “staring at them without talking.”
On Tuesday, Kappa Kappa Gamma filed a motion to dismiss the suit, claiming that it is a “frivolous” attempt to kick Langford out for “their own political purposes.”
The motion also suggested the complaining members resign from the sorority if its “position of inclusion” is “too offensive” for them.
“Plaintiffs request the Court to insert itself into this controversial political debate and declare that a private organization can only interpret the term ‘woman’ using Plaintiffs’ exclusionary definition of biologically born females,” the motion, obtained by The Post, reads.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Members allege the sorority bent and broke its rules to induct Langford in September.Facebook / Artemis Langford
insisting the term “woman” is “unquestionably open to many interpretations.”
If the brilliant mind of a Supreme Court justice can’t define what a woman is, how can we mere mortals define such a term?
Kappa Kappa Gamma tore into its University of Wyoming members for suing the organization over accepting a transgender womanFacebook / Kappa Kappa Gamma University of Wyoming
The term “woman is unquestionably open to different interpretations.”
On one hand they don’t know how right they are.
Charlie Brown!
It’s all about “inclusion” to the Liz Cheney types, you all be damned if a sorority, only has biological females as members.
From now on your Delta Tau Chi name is “Blob”.
This fat slob son of a b!tch ALLEGEDLY got erections and would put a pillow over HIS lap to hide it.
I bet not one of those other sorority members would let that THING alone in a women’s bathroom with their little sisters.
Those women don’t realize that by not backing their members who are uncomfortable, scared or traumatized by this MAN in a WOMEN’S CLUB is the death knell for their little club.
Well the guy in the upper left of that photo, really looks out of place.
I’m going to need some serious eye bleach after looking at that abominable photo!
That is just one of the problems with the Equal Rights Amendment.
It took quite a few years for concerns voiced by Phyllis Schlafly to manifest. But here we are.
Unfortunately, conservatives don't understand how revolutionaries think. A little discomfort here, a little genocide there, is nothing to get upset over when the goal is to achieve social utopia. Objectors are immoral progress-stoppers. This revolutionary mindset has captured the current generation.
You can put lipstick on ———
———never mind.
“Kappa defines its membership in its position statement adopted in 2015 as individuals who identify as women,”
Then go to the next meeting, make a motion to change the rule and then take the vote the membership.
I am a simpleton:
If’n it’s got a d*ck, it ain’t a girl.
(Even a Supreme Court Nominee should be able to get this one.)
I'm not a "greek" campus person, back in my day, the fraternities and sororities, had basic limits, to pledge a fraternity, one had to have a biological penis, to pldge a sorority, one had to have a biological vagina.
Now you had the different variation, there was the nerd, jock, jewish, black, and stoner fraternities, and there were the preppy, fat girl, nerdy, and whorish soroities.
Times have changed.
Who admitted this trans person? National organization? Pledge committee at the house?
Resigning seems a good way to deal with the matter. Sue for your money back and be done with them.
The pledge appears to be spending too much time at the hog trough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.