Posted on 02/24/2023 8:12:31 AM PST by OKSooner
Against the narrative. Outside allowable discourse. Contradicts official stance. Should be dismissed as a conspiracy theory or Russian propaganda.
Are you reading from a Chris Wray memo?
I wonder how long before the editor of this newspaper is forced out. Pfizer is above media scrutiny.
You betcha he was. He was one of the main instigators, along with Mister MS-DOS.
Die Welt is a somewhat 2nd tier newspaper in Germany with daily circulation of 160K.
The largest is a tabloid. BILD. Circulation 1M+. The next two are not tabloids and larger than Die Welt, which is 4th.
This is not all that meaningful a source.
Nice how Pfizer did the vaxxxx trials in far off Buenos Aires. Argentina’s economy has been awful, so Pfizer had not trouble finding people who they could pay to participate in the vaxxxx trials.
If trials had been done here, the adverse reaction and deaths information would have leaked out.
OK Here’s your choice if you are CEO of pfizer
Be the first to market with Fauci/CDC Government-supported MRNA vaccine in the middle of a hotly politicized pandemic with Tens of $$$ Billions of Fed.gov contracts on the line, and double your stock price.
OR
Take your time on studies, look deeply into anomalies, figure out why your vaccine is causing heart and vascular problems in a minority of patients. Re-calibrate and start again
WHAT do you choose?
Fraud invalidates their immunity from liability.
Got it. ONLY read the largest MSM sources. Otherwise, its misinformation. No one else can be trusted.
That's why you only read WaPo and NY Times, right?
4 l8r bump!
They put a waiver in the contract to give them immunity for fraud and bad faith. That tells us that they knew exactly what they were doing. How can a government grant them such immunity? It’s crazy.
The interpretation of the data cited in this piece is accurate and consistent with what has been reported by other (non-corporate media) sources.
You don’t deal with “adverse data” in a clinical trial study by removing or expunging the patient from the study. That is deliberate fraud.
The trial data is generally consistent with what we are seeing in the real world - watch Ed Dowd’s recent presentation on the data analytics (interviewed for an hour by Tucker Carlson).
https://rumble.com/v2ailv0-tucker-carlson-interview-ed-dowd.html
Bttt
So why not Moderna also? I know Moderna is paying royalties to the US… are they paying them to Germany as well.
#PayToPlay #Corruptocracy.
As a former hospital attorney who dealt with drug trials all the time, if the information as reported is correct the trial should have been shut down long before these shots came on the market.
The original Pfizer results that were released in late 2020. Even after they scrubbed the report (an early whistle-blower highlighted that Pfizer wasn't being forthright in their test procedures -- promptly getting her fired after the FDA immediately ratted her out), it showed more deaths and heart issues with the vaccinated cohort vs the not vaccinated cohort.
Admittedly the differences were statistically insignificant (there were only 2000 people in each cohort), but the differences in the number of CoVid deaths between both groups were also significant. I think there were two deaths attributed to CoVid in the unvaccinated group vs one in the vaccinated group. So Fauci and the media lackeys were all crowing about a nearly 100% relative efficacy rate... Total crap.
You want good, impartial sources? Get out of the US in your search.
Think in terms of Qatar. Or India. Not aligned with anyone. And they have the money to fund reportage.
If it doesn’t come from them, it likely has agenda in it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.