Posted on 03/05/2023 12:22:51 PM PST by simpson96
ELLIS COUNTY, Texas — A mother was arrested in Italy, Texas, after she allegedly stabbed three of her children to death and and injured two more of her children Friday, sources told WFAA.
The mother has been identified as 25-year-old Shamaiya Hall.
Sources said three elementary school-aged kids (a 6-year-old and two 5-year-olds) were found dead inside a home near Stafford Elementary School in the small Ellis County town on Friday afternoon.
Two other children (4-year-old and 13-month-old) were injured and were transported by helicopter to a local hospital with stab wounds. Their conditions are unknown.
Child Protective Services confirmed to WFAA that all five children were siblings.
Sources with CPS told WFAA that Hall allegedly stabbed her children when a CPS worker, who suspected Hall was having unsupervised visitations with her children, arrived at the scene to check on her unannounced.
The children had been previously placed by CPS under the guardianship of another relative.
(Excerpt) Read more at wfaa.com ...
She’s not there.
According to the video:
- This woman and her twin sister tried to stab the woman’s boyfriend in 2017.
- Then, the twin sister stabbed her own child to death in 2021.
- The 5 children were staying with their grandmother, and they weren’t supposed to be left with their mother unsupervised.
Heartbroken for the children. Hopefully, doctors can save the two who survived.
My dad was a democrat until LBJ came along. He despised them until the day he died. He didn’t care for RINO’s either.
That is a rarity. The biomom has all the rights especially in “family” court when going up against biodad.
Yes,
In a society where you throw out morals, what do you have left? So called ethics, which are man made, situational (self admitted) and highly inconsistent. What you are left with is what we call “ethics,” but what is that?
In a modern Western society, you basically have a form of mob rule. Whatever the majority feels is right, becomes right ethically (the new concept of right and wrong), legally, supposedly scientifically.
Since man is by nature a sinner always seduced by sloth, greed, gluttony, pride, envy, wrath and lust, the results are predictable long term in where such a society will end. Man is hedonistic: selfish, short sighted and emotional.
***Today’s society also has taboo’s, but these are defined by academics, politicians, lawyers, and Hollywood.***
Both the rules and those defining the new rules have changed.
The people defining society today have a far higher pay grade and more advanced education, they attend more prestigious schools, than those silly folks that defined things in the past. I’m sure their income, degree, and school will ensure the best possible outcome. /sarc
These new standards of social conduct are not rooted in function, cultural heritage and religion, nor nature.
Hence you end up with kids getting mutilated at 12 because it’s the newest fad with all this gender nonsense. We violate peoples privacy and destroy their livelihood with Covid because it was politically expedient at the time. We end up using tax money to pay for HIV preventative medicines (PrEP) worth $1,750 a month per person but do little for someone with cancer, diabetes, or heart disease which cannot be prevented with a condom. We aggressively recruit women into the armed forces despite a laundry list of issues and poor historical performance...
-Culture / ones ethnic history and religion
-Nature
-Function and empirical evidence, i.e. logical based decision making
-The concept of truth and being consistent and transparent
None of that plays a role in policy making anymore.
Today we believe that we can make it so by simply saying it is so. Repeat it often, cancel dissent, pretend science supports the cause (science is the logical/rational seal of approval even though very little is actually science): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
But that doesn’t answer the original question, what are ethics? They are no more than what the majority being steered by economic and socio-political forces can agree on. Ethics usually mirrors corporate and government policies as well as the law. Ethics are a non-doctrinal attempt at replacing morals in telling people what right and wrong is. Of course this is the nuance meaning and not how Webster will define it.
Ethics are highly inconsistent and can change by location and over time, in fact even between people (hate crimes, quota’s for hiring or college admission), it does not need to be transparent. Not even the Golden Rule needs followed by those that are ethical today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
In an ethical system of thought, an abortionist can be a good guy.
The skin color of a murderer is always left out when the murderer is black or brown.
I’m simply amazed at how compliant people all around me are - each time a new rule or narrative is handed down via the fake news media, Hollywood and fake academia.
Even though it is obviously absurd, senseless, inconsistent and arbitrary - they lap it up and live by it.
For example, if I were to point to a dog and call it a cat, these people would known I was wrong and call me out. Ten years ago if I had pointed to a man and called him a woman - same thing - they would have all known I was wrong and said so.
But then the fake news media, Hollywood and fake academia conspire to push a narrative, and all these otherwise sensible people comply - they willingly accept the new narrative - no matter how absurd!
I have lost so much respect for so many people in recent years.. their willingness to comply with utter nonsense is appalling.
Yeah I know. Ours is, sadly, an anecdotal story to an extent. The biomom was a drug user and bipolar to boot.
“If I can’t have them, no one will have them.”
We live in a world that has an anti-culture.
What we call culture today is no more than consumerism and actually attacks all the mechanisms by which true culture are conveyed.
True culture and self identity creates barriers, national borders, racial and religious boundaries. These are the antithesis of what globalization is about. Globalization wants the free movement of goods, services, people, capital equipment, money and ideas. Someone who thinks in terms of a national, racial, and religious identity will inherently oppose this to some degree and in various forms.
What we call “culture” today is no more than consumerism.
If you want to appear successful, buy this brand of car. If you want to appear intellectual and cultured buy these magazine (spread them out at the office and home for everyone to see) and get a pedigree from the right school. If you want to appear ethical, buy something with a green label on it, support LGBTQIA, shake your head at a cocktail party about the horror of climate change while conversing with the like minded...
Culture has been lost and today all you have is mindless consumers that are incapable of critical thinking, that are unable to discern a difference (the fine art of culture is all about discrimination). These people are not taught formal logic, nor the pitfalls of fallacies, and that is why the modern MSM news is packed with these fallacies. These people literally are the “herd” Nietzsche refers to in his writing.
What teaches us culture? Our family, racial/tribal/national, and religious identity. All of these are destroyed or pushed into a corner and meaningless in our modern society.
So who does teach us “culture?” Harvey Weinstein, Victor Salva, Roman Polanski... some actor... musician... Social activists that influence the curricula taught in public schools, small minority groups that are vocal, organized and well funded like the LGBTQIA agenda.
Without culture, without knowing who they are, you can shape folks into what you want them to be, and that is what is being done.
In America you can go from not being able to be in the military, not being able to marry, adopt, hold a security clearance, and a political death sentence (1991) to every politician proudly proclaiming they have a homosexual friend or relative somewhere, the FBI and military actively recruiting homosexuals, every movie and song portraying them as happy and being unfairly treated (2011)... In fact the flip happened even faster than that, in a matter of about 7 years. How is that possible?
In a society without culture, there is little telling people what right and wrong, ugly and pretty, important and unimportant are. You can recreate this society into anything you want. You just need to be a little patient and approach it like the LGBTQIA community did: target education, the media/arts, use the legal system and buy the politician. That is how you long term get a 180 degree turn on something. There is no deep rooted culture which will resist this change.
The simple answer is yes, you are right, you can tell people that they are the offspring of aliens and that earth was seeded, all while you mock Christianity because it’s such an absurd idea, unscientific and can’t be proven: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/an-alien-origin-for-life-on-earth
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.