Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; defconw; ...

Another theory just occurred to me......

Mitch McConnell. I can’t figure him out. Love to hate him. He acts like an evil player in all of this. Yet at various times in a crucial situation (e.g., Merrick Garland SCOTUS nomination) he does exactly what is needed by the patriots. What’s up with that? Was he blackmailed into doing the right thing? Or maybe he is truly on the side of the DS and here is the explanation (which now that I am thinking about it, I like a lot):

MG was always a sleeper white hat. We tried to sneak him onto the SCOTUS but MM blocked it because MM is evil. So the patriots made the best of the situation and we now have MG as a sleeper white hat in the AG position. I have long suspected MG was working for our side under deep cover. (Along with a few others we love to hate.) Hmmm. That makes coherent sense to me. Time will tell.


627 posted on 03/09/2023 8:29:37 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]


To: generally

Put the BONG DOWN you have had enough for today!!! MG a white hat I am STILL laughing!!!


629 posted on 03/09/2023 8:33:12 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies ]

To: generally
MG was always a sleeper white hat.

That's some theory! If he's a sleeper he's in a coma.

632 posted on 03/09/2023 8:46:21 AM PST by Keflavik76 (Don't want to be a brick in Babylons wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies ]

To: generally

MG was always a sleeper white hat. We tried to sneak him onto the SCOTUS but MM blocked it because MM is evil. So the patriots made the best of the situation and we now have MG as a sleeper white hat in the AG position. I have long suspected MG was working for our side under deep cover. (Along with a few others we love to hate.) Hmmm. That makes coherent sense to me. Time will tell.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

far out


633 posted on 03/09/2023 8:50:28 AM PST by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies ]

To: generally

He calculates the impact on his personal revenue and CoCo’s (family) assets.


637 posted on 03/09/2023 9:10:24 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Pink African -h/t BSU@Auburn U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies ]

To: generally; Melian; LittleLinda; bitt; Ymani Cricket; GYPSY286; thinden; Bigg Red; AFB-XYZ; ...

Q said someplace about we will be surprised later at how some “bad” are actually good, and some “good” are actually bad ones, leveraged. I wish someone could find that, I tried a while ago and could not. Pinging a few who might know or are better finders than me plus the this’n’that ping list.

AND this from Intel Slava recently, they got from Business Insider:

https://t.me/s/intelslava

Trump says he might let Russia take over areas of Ukraine as part of peace deal

Fox News cut out comments by former President Donald Trump in which he said he would have considered letting Russia have parts of Ukraine as part of a peace deal between the nations.

In an interview on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s radio show on Monday, which is not broadcast by Fox, Trump revealed how he would try and broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine in the wake of Russia’s invasion last year.

Trump has claimed he can quickly bring an end to the war as he seeks election again in 2024.

In the interview, he boasted of how Russia would not have dared to launch an attack during his presidency, and added: “I could have negotiated. At worst, I could’ve made a deal to take over something, there are certain areas that are Russian-speaking areas, frankly, but you could’ve worked a deal.”

The Daily Beast’s Justin Baragona reported that when Hannity played excerpts from the interview later that day on his prime time Fox News show, the part where Trump suggests he may have backed an agreement handing parts of Ukraine to Russia was edited out, with the excerpt cutting out after Trump says “I could’ve negotiated.”

- Business Insider


644 posted on 03/09/2023 10:08:05 AM PST by little jeremiah (Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Perhaps MG and his handlers simply didn’t cough up enough for MM to change his mind about not moving forward on MG’s nomination.

It’s like former IL Governor Blagojevic, realizing he had something of value when Barry prematurely gave up his US Senator’s seat to become Preezy. Blago wanted money to name the next senator. Because of the Dem Blago’s lack of public discretion, it was found out, of course, and Blago joined the host of previous IL governors that did stints in IL’s correctional facilities.

I’m sure MM knew better how to keep his payoffs from public scrutiny.

I don’t know how Barry’s “seat” could be worth much, as he laid it out there every time he signed his name. One might need to imagine that Barry likes the catcher’s position.


673 posted on 03/09/2023 12:35:13 PM PST by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson