It was always about gaining control over the use of energy, and therefore, the means of production.
Since CO2 is soluble in water and the oceans cover a majority of the Earth's surface, the oceans sequester more CO2 than any other CO2 sink.
Because of the inverse solubility of CO2 with temperature, the colder the oceans get, the more CO2 they can absorb.
Conversely, when the oceans get warmer, they expel CO2.
Atmospheric CO2 therefore follows global temperatures, it does not cause them.
You can see the yearly global atmospheric CO2 fluctuation as the oceans warm and cool with the seasons in the NOAA graph below.
The "settled science" that CO2 causes "climate change" is criminal sophistry.
When they came out with bottled water, we used to joke when they would start charging for air.
Here is a FACT:
CO2 levels are higher than in the recent past. Most of that is due to burning hydrocarbons.
The Earth is 15% more green...an area larger than the US is now green today that was not green in the past.
That extra green is due to the higher CO2.
Isn’t it amazing how natural balance happens before our eyes?
Of course, it is discounted/ignored by those who have a fascist agenda to control every aspect of our lives.
Read Garret Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons. He wrote it in 1968. He was pushing for the developed world to massively subsidize the 3rd world, a one world government to control the "commons" (air, water, etc). This was a couple decades before "global warming" became the vehicle but notice how the supposed problem and the solutions are exactly the same.
The "population bomb/depletion of resources" in the 60s was yet another such attempt as was "global cooling" in the 70s. he "solutions" to the "crisis" are always the same - reduce consumption, give total power to a world government, and implement global socialism. That's a dead giveaway to anybody paying attention.
When watching Bimbo weather girls watch of 'this is a record high' without ever saying (about a different area) that 'this is a record low'...
When watching Bimbo weather girls watch for 'this is a record high' without ever saying (about a different area) that 'this is a record low'...
“My Reuters credentials meant that I had easy access to the finest climate scientists.”
He would have been enlightened years earlier if he had easy access to Free Republic.
bkmk
Great piece, thank you!
Sadly I think it will take a catastrophes like massive power blackouts, hundreds freezing to death in their homes without heat and the prospect of mass starvation to cause people to wake up to the climate change hoax
Of course they are. The great lie of the century has been perpetrated and the whole world has gobbled it down as scientific fact that can’t be disputed. Facts that prove it isn’t happening get ignored because the .eft have Invented the “New Truth”, and anyone that disputes it and shows evidence is ostracized, canceled and ignored
corrupt = lying, fer Gawd’s sake!
Temperature impact of CO2 levels off at 400ppm, which is now. CO2 levels were multiples higher tens of millions of years ago — nasty cave men!
CO2 at 1200ppm enhances food plant growth so much that hunger could be eliminated.
A higher global temp will green the Sahara, again, like it was tens of thousands of years ago.
Seems Reuters has been purging anyone who speaks reality:
https://sharylattkisson.com/2023/02/after-hours-claim-of-racial-and-political-bias-at-reuters-news/
Excellent interview w/ statistician who dared question the negative impacts of BLM anti-police hysteria.
Bkmkyy